本文選題：家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)　切入點：公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：公務(wù)員是當(dāng)代中國一個特殊的政治群體。陸學(xué)藝(2002)認(rèn)為,公務(wù)員群體是“整個社會階層結(jié)構(gòu)中的主導(dǎo)性階層,是當(dāng)前社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展及市場化改革的主要推動者和組織者�！痹谖覈�(dāng)前政治體制中,公務(wù)員代表行政組織行使國家公權(quán)力。加強(qiáng)公務(wù)員道德建設(shè)研究,規(guī)范公務(wù)員道德行為,是有效防范權(quán)力異化、維護(hù)公民利益,進(jìn)而實現(xiàn)社會公平正義、和諧穩(wěn)定的題中之義。親組織不道德行為(unethical pro-organizational behaviors,UPB)是指個體為了所屬組織和/或成員的利益而從事的有違道德甚至法律的行為�；谖覈鴤鹘y(tǒng)文化背景和行政特色,本研究探討了家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為的關(guān)系,以及在兩者關(guān)系中道德推脫的中介作用和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換的調(diào)節(jié)作用,以揭示家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)影響公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為的作用機(jī)制和限制條件。研究主要從以下三個方面展開:首先,修訂了公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為量表。以UmphressBingham(2010)、MatherneLitchfield(2012)的親組織不道德量表為藍(lán)本,參考吳明證、沈斌和孫曉玲(2016)在兩者基礎(chǔ)上修訂的合并量表,通過訪談和問卷調(diào)查,最后得到包含8道題項的公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為量表。該量表具有較好的心理計量學(xué)特征。其次,探討了道德推脫在家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為關(guān)系中的中介作用。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)各維度中,威權(quán)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為呈正關(guān)系,德行領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為呈負(fù)關(guān)系,而仁慈領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為相關(guān)性不顯著。不僅如此,道德推脫在威權(quán)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為關(guān)系中發(fā)揮著部分中介作用,在德行領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為關(guān)系中發(fā)揮著完全中介作用。最后,探討了領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換在家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換調(diào)節(jié)著威權(quán)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為的關(guān)系,威權(quán)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)只有在高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換條件下才能有效預(yù)測公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換調(diào)節(jié)著仁慈領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為的關(guān)系,高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換下仁慈領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為呈負(fù)相關(guān),而低領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換關(guān)系下仁慈領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為呈正相關(guān);高質(zhì)量領(lǐng)導(dǎo)成員交換能提升德行領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對公務(wù)員親組織不道德行為的預(yù)測作用。
[Abstract]:Civil servant is a special political group in contemporary China.According to Lu Xueyi (2002), the group of civil servants is "the leading stratum in the whole social stratum structure, and the main promoter and organizer of the current social and economic development and market-oriented reform."In China's current political system, civil servants on behalf of administrative organizations exercise public power.Strengthening the research of civil servants' moral construction and standardizing civil servants' moral behavior is the meaning of effectively preventing the alienation of power, safeguarding the interests of citizens, and realizing social fairness and justice, harmony and stability.Pro-organization immoral behavior (UPBs) refers to the unethical and even legal behavior of an individual for the benefit of his or her organization and / or members.Based on the traditional cultural background and administrative characteristics of our country, this study probes into the relationship between paternalistic leadership and civil servants' immoral behavior of pro-organization, the intermediary role of moral deduction and the regulating role of the exchange of leading members in the relationship between them.In order to reveal the role of paternalistic leadership in influencing civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior and restrictions.The research is mainly carried out in the following three aspects: firstly, the civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior scale is revised.Taking Umphres Bingham-2010 / Matherne Litchfield (2012) as the original version, referring to Wu Mingzheng, Shen Bin and Sun Xiaoling (2016), the combined scale was revised on the basis of both. Finally, through interviews and questionnaires, the civil servants' pro organization immoral behavior scale containing 8 items was obtained.The scale has good psychometrics characteristics.Secondly, it discusses the intermediary role of moral deduction in the relationship between patriarchal leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.The study found that, in each dimension of paternalistic leadership, authoritarian leadership has a positive relationship with civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and moral leadership has a negative relationship with civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behavior.However, there was no significant correlation between benevolent leadership and pro-organization immoral behavior of civil servants.Not only that, moral deduction plays a part of intermediary role in the relationship between authoritarian leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and it plays a complete intermediary role in the relationship between moral leaders and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.Finally, the paper discusses the role of leadership exchange in the relationship between patriarchal leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.It is found that leadership exchange regulates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and authoritarian leadership can effectively predict civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior only under the condition of high leadership member exchange.The exchange of leadership members regulates the relationship between benevolent leadership and civil servants' unethical behavior of pro-organization, and the relationship between merciful leadership and civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behavior is negatively correlated with that of high leaders.However, there is a positive correlation between benevolent leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior under the exchange relationship of low leadership members, and the exchange of high-quality leadership members can enhance the predictive effect of moral leaders on civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behaviors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：C933;D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳明證;邵曉露;孫曉玲;李寧;;服務(wù)型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、道德認(rèn)同與UPB的關(guān)系[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2017年02期

2 趙紅丹;周君;;企業(yè)偽善、道德推脫與親組織非倫理行為:有調(diào)節(jié)的中介效應(yīng)[J];外國經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2017年01期

3 孫麗君;杜紅芹;牛更楓;李俊一;胡祥恩;;心理虐待與忽視對青少年攻擊行為的影響:道德推脫的中介與調(diào)節(jié)作用[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2017年01期

4 李根強(qiáng);;倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、組織認(rèn)同與員工親組織非倫理行為:特質(zhì)調(diào)節(jié)焦點的調(diào)節(jié)作用[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2016年12期

5 萬鵬宇;馮志遠(yuǎn);徐奧;黃霞妮;徐明津;楊新國;;真誠領(lǐng)導(dǎo)和工作投入對稅務(wù)系統(tǒng)基層公務(wù)員離職傾向影響[J];中國職業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué);2016年05期

6 張品茹;;家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與部門績效、離職意愿的關(guān)系研究[J];中國勞動;2016年18期

7 林英暉;程墾;;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)-部屬交換與員工親組織非倫理行為:差序格局視角[J];管理科學(xué);2016年05期

8 文鵬;夏玲;陳誠;;責(zé)任型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對員工揭發(fā)意愿與非倫理行為的影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年07期

9 張艷清;王曉暉;王海波;;組織情境下的不道德行為現(xiàn)象:來自道德推脫理論的解釋[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2016年07期

10 葛蕾蕾;;變革型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對公務(wù)員工作態(tài)度的影響——公共服務(wù)動機(jī)的中介效應(yīng)研究[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 杜寧讓;家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對公務(wù)員工作績效的影響機(jī)制研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

2 夏福斌;員工不道德親組織行為的前因與后果研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

3 白潔;中國現(xiàn)代行政組織倫理困境的思考[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 張麗;大學(xué)生道德推脫、父母教養(yǎng)方式與攻擊行為的關(guān)系研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2016年

2 劉曉麗;倫理型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對員工不道德行為的影響研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2015年

3 孫天遙;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)—成員交換對員工反生產(chǎn)行為的影響研究[D];沈陽航空航天大學(xué);2015年

4 肖方鑫;家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對公務(wù)員組織沉默的影響研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

5 黎洋宏;情緒智力對離職意向的影響：領(lǐng)導(dǎo)—成員交換的中介作用[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

6 王興超;道德推脫與員工道德決策的關(guān)系[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

7 黃雯;變革型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對公務(wù)員個體創(chuàng)新行為的影響研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

8 萬舒超;家長式領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、團(tuán)隊認(rèn)同、關(guān)系、團(tuán)隊公民行為作用機(jī)制研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

9 李妮;我國公務(wù)員職業(yè)道德失范的成因及對策研究[D];西北大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1725588