本文選題：公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付 + 貧困　； 參考：《經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》2017年09期

【摘要】：本文首先假設(shè)增加的公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付有兩種籌資方式使財(cái)政收支保持平衡,一種籌資選擇為增加家庭和企業(yè)的直接稅,另一種籌資選擇為增加間接稅,并使用計(jì)量估計(jì)的微觀模擬模型與可計(jì)算一般均衡模型相結(jié)合的自上而下和自下而上方法,評(píng)估公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付增加對(duì)收入不平等和貧困的效應(yīng)。結(jié)果顯示:如果增加公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付的籌資方式為直接稅,GDP可能會(huì)隨著消費(fèi)的增加而增加;直接稅籌資只有很小的勞動(dòng)供給減少效應(yīng);直接稅籌資的不平等指標(biāo)下降程度比間接稅籌資下降程度大;如果增加1倍的公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付的籌資方式為直接稅,貧困發(fā)生率下降2%,采用間接稅籌資方式,貧困發(fā)生率下降1%。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we first assume that there are two financing options for increasing public transfer payments, one is to increase the direct tax on households and enterprises, and the other is to increase indirect taxes. The top-down and bottom-up methods are used to evaluate the effects of increasing public transfer payments on income inequality and poverty. The results show that if the financing mode of increasing public transfer payment is direct tax GDP may increase with the increase of consumption direct tax financing has only a small effect on labor supply reduction. The inequality index of direct tax financing decreased more than indirect tax financing; if the financing method of double public transfer payment is direct tax, the incidence of poverty drops by 2%, and the incidence of poverty decreases by 1% by indirect tax financing.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(71673167) 教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項(xiàng)目(15YJA790027) 山東省自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(ZR2014GM001)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：F126;F812.45
，

本文編號(hào)：2011065