【摘要】：目前我國生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展中存在多種社區(qū)參與模式,但成效各異。比較典型且效果較好的主要有社區(qū)居民主導(dǎo)的"雨崩模式";政府主導(dǎo)、社區(qū)居民參與的"西江模式"以及政府引導(dǎo)、社區(qū)居民參與、旅游開發(fā)商主導(dǎo)的"天龍模式"。三種模式各有利弊,成長于不同的自然和社會環(huán)境。我國生態(tài)旅游資源豐富且分布廣泛,因此選擇一種具有普遍適用性的社區(qū)參與模式是不現(xiàn)實的。
[Abstract]:At present, there are a variety of community participation models in the development of ecotourism in China, but the results are different. The typical and effective ones are mainly the "avalanche mode" led by the community residents, the "Xijiang model" led by the government, the "Xijiang model" by the community residents and the "Tianlong model" led by the government, the community residents and the tourism developers. The three models have their own advantages and disadvantages and grow up in different natural and social environments. China is rich in ecotourism resources and widely distributed, so it is not realistic to choose a universal mode of community participation.
【作者單位】： 鹽城工學(xué)院旅游系;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目(項目編號13BJL087)
【分類號】：F592;F205

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 保繼剛;孫九霞;;雨崩村社區(qū)旅游:社區(qū)參與方式及其增權(quán)意義[J];旅游論壇;2008年04期

2 費廣玉;陳志永;;民族村寨社區(qū)政府主導(dǎo)旅游開發(fā)模式研究——以西江千戶苗寨為例[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年06期

3 孫美t，

本文編號：2414145