本文關(guān)鍵詞：重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異研究　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 旅游經(jīng)濟(jì) 空間差異 空間協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展 重慶市

【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以來(lái),重慶市旅游業(yè)得到了長(zhǎng)足的發(fā)展,但旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異矛盾依然突出。以39個(gè)區(qū)縣為基本研究單元,采用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差、變異系數(shù)、泰爾指數(shù)、絕對(duì)集中指數(shù)、首位度、位序-規(guī)模分析、空間重心分析、相關(guān)分析、因子分析、聚類(lèi)分析、灰色預(yù)測(cè)模型等多種數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)和計(jì)量模型分析方法,定量分析了2000～2012年間重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)在規(guī)模結(jié)構(gòu)、增長(zhǎng)情況、綜合水平等方面的空間差異情況,預(yù)測(cè)了空間差異的未來(lái)趨勢(shì)和警戒水平,探究了空間差異主、客觀影響因素及其相互作用機(jī)理,提出了空間協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的原則和路徑。研究結(jié)果表明： (1)2000～2012年間,重慶市南部區(qū)域旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模較北部區(qū)域大且規(guī)模差異穩(wěn)定,西部區(qū)域較東部區(qū)域差異大但規(guī)模差異不斷減小。旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)�？臻g絕對(duì)差異在研究期內(nèi)顯著擴(kuò)大,預(yù)計(jì)2018年將達(dá)到公平與效率并重的“最佳狀態(tài)”,其后將突破警戒線(xiàn)；空間相對(duì)差異在研究期內(nèi)始終位于警戒線(xiàn)之上,但差異水平逐漸減小,預(yù)計(jì)從2018年開(kāi)始進(jìn)入“無(wú)警”狀態(tài)。地帶間差異、地帶內(nèi)差異分別在研究期前、后階段構(gòu)成空間總體差異的主因,未來(lái)縮小重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)�？傮w差異應(yīng)把促進(jìn)地帶內(nèi)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)平衡放在首位。旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)位序-規(guī)模分布由首位分布型逐漸向集中分布型演變,空間極化格局由低集中寡占型逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楦?jìng)爭(zhēng)型,縣域旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模集聚的空間結(jié)構(gòu)逐漸趨于合理。旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)重心位于渝北區(qū)和巴南區(qū)相鄰的長(zhǎng)江兩岸區(qū)域,與空間幾何重心的偏移距離為36～57km,主城核心區(qū)對(duì)偏移起絕對(duì)作用。 (2)研究期內(nèi)重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)絕對(duì)增長(zhǎng)差異總體平穩(wěn)下降,相對(duì)增長(zhǎng)差異在小幅波動(dòng)中保持平衡；西北部和東南部在2000～2005年間增長(zhǎng)較快,南部和東北部在2006～2012年間增長(zhǎng)較快；渝中區(qū)對(duì)全市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模增長(zhǎng)具有強(qiáng)有力的帶頭作用,但頂頭優(yōu)勢(shì)有所減弱；墊江縣、城口縣、大渡口區(qū)的旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模增長(zhǎng)極為緩慢。2000～2005年間重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中心為北碚區(qū)；武隆縣因其“強(qiáng)資源,高定位,大投入,大營(yíng)銷(xiāo)”的優(yōu)勢(shì)成為2006～2012年全市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中心。 (3)研究期內(nèi)重慶市各區(qū)縣旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)地位的空間絕對(duì)差異整體呈上升趨勢(shì),空間相對(duì)差異整體較為平穩(wěn)；渝中、南岸、巴南、北碚等4個(gè)區(qū)縣旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)地位類(lèi)型始終為“大規(guī)模,高地位”；沙坪壩區(qū)、渝北區(qū)、萬(wàn)州區(qū)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模較大,但產(chǎn)業(yè)地位偏低；超過(guò)半數(shù)區(qū)縣的旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)地位類(lèi)型為“小規(guī)模,低地位”。重慶市2006～2012年間旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)質(zhì)量總體低效且空間絕對(duì)差異十分明顯,空間相對(duì)差異整體較小,二者均呈現(xiàn)出先增后減態(tài)勢(shì)；渝中、江北、巴南、永川、武隆等5個(gè)區(qū)縣的旅游流質(zhì)量類(lèi)型為“大流量,高流質(zhì)”,超過(guò)半數(shù)區(qū)縣為“小流量,低流質(zhì)”。 (4)2006～2012年間重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平等級(jí)極高的區(qū)縣為渝中區(qū),高的區(qū)縣為武隆縣,較高的區(qū)縣為北碚區(qū)、南岸區(qū),旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平一般的有沙坪壩、九龍坡、江北、萬(wàn)州、萬(wàn)盛、巫山、巴南、永川、大足、渝北、豐都、南川、奉節(jié)、石柱、江津等15個(gè)區(qū)縣,其余20個(gè)區(qū)縣的旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平為低等級(jí)。四大地帶的旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平從高到低依次為都市旅游核心區(qū)、渝東南民俗生態(tài)旅游帶、環(huán)都市休閑旅游區(qū)、長(zhǎng)江三峽黃金旅游帶;各地帶內(nèi)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平最高的區(qū)縣分別為渝中區(qū)、武隆縣、萬(wàn)盛區(qū)、萬(wàn)州區(qū)。未來(lái)縮小重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)地帶間差異的著力點(diǎn)是提高長(zhǎng)江三峽黃金旅游帶的旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合水平。 (5)重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異的形成是產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平、旅游資源稟賦、交通區(qū)位條件、城鎮(zhèn)化水平等客觀因素和旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)定位、政策措施執(zhí)行力度、社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)宏觀政策等主觀因素相互作用的結(jié)果。在主觀因素中,旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)較好的區(qū)縣旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)定位普遍較高,高效的旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)政策執(zhí)行力對(duì)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)增速存在促進(jìn)作用；社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)宏觀政策通過(guò)對(duì)客觀因素的影響間接作用于旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異的形成。在客觀因素中,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平對(duì)重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異的影響作用最為顯著,其次為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平；相對(duì)于交通及區(qū)位條件而言,高稟賦的旅游資源所產(chǎn)生的強(qiáng)大吸引力仍是刺激游客選擇旅游目的地的基本動(dòng)因,城鎮(zhèn)化水平對(duì)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異影響最弱。 (6)重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展應(yīng)遵循“政府主導(dǎo),統(tǒng)籌規(guī)劃；效率優(yōu)先,兼顧公平；因地制宜,優(yōu)劣互補(bǔ)；生態(tài)文明,包容發(fā)展”的原則；構(gòu)建“一心一環(huán)兩帶”旅游業(yè)發(fā)展空間格局；整合資源,將巫溪縣培育成重慶市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)新的增長(zhǎng)中心；加強(qiáng)政策保障,適度傾斜落后地區(qū)；完善旅游統(tǒng)計(jì),建立旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異預(yù)警機(jī)制。各區(qū)縣特別是旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)落后區(qū)縣應(yīng)優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),增加第三產(chǎn)業(yè)投入力度；明確旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)定位,加強(qiáng)旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)政策執(zhí)行效力；地域相鄰、旅游資源趨同的區(qū)縣應(yīng)打破體制障礙,加強(qiáng)區(qū)域旅游合作,依托路網(wǎng)體系,構(gòu)建跨區(qū)域特色旅游產(chǎn)品或建設(shè)無(wú)障礙旅游區(qū)；建設(shè)和完善交通等基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,增強(qiáng)旅游目的地的可進(jìn)入性；加大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合力度,促進(jìn)旅游業(yè)與城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)、現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In the 21st century , the tourism industry in Chongqing has been developing rapidly , but the contradiction between tourism economy and space is still outstanding . In 39 districts and counties as the basic research units , the spatial differences of tourism economy in size , index , order - scale analysis , spatial center of gravity , correlation analysis , factor analysis , cluster analysis and grey forecasting model are used to quantitatively analyze the future trend and vigilance level of Chongqing ' s tourism economy in scale structure , growth condition and comprehensive level . ( 1 ) During the period from 2000 to 2012 , the regional tourism economy in the southern part of Chongqing is large and the scale difference is stable , the difference between the western region and the east region is large , but the scale difference is continuously reduced . The difference between the zones is expected to be fair and efficient in 2018 . The spatial polarization pattern is gradually changed from the first distribution type to the competition type , and the spatial polarization pattern is gradually changed into the competition type from the first distribution type . The offset distance between the center of the tourism economy and the center of gravity of the spatial geometry is 36 - 57km , and the main city core area has an absolute effect on the offset . ( 2 ) During the research period , the absolute growth of tourism economy in Chongqing has declined overall , and the relative growth difference is balanced in the small amplitude fluctuation . The growth of tourism economy in the north and south - east is relatively fast in the period from 2000 to 2005 ; the growth of tourism economy in the south and north - east in 2006 - 2012 is very slow . In 2000 - 2005 , Chongqing ' s tourism economic growth center is Beibei district . ( 3 ) In the study period , the spatial absolute difference of tourism economic industry status of Chongqing City in Chongqing is higher than that of the whole , and the relative difference of space is relatively stable . In Chongqing , the tourism economic industry status of the four districts , such as the south bank , the south bank , the south bank , the Beibei , and the like , is always " large - scale and high - status " . ( 4 ) The comprehensive level of tourism economy in Chongqing from 2006 to 2012 is Yuzhong District , and the high district is Wuchuan District . The higher districts and counties are Beibei District , Nankai District , Yongchuan , Dazu , Wushan , Bainan , Yongchuan , Dazu , Wushan , Bainan , Yongchuan , Fengjie , Shizhu , Jiangjin and other 15 districts . The highest levels of tourism economy in the four zones are Yuzhong District , Wulong County , Wansheng District and Wanzhou District . ( 5 ) The formation of tourism economic space difference in Chongqing is the result of the interaction of objective factors such as industrial structure level , economic development level , tourism resource endowment , transportation location condition , urbanization level , etc . ( 6 ) The coordinated development of tourism economy in Chongqing should follow the principle of " government ownership , overall planning , efficiency priority , fairness , adaptability to local conditions , complementary advantages , ecological civilization and inclusive development " .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊世河;;黃山市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展時(shí)空差異性分析[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2007年04期

2 程進(jìn);陸林;;安徽省區(qū)域旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)差異研究[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年01期

3 王敬武;區(qū)域旅游業(yè)橫向?qū)嵙Ψ治觥貐^(qū)旅游業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)程度指數(shù)初探[J];北京商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 周鳳杰;張愛(ài)平;馬楠;;環(huán)渤海區(qū)域旅游空間分異研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2012年01期

5 顧江,侯祥鵬;我國(guó)省際旅游業(yè)綜合發(fā)展實(shí)力比較研究——兼論江蘇旅游業(yè)的發(fā)展[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年04期

6 郭利平,陳忠暖;中國(guó)區(qū)域旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合實(shí)力分析和類(lèi)型劃分[J];地理學(xué)與國(guó)土研究;2001年03期

7 張祖群;蔡紅;;旅游供給的二維組合態(tài)勢(shì)與創(chuàng)新開(kāi)發(fā)模式——我國(guó)西部12省(區(qū))案例[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2005年06期

8 肖光明;;珠三角城市旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)空間差異與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2009年06期

9 陸大道,劉衛(wèi)東;論我國(guó)區(qū)域發(fā)展與區(qū)域政策的地學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];地理科學(xué);2000年06期

10 汪德根;陳田;;中國(guó)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)域差異的空間分析[J];地理科學(xué);2011年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1356248