“新常態(tài)”時(shí)期中國(guó)財(cái)政政策調(diào)控模式研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-07-09 11:27
本文選題:財(cái)政政策 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng); 參考:《現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討》2017年10期
【摘要】:該文主要以1996年第1季度—2017年第1季度的財(cái)政政策和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)等數(shù)據(jù)為基礎(chǔ),運(yùn)用MS-VAR模型研究了不同區(qū)制下,財(cái)政支出和財(cái)政收入對(duì)通貨膨脹和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的作用機(jī)制。從中主要得出兩方面的結(jié)論,一方面是財(cái)政政策的作用發(fā)揮依賴于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展所處的階段,根據(jù)我國(guó)實(shí)際情況區(qū)制變量將樣本期間內(nèi)的經(jīng)濟(jì)劃分為"低速增長(zhǎng)"時(shí)期(區(qū)制1)、"適速增長(zhǎng)"時(shí)期(區(qū)制2)和"高速增長(zhǎng)"(區(qū)制3)時(shí)期,就穩(wěn)定性而言,區(qū)制1最優(yōu),區(qū)制2次之,區(qū)制3最弱,就財(cái)政支出的沖擊效果和減小速度而言,區(qū)制2最顯著,區(qū)制3中次之,區(qū)制1中最弱。另一方面是減少財(cái)政收入在區(qū)制1中的效果較好,增加財(cái)政收入在區(qū)制2和區(qū)制3中的效果較好。由此在"新常態(tài)"時(shí)期給出了兩方面的政策建議,一方面是目前政府應(yīng)該采取以減少財(cái)政收入為主的財(cái)政政策,以擴(kuò)大財(cái)政支出型的財(cái)政政策為輔,另一方面是政府繼續(xù)發(fā)揮財(cái)政政策的局部著力作用,進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化財(cái)政支出和收入結(jié)構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:Based on the data of fiscal policy and economic growth from the first quarter of 1996 to the first quarter of 2017, this paper uses the MS-VAR model to study the mechanism of the effect of fiscal expenditure and revenue on inflation and economic growth under different regional systems. Two main conclusions are drawn. On the one hand, the role of fiscal policy depends on the stage in which economic development takes place. According to the actual situation of our country, the economy in the sample period is divided into three periods: the period of "low speed growth" (region system 1), the period of "appropriate speed growth period" (region system 2) and the period of "high speed growth" (region system 3). In terms of stability, the region system 1 is the best. In terms of the impact effect and decreasing speed of fiscal expenditure, the region system 2 was the most significant, the region system 3 was the second, and the region system 1 was the weakest. On the other hand, the effect of reducing fiscal revenue in district system 1 is better than that of increasing fiscal revenue in district system 2 and district system 3. Therefore, during the "new normal" period, two policy suggestions were put forward. On the one hand, the government should adopt fiscal policies that focus on reducing fiscal revenues, supplemented by fiscal policies that expand the pattern of fiscal expenditure. On the other hand, the government continues to exert the partial focus of fiscal policy and further optimize the structure of fiscal expenditure and revenue.
【作者單位】: 東北師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:F812.0
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉云峰,楊波;積極財(cái)政政策的調(diào)整思路[J];財(cái)金貿(mào)易;2000年09期
2 喬應(yīng)平;民間投資為何難以啟動(dòng)——來(lái)自財(cái)政政策的一種解釋[J];財(cái)會(huì)研究;2000年07期
3 荊棘;“軟著陸”后的成功抉擇 “非常之舉”帶來(lái)“非常效能”──“兩會(huì)”代表、委員談積極財(cái)政政策[J];w攣胖蕓,
本文編號(hào):2109209
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2109209.html
最近更新
教材專著