本文選題：再融資　切入點(diǎn)：H公司　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的證券市場隨著資本市場建立之后迅速發(fā)展,融資作為證券市場活躍的一種交易方式也迅速發(fā)展著。上市公司首次公開募股后獲得資金來發(fā)展企業(yè),在遇到資金瓶頸時(shí)再融資也成了企業(yè)發(fā)展的必經(jīng)之路。再融資方式發(fā)展之初還只有配股一種方式,后續(xù)發(fā)展成為了配股、增發(fā)和可轉(zhuǎn)債等多種方式。特別是股權(quán)分置改革之后定向增發(fā)這種股權(quán)再融資方式得到了迅猛發(fā)展,從2015年的統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)來看,定增市場總募集金額超過了12億元,創(chuàng)造了新的記錄。本文翻閱和整理相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和資料,采用案例研究和理論研究相結(jié)合的方法,在相關(guān)理論分析基礎(chǔ)上,簡單回顧了我國再融資制度的變遷,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國關(guān)于再融資的政策要求在逐步完善的基礎(chǔ)上均有所放松,每個(gè)階段有著不同類型的股權(quán)再融資充當(dāng)主角,文章選取的時(shí)間段是在2006年股權(quán)分置改革后至今以定增作為主要的股權(quán)再融資的時(shí)期。在文獻(xiàn)方面,梳理了關(guān)于融資理論、股權(quán)再融資偏好、股權(quán)再融資對績效影響、業(yè)績評價(jià)體系研究文獻(xiàn)。目前,已有大量實(shí)證研究證明我國上市公司有股權(quán)再融資偏好。股權(quán)再融資后,上市公司業(yè)績出現(xiàn)顯著下滑,并且有特定項(xiàng)目的再融資業(yè)績下滑的程度要小于沒有特定項(xiàng)目的股權(quán)再融資;但具體關(guān)于不同股權(quán)再融資后如何影響企業(yè)績效的案例研究還比較少。文章選取以定向增發(fā)為主可轉(zhuǎn)債為輔的H公司作為研究對象,對案例公司的股權(quán)再融資是否也存在著上述問題展開了研究。文章通過合理設(shè)計(jì)績效的財(cái)務(wù)評估方法與績效評價(jià)指標(biāo)的構(gòu)建,通過分析H公司兩種股權(quán)再融資前后業(yè)績變化,剖析H公司股權(quán)再融資與績效的關(guān)系。通過對H公司股權(quán)再融資前后的財(cái)務(wù)績效指標(biāo)分析得出發(fā)行可轉(zhuǎn)債會使企業(yè)的盈利能力、償債能力和成長能力降低,而有特定項(xiàng)目增發(fā)可以提高企業(yè)的盈利能力、償債能力和資產(chǎn)質(zhì)量,沒有特定項(xiàng)目的定向增發(fā)會使企業(yè)的盈利能力、資產(chǎn)質(zhì)量和成長能力降低。即發(fā)行可轉(zhuǎn)債和沒有特定項(xiàng)目的定向增發(fā)會使企業(yè)的財(cái)務(wù)績效指標(biāo)下滑,而發(fā)行有特定項(xiàng)目的定向增發(fā)沒有使企業(yè)的財(cái)務(wù)績效指標(biāo)產(chǎn)生明顯下滑,還提高了H公司的業(yè)績。在市場績效方面,定向增發(fā)和發(fā)行可轉(zhuǎn)債方式都能帶來良好的市場反應(yīng),提高H公司的市場績效。在非財(cái)務(wù)績效方面,股權(quán)再融資對H公司的市場份額可以帶來促進(jìn)作用。文章根據(jù)結(jié)論提出相應(yīng)的對策,從而幫助企業(yè)更好的完善股權(quán)再融資,確保再融資的有效進(jìn)行,對H公司后續(xù)進(jìn)行股權(quán)再融資具有一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:With the establishment of the capital market, China's securities market is developing rapidly, and financing as an active trading mode in the securities market is also developing rapidly.After the initial public offering of listed companies to obtain funds to develop enterprises, refinancing in the face of capital bottlenecks has become the only way to the development of enterprises.At the beginning of the development of refinancing, there was only one way of rights issue, followed by a variety of ways, such as rights issue, additional issuance and convertible bonds.Especially after the reform of split share structure, the refinancing method of directional additional issuance has been developed rapidly. According to the statistical data in 2015, the total amount raised in the fixed increase market has exceeded 1.2 billion yuan, which has set a new record.This paper reviews and collates the relevant documents and materials, adopts the method of case study and theoretical research, and on the basis of relevant theoretical analysis, briefly reviews the changes of the refinancing system in China.It is found that China's policy on refinancing is relaxed on the basis of gradual improvement, with different types of equity refinancing playing the leading role in each stage.The time period chosen in this paper is fixed increase as the main period of equity refinancing after the split share structure reform in 2006.In the aspect of literature, the research literature on financing theory, equity refinancing preference, equity refinancing influence on performance, performance evaluation system is reviewed.At present, a large number of empirical studies have proved that China's listed companies have equity refinancing preferences.After equity refinancing, the performance of listed companies declined significantly, and the degree of decline of refinancing performance of specific projects was less than that of equity refinancing without specific projects.However, there are few case studies on how to affect corporate performance after different equity refinancing.This paper selects H Company, which is mainly supplemented by directional additional issuance, as the research object, and studies whether the equity refinancing of the case company also has the above problems.This paper analyzes the relationship between H company's equity refinancing and performance by analyzing the changes of performance before and after H company's two kinds of equity refinancing through reasonably designing the financial evaluation method of performance and the construction of performance evaluation index.Based on the analysis of financial performance indexes before and after H company's equity refinancing, it is concluded that issuing convertible bonds will reduce the profitability, solvency and growth ability of enterprises, and that additional issuance of specific items can improve the profitability of enterprises.The ability to repay debt and the quality of assets, without a specific item of targeted issuance, will reduce the profitability, asset quality and growth ability of the enterprise.That is to say, issuing convertible bonds and issuing additional issuance without specific items will cause the financial performance index of the enterprise to decline, but the issuance of a specific item of the issuance of the targeted issuance of the financial performance index does not cause a significant decline, but also improve the performance of H company.In terms of market performance, both directional issuance and issuance of convertible bonds can bring good market response and improve H company's market performance.In non-financial performance, equity refinancing can promote H company's market share.According to the conclusion, the paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures to help the enterprise to perfect equity refinancing better, to ensure the effective implementation of refinancing, and to provide some reference for H company to carry out equity refinancing in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F406.7;F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田寶新;王建瓊;;上市公司再融資與股利政策的市場反應(yīng)實(shí)證研究[J];中國軟科學(xué);2016年07期

2 陳艷;李鑫;李孟順;;現(xiàn)金股利迎合、再融資需求與企業(yè)投資——投資效率視角下的半強(qiáng)制分紅政策有效性研究[J];會計(jì)研究;2015年11期

3 王東升;劉立濤;倫崇寧;;上市公司配股融資與增發(fā)融資比較[J];財(cái)會通訊;2015年29期

4 鄧路;王化成;;投資者異質(zhì)信念與定向增發(fā)股價(jià)長期市場表現(xiàn)[J];會計(jì)研究;2014年11期

5 牛彥秀;吉玖男;;上市公司股權(quán)再融資的市場時(shí)機(jī)選擇實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理評論;2014年04期

6 陳文;王飛;;負(fù)債融資約束與中國上市公司股權(quán)融資偏好[J];投資研究;2013年07期

7 凌江懷;胡雯蓉;;企業(yè)規(guī)模、融資結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)營績效——基于戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)和傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)對比的研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年12期

8 李傳憲;朱渝;;民營上市公司資本結(jié)構(gòu)與股權(quán)再融資績效[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2011年09期

9 李增福;鄭友環(huán);連玉君;;股權(quán)再融資、盈余管理與上市公司業(yè)績滑坡——基于應(yīng)計(jì)項(xiàng)目操控與真實(shí)活動操控方式下的研究[J];中國管理科學(xué);2011年02期

10 付雷鳴;萬迪f ;張雅慧;;融資優(yōu)序理論新證:公司債、可轉(zhuǎn)債和增發(fā)股票宣告效應(yīng)的比較分析[J];金融評論;2011年01期

，

本文編號：1719088