本文選題：環(huán)境財(cái)政政策 + 環(huán)境稅收政策��； 參考：《中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境》2017年01期

【摘要】：首先參照投入—產(chǎn)出比,利用環(huán)保財(cái)政投入占GDP比重與環(huán)境污染綜合指數(shù)之比對(duì)各區(qū)域環(huán)境財(cái)政政策治污效應(yīng)系數(shù)進(jìn)行測(cè)算,按系數(shù)值域把中國(guó)30個(gè)省(市)分成兩個(gè)區(qū)域,區(qū)域1包括北京、甘肅、貴州等19個(gè)省市,區(qū)域2包括上海、浙江、福建等11個(gè)省市。其次分析環(huán)境財(cái)政政策、環(huán)境稅收政策和中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)的治污效應(yīng)并分區(qū)檢驗(yàn),最后對(duì)中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平的門(mén)檻效應(yīng)進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)。結(jié)果表明:環(huán)境財(cái)政政策治污效應(yīng)顯著,區(qū)域1財(cái)政政策取得了更好的治污效果,中國(guó)目前車(chē)船稅、城市維護(hù)建設(shè)稅、土地使用稅、耕地占用稅、資源稅及排污費(fèi)等"近似"環(huán)境稅種總體治污效應(yīng)不顯著,中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)與污染物排放顯著正相關(guān),中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平對(duì)財(cái)政政策的治污效應(yīng)具有顯著的門(mén)檻效應(yīng),當(dāng)中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)度低于-0.164、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平低于4.174時(shí),環(huán)境財(cái)政政策具有更好的治污效果。樣本期內(nèi)以中國(guó)式環(huán)境分權(quán)為門(mén)檻變量時(shí),有安徽、廣西等15%的觀測(cè)值位于低門(mén)檻區(qū)域,以經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平為門(mén)檻變量時(shí),有貴州、云南等10%的觀測(cè)值位于低門(mén)檻區(qū)域。中國(guó)目前的能源消費(fèi)結(jié)構(gòu)和工業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)是加劇環(huán)境污染的重要原因,城鎮(zhèn)化和對(duì)外開(kāi)放在一定程度上助推了高污染和高排放。鑒于此應(yīng)加大環(huán)境保護(hù)財(cái)政支出,提升環(huán)保財(cái)政支出占GDP的比重,單獨(dú)開(kāi)征環(huán)境保護(hù)稅種,中央政府適度地環(huán)境集權(quán),全面提升環(huán)境質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:First of all, referring to the input-output ratio, using the ratio of environmental finance input to GDP and the comprehensive index of environmental pollution to calculate the pollution control effect coefficient of environmental finance policy in each region, 30 provinces (cities) in China are divided into two regions according to the range of coefficient. Region 1 includes 19 provinces and cities such as Beijing, Gansu and Guizhou, and region 2 includes 11 provinces and cities such as Shanghai, Zhejiang and Fujian. Secondly, the environmental fiscal policy, environmental tax policy and the pollution control effect of Chinese environmental decentralization are analyzed and tested. Finally, the threshold effect of Chinese environmental decentralization and economic development level is tested empirically. The results show that the environmental fiscal policy has a significant effect on pollution control, and region 1 fiscal policy has achieved better pollution control effect. China's current vehicle and vessel tax, urban maintenance and construction tax, land use tax, cultivated land occupation tax, etc. The "approximate" environmental tax, such as resource tax and sewage charge, has no significant overall pollution control effect, and the Chinese environmental decentralization has a significant positive correlation with pollutant emission. The environmental decentralization and economic development level in China have significant threshold effect on the pollution control effect of fiscal policy. When the degree of environmental decentralization in China is lower than -0.164 and the level of economic development is lower than 4.174, the environmental fiscal policy has better pollution control effect. In the sample period, 15% of the observed values of Anhui and Guangxi are located in the low threshold area, and 10% of the observed values of Guizhou and Yunnan are located in the low threshold area, taking the level of economic development as the threshold variable. China's current energy consumption structure and industrial structure are important reasons for aggravating environmental pollution. Urbanization and opening to the outside world to a certain extent contribute to high pollution and high emissions. In view of this, we should increase the fiscal expenditure on environmental protection, increase the proportion of environmental finance expenditure to GDP, levy environmental protection taxes separately, and the central government should centralize environmental power moderately and improve the environmental quality in an all-round way.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;重慶師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目“碳減排與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的最優(yōu)耦合測(cè)度及差別化減排方案設(shè)計(jì)”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2012M511898) 重慶市人民政府發(fā)展研究中心項(xiàng)目“聯(lián)動(dòng)治理農(nóng)村面源污染推進(jìn)美麗鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)的對(duì)策研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2014-ZB-11)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F812.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 段軍山;張立軍;;金融發(fā)展門(mén)檻效應(yīng)對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)收入差距影響分析[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年07期

2 李平;宮旭紅;張慶昌;;工資上漲促進(jìn)勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率提升:存在性及門(mén)檻效應(yīng)研究[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

3 師榮蓉;徐璋勇;趙彥嘉;;金融減貧的門(mén)檻效應(yīng)及其實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)——基于中國(guó)西部省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2013年03期

4 陶韜;;金融發(fā)展影響城鄉(xiāng)收入差距的門(mén)檻效應(yīng)及檢驗(yàn)[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)銀行武漢培訓(xùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

5 管福泉;劉劍鋒;蔣琴兒;;浙江省金融發(fā)展對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)收入差距影響的門(mén)檻效應(yīng)分析——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)分析法[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年07期

6 王麗麗;;門(mén)檻效應(yīng)、制造業(yè)地區(qū)集聚與全要素生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)——基于貿(mào)易開(kāi)放的視角[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢;2012年03期

7 孟兆娟;張樂(lè)柱;;金融發(fā)展影響收入分配“門(mén)檻效應(yīng)”的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2014年07期

8 韓玉軍;陸e，

本文編號(hào)：2047813