本文選題：產權理論 + 發(fā)展��； 參考：《吉林大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2017年政府工作報告指出,國企改革仍是今年的重點工作之一,國企混合所有制改革是結構性供給側改革的主線。這說明國有企業(yè)改革的核心和主要內容是國有產權制度的改革,而產權制度改革當然要有科學的產權理論作為依據(jù)。從我國理論界看,近年來對產權理論進行了不少研究,也取得了不少成果,但還是有不少爭議,如產權的具體含義、產權制度類型及其選擇標準、產權具體的組織形式以及如何建立現(xiàn)代產權制度等問題上,有諸多歧見。本文用歷史的視角,辯證地闡述了產權理論發(fā)展的不同階段。作為一個相對完整的理論體系,產權理論是從馬克思主義經濟學誕生之后才有的,之后,新制度經濟學派對新古典經濟學進行了一些修正,將產權納入其分析框架,形成了西方產權理論。本文先考察了馬克思主義產權理論的產生和發(fā)展過程,詳細分析了不同階段馬克思有關產權思想的探索。其大體是從黑格爾的唯心哲學觀看待私有制轉向初步的唯物主義產權觀,再把對產權的研究從法學和哲學領域轉向經濟學領域,進而又在具體的社會歷史條件下對產權加深了認識,最后指出產權的真正本質是體現(xiàn)在社會生產關系中的,它是社會生產關系的總和,至此建立了產權分析的科學框架,并據(jù)此對資本主義私有制及其運動進行深刻的分析和批判,提出了公有制代替私有制是生產力發(fā)展的必然結果,是分工發(fā)展的必然要求。相應地,本文對西方產權理論的產生和發(fā)展也進行了追溯和梳理。古典經濟學家認為私有財產制度和自由放任的市場機制促進經濟增長,但之后的新古典經濟學家把私有財產的初始分配看成了經濟學分析前提而忽略了產權問題,由于新古典對現(xiàn)實經濟社會的解釋力太差,到20世紀30年代產權理論開始興起并形成,科斯的《企業(yè)的性質》發(fā)表標志著現(xiàn)代西方產權理論的系統(tǒng)提出,1960年他在《社會成本問題》中明確提出交易成本的概念,這本書的核心思想被后來的斯蒂格勒定義為科斯定理,科斯定理成為西方產權理論的核心,之后在科斯開辟的產權研究領域,一些西方學者又提出了現(xiàn)代企業(yè)理論和委托代理理論等。通過分析和對比馬克思主義產權理論和西方產權理論,不難發(fā)現(xiàn)馬克思產權理論的視角更廣,尤其是在揭示產權的本質和宏觀層面產權制度的發(fā)展規(guī)律上勝于西方產權理論,而西方產權理論以提高經濟績效為中心的產權權利束配置的思想完全可以在改變私有制的前提下為我所用。我國是社會主義國家,必須要保證社會主義基本經濟制度,所以要堅持公有產權的主體地位,同時引入多元產權主體,實現(xiàn)有效激勵和約束。國有企業(yè)可以發(fā)展由國有產權控股的混合所有制經濟,形成多元化的產權結構,提高經濟效率。國企產權改革還要加強核心性制度建設和支持性制度建設,降低委托——代理成本,創(chuàng)造出一種競爭性的制度環(huán)境,盤活國有經濟,使國有企業(yè)更好地實現(xiàn)經濟效益和擔當社會責任。
[Abstract]:The government work report in 2017 indicates that the reform of state-owned enterprises is still one of the key work of this year. The reform of the mixed ownership system of state-owned enterprises is the main line of structural supply side reform. This shows that the core and main content of the reform of state-owned enterprises is the reform of the state-owned property rights system, and the reform of the property right system should be based on the scientific property right theory. In the country's theoretical circle, many studies have been carried out on the theory of property rights in recent years, and many achievements have been made. However, there are still many disputes. There are many differences, such as the specific meaning of property right, the type of property right system and its selection criteria, the specific organization form of property right and how to establish the system of modern property rights. This paper expounds the different stages of the development of the theory of property rights. As a relatively complete theoretical system, the theory of property rights is only after the birth of Marx's economics. After that, new institutional economics has been revised to some new classical economics, and the property right is incorporated into its analytical framework and the western property rights theory has been formed. The process of the emergence and development of Marx's theory of property right is a detailed analysis of Marx's exploration of property rights in different stages. It is mainly from the idealism of Hagel's idealism to the initial materialist view of property rights, and then to the study of property rights from the field of law and philosophy to the field of economics, and then in particular. In the social and historical conditions, it deepened the understanding of property rights. Finally, it pointed out that the real essence of property right was embodied in the social production relationship. It was the sum of social production relations. At the point, the scientific framework of property right analysis was established. On this basis, the capitalist private system and its movement were deeply analyzed and criticized, and the public ownership was replaced by the private system. It is the inevitable result of the development of the productive forces and the inevitable requirement of the development of the division of labor. Accordingly, this article traces back and combs the emergence and development of the theory of western property rights. The classical economists believe that the private property system and the laissez faire market mechanism promote economic growth, but the new classical economists later put the initial private property. The initial distribution is regarded as the premise of economic analysis and neglects the problem of property rights. Because of the poor explanatory power of the neo classical to the real economy and society, the theory of property rights began to rise and form in 1930s. The character of Kos's "the nature of the enterprise" marks the system of modern western property theory. In 1960, he made sure that "the problem of social cost" was clearly mentioned. The concept of transaction cost, the core idea of this book was defined by later Stiegler as the Kos theorem, the Kos theorem became the core of the western property rights theory, and then in the field of property rights research opened by Kos, some western scholars have put forward the modern enterprise theory and the principal-agent theory. Through the analysis and comparison of Marx's property rights, some western scholars have analyzed and compared Marx's property rights. Theory and western property rights theory, it is not difficult to find that Marx's property right theory has a wider perspective, especially in the nature of property rights and the law of the development of property right system in the macro level, and the idea of the right bundle of property rights centered on the improvement of economic performance in western property rights theory can completely change private ownership. Under the premise, our country is a socialist country. We must guarantee the basic economic system of socialism. Therefore, we must adhere to the main position of public property rights, and introduce the subject of multiple property rights to achieve effective incentives and constraints. In order to improve economic efficiency, the reform of property rights of state-owned enterprises should also strengthen the construction of core system and support system, reduce the agency cost, create a competitive institutional environment, reactivate the state economy, and make the state-owned enterprises better economic benefits and responsibility for social responsibility.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F276.1;F271

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊衛(wèi)東;;國企改革與“再國有化”反思[J];華中師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2013年01期

2 楊承訓;;如何看待當前國企腐敗?[J];人民論壇;2012年15期

3 李云海;;產權理論的微觀基礎——西方產權理論與馬克思產權理論的差異分析[J];生產力研究;2010年11期

4 張宇;張晨;;“國有企業(yè)壟斷論”的謬誤[J];政治經濟學評論;2010年01期

5 彭勁松;;提升產業(yè)國際競爭力深化國企改革[J];理論前沿;2009年12期

6 庫向芳;張曉飛;;混合所有制經濟的產權特征和效率[J];現(xiàn)代企業(yè);2007年04期

7 何煉成;;國企改革中的學術爭鳴[J];中國經濟問題;2006年01期

8 程恩富;國企改革不要神化"私有產權作用"[J];上海國資;2004年12期

9 陳洪波;國資管理體制改革的地方實踐及啟示[J];宏觀經濟研究;2003年10期

10 王鈞;私有化、公司法和公司治理——評俄羅斯的私有化及其股份公司法[J];比較法研究;2003年04期

，

本文編號：2083065