發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-08 16:13

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)以來(lái)，為了爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn)略資源和21世紀(jì)金融業(yè)主導(dǎo)權(quán)，許多銀行將戰(zhàn)略重點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移到外部擴(kuò)展上，通過(guò)不遺余力地兼并重組，以獲取競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)。隨著國(guó)際化并購(gòu)重組規(guī)模的不斷壯大，銀行業(yè)已逐步成為全球并購(gòu)市場(chǎng)的熱點(diǎn)行業(yè)。近年來(lái)中資銀行也在積極探索其國(guó)際化之路，并且在海外并購(gòu)方面進(jìn)行了嘗試。本文通過(guò)分析中資銀行海外并購(gòu)對(duì)其經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效的影響，來(lái)進(jìn)一步探討如何通過(guò)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)其經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效的提高，以求促進(jìn)中資銀行并購(gòu)活動(dòng)的有序開展，不斷提升中資銀行的核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。這也是順應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)、金融全球化發(fā)展趨勢(shì)，，符合中國(guó)國(guó)家政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的。 論文首先對(duì)銀行并購(gòu)的基本含義作了界定，并以此為基礎(chǔ)對(duì)上世紀(jì)三次銀行并購(gòu)進(jìn)行基本分析。 為了把握宏觀環(huán)境因素對(duì)中資銀行海外并購(gòu)的影響，論文對(duì)中資銀行并購(gòu)所面臨的宏觀環(huán)境進(jìn)行了分析，以提高中資銀行并購(gòu)效率。借鑒英國(guó)學(xué)者格里·約翰遜（GerryJohnson）和凱萬(wàn)·斯科爾斯（Kevan Schole）1998年在其著作《公司戰(zhàn)略教程》中提出的PEST分析法,分別從政治或法律因素（politics）、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素（econom）、社會(huì)文化因素（society）和技術(shù)因素（technology）這四方面來(lái)著手建構(gòu)中資銀行海外并購(gòu)的宏觀環(huán)境因素。通過(guò)分析驗(yàn)證宏觀環(huán)境對(duì)銀行并購(gòu)效率的影響。 論文對(duì)中資銀行海外并購(gòu)效率進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析。運(yùn)用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法（DEA）對(duì)并購(gòu)案例進(jìn)行分析，實(shí)證結(jié)果表明中資銀行的成本效率在海外并購(gòu)前后與時(shí)間的變化相互交錯(cuò)在一起，海外并購(gòu)對(duì)中資銀行的成本效率并沒有明顯的促進(jìn)作用，反而由于并購(gòu)后整合出現(xiàn)問題其成本效率有所降低，但并不明顯。 基于前面分析的結(jié)論，論文對(duì)中資銀行海外并購(gòu)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了總結(jié)闡述。并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了提高中資銀行海外并購(gòu)效率的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, in order to compete for the strategic resources and the dominant power of the financial industry in the 21st century, many banks have shifted their strategic emphasis to the external expansion, and spared no effort to acquire the competitive advantage by annexing and reorganizing. With the expansion of the scale of international M & A, the banking industry has gradually become a hot industry in the global M & A market. In recent years, Chinese banks are actively exploring the way of internationalization, and have made attempts in overseas mergers and acquisitions. By analyzing the influence of overseas M & A of Chinese banks on their business performance, this paper further discusses how to improve their business performance through cross-border M & A, in order to promote the orderly development of M & A activities of Chinese banks. Improve the core competitiveness of Chinese banks. This is also in line with the trend of economic and financial globalization, in line with China's national political and economic interests. Firstly, the paper defines the basic meaning of bank M & A, and analyzes the three M & A in the last century. In order to grasp the impact of macro environmental factors on overseas mergers and acquisitions of Chinese banks, this paper analyzes the macro environment faced by Chinese banks' mergers and acquisitions in order to improve the efficiency of mergers and acquisitions of Chinese banks. Based on the analysis of PEST proposed by British scholars Gerry Johnson (GerryJohnson) and Keven Scholes (Kevan Schole) in their 1998 book "A tutorial on Corporate Strategy", this paper analyzes the political or legal factors of (politics), economic factor (econom), respectively. The social and cultural factors (society) and the technical factor (technology) are four aspects to construct the macro environmental factors of overseas M & A of Chinese banks. Through analysis to verify the impact of macro environment on the efficiency of bank mergers and acquisitions. This paper makes an empirical analysis on the efficiency of overseas mergers and acquisitions of Chinese banks. The empirical results show that the cost efficiency of Chinese banks is intertwined with time before and after overseas mergers and acquisitions by using data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Overseas M & A has no obvious promoting effect on the cost efficiency of Chinese banks. On the contrary, the cost efficiency of overseas M & A is lower than that of Chinese banks due to the problem of integration after merger and acquisition, but it is not obvious. Based on the conclusions of the previous analysis, the paper summarizes the status of overseas M & A of Chinese banks. On this basis, the paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to improve the efficiency of overseas mergers and acquisitions of Chinese banks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.2;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王保忠;銀行并購(gòu)微觀效應(yīng)分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2004年05期

2 馬君潞;陳科;呂劍;馮學(xué)峰;;基于SFA方法的亞洲新興市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體銀行并購(gòu)效率研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年02期

3 林炳文;銀行并購(gòu)與效率之分析:SFC與DEA方法之比較[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年01期

4 史小坤;趙仲良;;基于SFA法的商業(yè)銀行成本效率研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2009年07期

5 鄭良芳;;國(guó)際銀行業(yè)并購(gòu)潮的回顧與啟迪[J];河南金融管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

6 歐振坤;百年來(lái)的日本銀行業(yè)并購(gòu)及啟示[J];華南金融研究;2002年04期

7 遲國(guó)泰,孫秀峰,蘆丹;中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行成本效率實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年06期

8 張健華;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行效率研究的DEA方法及1997-2001年效率的實(shí)證分析[J];金融研究;2003年03期

9 徐小平;馬啟強(qiáng);;基于DEA方法的中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行并購(gòu)效率的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];學(xué)理論;2008年22期

10 錢蓁;中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行的效率研究——SFA方法分析[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 周小春;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行并購(gòu)與效率獲利的實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2003年

2 苗娜;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行并購(gòu)效率的實(shí)證分析[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2007年

3 秦利靜;國(guó)際銀行業(yè)并購(gòu)的動(dòng)因和績(jī)效研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

4 禹靜靜;我國(guó)銀行業(yè)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)戰(zhàn)略研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

5 張震海;我國(guó)銀行業(yè)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)動(dòng)因與效率研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

6 孫超;銀行跨國(guó)并購(gòu)績(jī)效研究[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2368629