本文選題：家族涉入 + 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,家族企業(yè)重新出現(xiàn),煥發(fā)了蓬勃生機。家族企業(yè)面臨"家業(yè)長青"的重大問題,而技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是家族企業(yè)得以可持續(xù)發(fā)展的重要保障,這使得對家族企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新問題的研究兼具學(xué)術(shù)意義與實踐意義。研究已經(jīng)關(guān)注到該問題,并進行了一定探索,但仍存在較少關(guān)注相悖理論與研究情境等等不足。因此,本文選取中國大陸A股上市的數(shù)據(jù),分析并檢驗家族涉入與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新投入的直接關(guān)系,并從戰(zhàn)略選項與治理結(jié)構(gòu)兩個角度,實證分析可能的情境因素。上述研究設(shè)計一定程度上彌補了現(xiàn)有研究的不足。為深入理解家族企業(yè)及其技術(shù)創(chuàng)新問題,本文首先收集國內(nèi)外家族企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新領(lǐng)域經(jīng)典文獻,按照一定的邏輯梳理這些文獻涉及的家族涉入方式,并總結(jié)現(xiàn)有研究對于家族企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新問題的結(jié)論。進一步地,本文從家族涉入與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新直接關(guān)系的沖突觀點整合、企業(yè)其他戰(zhàn)略選項的調(diào)節(jié)作用以及企業(yè)治理因素的調(diào)節(jié)作用三個方面,展開論述并提出本文的研究假設(shè)。通過一定標準,本文選擇了 1769個中國A股上市公司觀測值作為研究樣本。通過相關(guān)性分析、多元回歸分析等手段,本文發(fā)現(xiàn):首先,盡管存在相悖的邏輯,但家族涉入與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新存在顯著的負相關(guān)關(guān)系,即企業(yè)"家族性"越強,技術(shù)創(chuàng)新水平越低;其次,國際化戰(zhàn)略對主效應(yīng)存在調(diào)節(jié)作用,在國際化程度較深的企業(yè),家族涉入對技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的抑制作用較輕;第三,人力資本冗余程度對主效應(yīng)有調(diào)節(jié)作用,在人力資本較豐沛的企業(yè),家族涉入對技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的抑制作用較輕;第四,治理情境復(fù)雜性對主效應(yīng)有調(diào)節(jié)作用,在董事會外部性比較高的企業(yè),家族涉入對技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的抑制作用較重;最后,期望績效差距對主效應(yīng)存在二次調(diào)節(jié)作用,在績效不滿期望的企業(yè),董事會外部性抑制主效應(yīng)的程度更深。進一步檢驗的結(jié)果顯示上述結(jié)論比較穩(wěn)健。本文主要創(chuàng)新點在于:第一,充分梳理家族企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新邏輯的相悖兩面,并以實證證據(jù)對其凈效應(yīng)予以驗證,較好地彌合了沖突的觀點;第二,豐富對影響家族企業(yè)創(chuàng)新活動調(diào)節(jié)因素的認識,并證明家族涉入導(dǎo)致企業(yè)決策偏離經(jīng)濟目標,為控制家族將保護情感目標視為決策參照點的觀點提供新的經(jīng)驗證據(jù);第三,兼顧血緣與中國傳統(tǒng)"禮法",基于"親等"概念,構(gòu)建了針對控制家族而言的治理情境復(fù)雜性的衡量方式;第四,發(fā)現(xiàn)了行為代理理論的一條適用邊界:通過對立假設(shè),發(fā)現(xiàn)行為代理理論可能更適用于股權(quán)分散的或所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)充分分離的情況,而當企業(yè)內(nèi)治理情況復(fù)雜時,其解釋有效性就會受到局限。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the family business reappeared, coruscating vitality. Family business is faced with the important problem of "family evergreen", and technological innovation is an important guarantee for the sustainable development of family business, which makes the research on technology innovation of family business have both academic and practical significance. The research has paid attention to this problem, and has made some exploration, but there are still some shortcomings such as paying less attention to the contrary theory and the research situation and so on. Therefore, this paper selects the data of A-share listing in mainland China, analyzes and tests the direct relationship between family involvement and enterprise technological innovation investment, and empirically analyzes the possible situational factors from the perspective of strategic options and governance structure. To some extent, the above research design makes up for the deficiency of the existing research. In order to deeply understand the family business and its technological innovation, this paper firstly collects the classical literature in the field of technology innovation of family business at home and abroad, and combs the family involvement mode involved in these documents according to certain logic. And summarizes the existing research on the family business technology innovation conclusions. Furthermore, this paper discusses and puts forward the research hypotheses from three aspects: the conflict point of view of the direct relationship between family involvement and enterprise technological innovation, the regulatory role of other strategic options and the regulatory role of corporate governance factors. According to certain standards, 1769 Chinese A-share listed companies are selected as the research samples. By means of correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis, this paper finds that, first of all, despite the existence of contradictory logic, there is a significant negative correlation between family involvement and enterprise technological innovation, that is, the stronger the "familial" enterprise is, The lower the level of technological innovation, the lower the level of technological innovation. Secondly, the internationalization strategy has a moderating effect on the main effect, and in the enterprises with deeper degree of internationalization, the family involvement has a less inhibitory effect on technological innovation. Third, The degree of redundancy of human capital has a regulating effect on the main effect. In the enterprises with abundant human capital, the family involvement has a less inhibitory effect on technological innovation. Fourth, the complexity of governance situation has a regulating effect on the main effect. In the enterprises with high externality of the board of directors, the family involvement has a heavy inhibitory effect on technological innovation. Finally, the expected performance gap has a secondary role in regulating the main effect, while in the enterprises with unsatisfactory performance expectations, there is a secondary role in regulating the main effect. The externality of the board inhibits the main effect to a greater extent. The results of further tests show that the above conclusions are relatively robust. The main innovation points of this paper are as follows: first, combing the contradictory two sides of the logic of technological innovation in family enterprises, and validating its net effect with empirical evidence, which has better bridged the viewpoint of conflict; second, It enriches the understanding of the factors that influence the regulation of the innovation activities of the family business, and proves that the family involvement leads to the deviation of the business decision from the economic goal, which provides new empirical evidence for the control family to regard the protection of emotional goal as the reference point of the decision; third, Considering consanguinity and Chinese traditional "etiquette law", based on the concept of "kinship", this paper constructs a measure of the complexity of governance situation for the control family. It is found that the behavioral agency theory may be more suitable for the situation of decentralized ownership or separation of ownership and management, but when the internal governance situation is complex, the effectiveness of its interpretation will be limited.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F273.1;F832.51

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何學(xué)林;;脫離家族管理 走向規(guī)模發(fā)展[J];新經(jīng)濟;2001年08期

2 馬萬民,韓之俊;江蘇鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)的家族管理模式及其改進[J];江蘇商論;2002年06期

3 董明;私營企業(yè)家族管理模式評析[J];湖北省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

4 何圣東,王明琳;從家族管理走向現(xiàn)代管理[J];改革與理論;2002年03期

5 何圣東,王明琳;家族管理:弊端與嬗變[J];理論與改革;2002年02期

6 饒莉;改良民營企業(yè)的家族管理[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2003年08期

7 畢錦云;家族管理的未來之路[J];草原稅務(wù);2003年06期

8 麥哲;;中國式家族管理十大劣根[J];價格與市場;2007年05期

9 馬新莉;;算一算:你的企業(yè)“家族傳承指數(shù)”是多少?[J];商學(xué)院;2012年11期

10 王虹;民營企業(yè)家族管理:是耶非耶?[J];中國工商;1998年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前7條

1 周陽敏;;現(xiàn)代企業(yè)后家族管理引論[A];管理科學(xué)與系統(tǒng)科學(xué)研究新進展——第6屆全國青年管理科學(xué)與系統(tǒng)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議暨中國科協(xié)第4屆青年學(xué)術(shù)年會衛(wèi)星會議論文集[C];2001年

2 龍麗群;;家族控制實現(xiàn)機制:理論、實踐與啟示[A];第五屆（2010）中國管理學(xué)年會——公司治理分會場論文集[C];2010年

3 賀小剛;連燕玲;張遠飛;;家族內(nèi)部權(quán)力集中度、偏離度與治理效率——基于家族上市公司的實證研究[A];上海市經(jīng)濟學(xué)會學(xué)術(shù)年刊（2010）[C];2010年

4 朱沆;黃婷;韓曉燕;;家族涉入管理存在外部性嗎?關(guān)系比較與職業(yè)經(jīng)理的心理所有權(quán)[A];第八屆（2013）中國管理學(xué)年會——創(chuàng)業(yè)與中小企業(yè)管理分會場論文集[C];2013年

5 鄭耀群;王安民;李晉堯;;我國家族企業(yè)的管理創(chuàng)新模式——后家族管理[A];全國第九屆企業(yè)信息化與工業(yè)工程學(xué)術(shù)會議論文集[C];2005年

6 陳瑛s，

本文編號：1819356