本文選題：能源企業(yè) + 企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任��； 參考：《西南石油大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】："創(chuàng)新、協(xié)調(diào)、綠色、開放、共享"五大發(fā)展理念的產(chǎn)生使社會(huì)更加關(guān)注經(jīng)濟(jì)與綠色生態(tài)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展,由國(guó)家主導(dǎo),企業(yè)踐行的《企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任報(bào)告》時(shí)代的到來(lái)促進(jìn)了社會(huì)責(zé)任觀的發(fā)展。社會(huì)摒棄了以往"先污染,后治理"的經(jīng)濟(jì)模式,倡導(dǎo)企業(yè)積極履行社會(huì)責(zé)任,對(duì)企業(yè)利益相關(guān)者進(jìn)行積極有效的反饋。能源企業(yè),作為主要的工業(yè)生產(chǎn)性企業(yè),對(duì)環(huán)境、員工發(fā)展、生態(tài)的影響更大,更應(yīng)該主動(dòng)肩負(fù)起履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的重任,其履行社會(huì)責(zé)任意識(shí)的情況更應(yīng)該受到社會(huì)的重視。但是根據(jù)目前多項(xiàng)指標(biāo)顯示,能源企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任情況并不樂(lè)觀,根源在于履行社會(huì)責(zé)任意識(shí)淡薄,即使認(rèn)知到履行社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)社會(huì)環(huán)境有所改善,但是擔(dān)心因社會(huì)責(zé)任的支出影響企業(yè)的財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效而放棄承擔(dān)多方責(zé)任。本文以利益相關(guān)者理論、契約理論、信號(hào)傳遞理論為理論基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外研究學(xué)者的研究基礎(chǔ),對(duì)能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的內(nèi)涵(基于利益相關(guān)者理論)進(jìn)行界定,并通過(guò)因子分析最終確定了社會(huì)責(zé)任指標(biāo)。隨后在分析能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系時(shí)進(jìn)行了深入研究,并提出兩個(gè)假設(shè),即能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效有積極影響;當(dāng)期能源企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)滯后期財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效有顯著積極影響。最后以我國(guó)滬深兩市2011—2015年上市能源公司為研究樣本,對(duì)其公布的年度財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表及社會(huì)責(zé)任報(bào)告書的數(shù)據(jù),綜合運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)、會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)等學(xué)科知識(shí),采用規(guī)范性與實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合的方法對(duì)上述假設(shè)進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。研究結(jié)果顯示當(dāng)期能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)當(dāng)期財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效影響積極作用不明顯;通過(guò)面板數(shù)據(jù)的固態(tài)效應(yīng)滯后函數(shù)分析發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)期能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)滯后期財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效有積極影響;能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任指標(biāo)之間存在影響差異,在當(dāng)期以及滯后期,對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的影響有著各自的發(fā)展路徑�；诖�,本文建議提高能源企業(yè)踐行社會(huì)責(zé)任內(nèi)部管理層共識(shí),推進(jìn)能源企業(yè)對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任履行情況進(jìn)行自我評(píng)價(jià),加強(qiáng)社會(huì)責(zé)任履行的自愿主動(dòng)性,從內(nèi)在機(jī)制上轉(zhuǎn)變其履責(zé)意識(shí)。其次從外部環(huán)境來(lái)說(shuō),建議加強(qiáng)監(jiān)管力度,構(gòu)建社會(huì)責(zé)任履行獎(jiǎng)懲機(jī)制;積極完善企業(yè)評(píng)價(jià)體系,健全企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露制度;利用相關(guān)財(cái)稅制度,推動(dòng)社會(huì)責(zé)任實(shí)施外部環(huán)境。通過(guò)內(nèi)外政策措施,達(dá)到解決能源企業(yè)承擔(dān)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效影響滯后問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:The emergence of the five development concepts of "innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing" has made the society pay more attention to the sustainable development of economy and green ecology, and be led by the state. The era of corporate social responsibility report has promoted the development of the concept of social responsibility. The society abandons the former economic model of "pollution first, then governs", advocates the enterprises to fulfill their social responsibility actively, and gives positive and effective feedback to the stakeholders of the enterprises. Energy enterprises, as the main industrial productive enterprises, have greater influence on environment, employee development and ecology, and should take the responsibility of performing social responsibility on their own initiative, and their social responsibility should be paid more attention to. However, according to a number of current indicators, the performance of social responsibility in energy enterprises is not optimistic. The root cause is a weak sense of social responsibility, even if it is recognized that the implementation of social responsibility has improved the social environment. But fear of social responsibility spending affect corporate financial performance and give up the responsibility. Based on stakeholder theory, contract theory and signal transmission theory, this paper defines the connotation of energy corporate social responsibility (based on stakeholder theory) in combination with the research basis of domestic and foreign scholars. Finally, the social responsibility index is determined by factor analysis. Then it makes a deep study on the relationship between energy corporate social responsibility and financial performance, and puts forward two hypotheses, that is, energy corporate social responsibility has a positive impact on financial performance; The performance of current energy enterprises' social responsibility has a significant positive impact on lag financial performance. Finally, taking the energy companies listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2011-2015 as the research sample, the data of the annual financial statements and social responsibility reports published by the companies are comprehensively applied to the knowledge of statistics, accounting and other disciplines. The above hypothesis is analyzed empirically by the combination of normative and empirical research. The results show that the impact of current energy corporate social responsibility on the current financial performance is not obvious; through the panel data solid effect lag function analysis found that the current energy corporate social responsibility has a positive impact on the lag financial performance; There are influence differences among the indicators of energy corporate social responsibility. In the current period and the lag period, the impact on financial performance has its own development path. Based on this, this paper suggests to improve the internal consensus of the management of social responsibility, to promote the self-evaluation of the performance of social responsibility, and to strengthen the voluntary initiative of social responsibility performance. Change its duty consciousness from the internal mechanism. Secondly, from the external environment, it is suggested to strengthen supervision, construct the mechanism of reward and punishment of social responsibility; actively improve the evaluation system of enterprises, improve the disclosure system of corporate social responsibility information; use the relevant financial and tax system, Promote the implementation of social responsibility external environment. Through internal and external policies and measures to solve the energy enterprises to bear corporate social responsibility on financial performance lag problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F270;F426.2;F406.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 駱勤勤;;經(jīng)濟(jì)新常態(tài)下我國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究——以雀巢(中國(guó))公司為例[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2016年21期

2 周麗萍;陳燕;金玉健;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于企業(yè)聲譽(yù)視角的分析解釋[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年03期

3 楊皖蘇;楊善林;;中國(guó)情境下企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的對(duì)比分析[J];中國(guó)管理科學(xué);2016年01期

4 陳小平;;創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司高管持股與公司價(jià)值——基于區(qū)間效用論的實(shí)證研究[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;2015年21期

5 王風(fēng)華;;利益相關(guān)者視角的能源企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任評(píng)價(jià)體系設(shè)計(jì)[J];新會(huì)計(jì);2015年10期

6 竇鑫豐;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效影響的滯后效應(yīng)——基于滬深上市公司面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年03期

7 田利軍;陳甜甜;;企業(yè)內(nèi)部控制、社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

8 尹開國(guó);施婷婷;汪瑩瑩;;利益相關(guān)者對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露影響研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2015年01期

9 陳煦江;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任影響財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的中介調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)——基于中國(guó)100強(qiáng)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任發(fā)展指數(shù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

10 齊殿偉;諾敏;王玉姣;;我國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效影響研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2013年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王宛央;金屬冶煉上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任和財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效關(guān)系的研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2031557