本文選題：上級(jí)　切入點(diǎn)：不當(dāng)督導(dǎo)行為　出處：《中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的:編制我國文化背景下上級(jí)不當(dāng)督導(dǎo)行為量表(ASBSS),并檢驗(yàn)其效度和信度。方法:結(jié)合文獻(xiàn)分析與32名企業(yè)員工的開放式問卷調(diào)查,構(gòu)建了ASBSS的理論維度,并在此基礎(chǔ)上編制初始問卷。選取200名企業(yè)員工,對于初始問卷進(jìn)行條目分析。選取445名企業(yè)員工,將其分為樣本1(n=223)和樣本2(n=222),樣本1用于探索性因子分析,樣本2用于驗(yàn)證性因子分析及信度分析,兩周后用樣本2進(jìn)行重測。結(jié)果:量表包含11個(gè)條目,分為忽視詆毀、蓄意阻撓及苛責(zé)下屬3個(gè)因子,解釋總變異的66.25%;量表具有良好的結(jié)構(gòu)效度(RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.92,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96)�？偭勘砑�3個(gè)因子的內(nèi)部一致性Cronbach α系數(shù)分別為0.87、0.79、0.78和0.76;重測信度分別為0.85、0.80、076和0.82。結(jié)論:本研究編制的上級(jí)不當(dāng)督導(dǎo)行為量表信效度達(dá)到了測量學(xué)的要求,可以用來測量中國文化背景下上級(jí)的不當(dāng)督導(dǎo)行為。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compile and test the validity and reliability of the superior improper supervision behavior scale under Chinese cultural background. Methods: the theoretical dimension of ASBSS was constructed based on literature analysis and an open questionnaire survey of 32 employees. On this basis, the initial questionnaire was compiled. 200 enterprise employees were selected, and the initial questionnaire was analyzed. 445 employees were selected and divided into two groups: sample 1 (nnnm223) and sample (2). Sample 1 was used for exploratory factor analysis. Sample 2 was used for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Two weeks later, sample 2 was re-tested. Results: the scale included 11 items, which were divided into three factors: neglect and slander, deliberate obstruction and exacting subordinates. There were good structural validity of RMSEAA 0.06GFI0.92CFI0.92CFI0.960.The internal consistency Cronbach 偽 coefficient of total scale and three factors were 0.870.79 0.78 and 0.76 respectively. The reliability of retest was 0.850.80076 and 0.82respectively. Conclusion: this study made the improper supervision behavior of superior in this study. The results showed that the internal consistency of the scale and the three factors were 0.87 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusion: the results of this study are as follows: the internal consistency of the total scale and the three factors are 0.87, 0.79, 0.78 and 0.76; the reliability of the scale is 0.850.80076 and 0.82respectively. The reliability and validity of the scale met the requirements of measurement. It can be used to measure the improper supervision behavior of the superior in the Chinese cultural background.
【作者單位】： 河南大學(xué)心理與行為研究所;輔仁藥業(yè)集團(tuán)人力資源部;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目(71171073)
【分類號(hào)】：C933
，

本文編號(hào)：1564731