【摘要】：地方政府的投融資平臺(tái)作為最活躍、最值得關(guān)注的融資主體,引起國(guó)內(nèi)各界人士的廣泛關(guān)注。國(guó)務(wù)院于2010年6月份頒發(fā)了國(guó)發(fā)[2010]19號(hào)文件“國(guó)務(wù)院關(guān)于加強(qiáng)地方政府融資平臺(tái)公司管理有關(guān)問(wèn)題的通知”,為了進(jìn)一步落實(shí)國(guó)發(fā)[2010]19號(hào)文件精神,降低政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),本文基于地方政府及政府行政主管部門(mén)的視角,對(duì)地方政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行研究。 本文從國(guó)內(nèi)外政府投融資以及國(guó)內(nèi)外績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)兩個(gè)方面的研究現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)地方政府投融資平臺(tái)目前面臨的困境,并指出地方政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)發(fā)展的出路,建立地方政府投融資績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究體系,結(jié)合委托代理理論、目標(biāo)管理理論、利益相關(guān)者理論、平衡計(jì)分卡理論等,提出以地方政府投融資戰(zhàn)略為目標(biāo),構(gòu)建以地方政府投融資目標(biāo)為戰(zhàn)略導(dǎo)向的地方政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)平衡計(jì)分卡,對(duì)平衡計(jì)分卡四個(gè)視角進(jìn)行了相應(yīng)的調(diào)整,最后確定了從完成政府使命、財(cái)務(wù)方面、內(nèi)部制度建設(shè)和工作流程、學(xué)習(xí)與成長(zhǎng)四個(gè)視角對(duì)地方政府投融資績(jī)效進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),從體現(xiàn)完成政府投融資建設(shè)、投資、融資、償還一體化的總目標(biāo)出發(fā),提出15個(gè)既有定量又有定性的關(guān)鍵績(jī)效指標(biāo)和44個(gè)相對(duì)應(yīng)的一級(jí)指標(biāo),從空間和時(shí)間上覆蓋了政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)項(xiàng)目投資、融資、使用、償還的各個(gè)相關(guān)部門(mén)及個(gè)人的各個(gè)時(shí)間節(jié)點(diǎn)和工作節(jié)點(diǎn)。 通過(guò)發(fā)放調(diào)查問(wèn)卷以及對(duì)投融資機(jī)構(gòu)的專家進(jìn)行訪談,利用層次分析法對(duì)各個(gè)關(guān)鍵績(jī)效指標(biāo)以及對(duì)應(yīng)的一級(jí)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行權(quán)重分析,最后運(yùn)用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)地方政府投融資績(jī)效進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià),建立適應(yīng)我國(guó)國(guó)情的地方政府投融資績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系。以沈陽(yáng)市政府為例,結(jié)合沈陽(yáng)市政府的實(shí)際情況,構(gòu)建沈陽(yáng)市地方政府投融資績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系。 該評(píng)價(jià)體系設(shè)立對(duì)于建立科學(xué)、規(guī)范的政府投融資管理工作體系,完善政府投融資工作運(yùn)行機(jī)制具有重要現(xiàn)實(shí)意義；有助于政府實(shí)時(shí)、動(dòng)態(tài)的掌握政府資源配置情況,規(guī)范政府融資與債務(wù)管理工作,防范政府債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；有助于做大做強(qiáng)政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu),促進(jìn)地方政府投融資機(jī)構(gòu)的發(fā)展。通過(guò)建立政府投融資管理績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系為政府考核投融資機(jī)構(gòu)經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)提供重要依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The investment and financing platform of local government as the most active and most worthy of attention has attracted wide attention from people from all walks of life in China. In June 2010, the State Council issued document No. 19 of Guofa [2010] "the State Council Circular on strengthening the Management of Local Government financing platform companies." in order to further implement the spirit of document No. 19 of Guofa [2010], To reduce the debt risk of government investment and financing institutions, this paper studies the performance evaluation of local government investment and financing institutions from the perspective of local governments and government administrative departments. Based on the research status of domestic and foreign government investment and financing and performance evaluation at home and abroad, this paper finds out the plight of local government investment and financing platform in China, and points out the way out for the development of local government investment and financing institutions. Establishing the research system of local government investment and financing performance evaluation, combining the principal-agent theory, objective management theory, stakeholder theory, balanced scorecard theory and so on, put forward the local government investment and financing strategy as the goal. This paper constructs the balanced Scorecard of local government investment and financing institutions, which is guided by the goal of local government investment and financing, and adjusts the four perspectives of balanced Scorecard accordingly. Finally, it determines from the completion of the government mission, financial aspects, This paper evaluates the performance of local government investment and financing from the four perspectives of internal system construction and work flow, learning and growth, and starts from the overall goal of completing the integration of government investment and financing, investment, financing and repayment. The paper puts forward 15 key performance indicators with both quantitative and qualitative characteristics and 44 corresponding first-level indicators, which cover the investment, financing and use of projects of government investment and financing institutions in space and time. Each time node and work node of each relevant department and individual reimbursed. By issuing questionnaires and interviewing experts from investment and financing institutions, the paper uses AHP to analyze the weights of key performance indicators and corresponding first-level indicators. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the investment and financing performance of local government, and the evaluation system of local government investment and financing performance adapted to the situation of our country is established. Taking Shenyang Municipal Government as an example and combining the actual situation of Shenyang Municipal Government, a performance evaluation system of local government investment and financing in Shenyang City is constructed. The establishment of the evaluation system is of great practical significance for the establishment of a scientific and standardized government investment and financing management system and the improvement of the operating mechanism of the government investment and financing work. It is helpful for the government to grasp the allocation of government resources in real time and dynamically, standardize the work of government financing and debt management, prevent the risk of government debt, and promote the development of local government investment and financing institutions. The establishment of government investment and financing management performance evaluation system provides an important basis for the government to assess the operating performance of investment and financing institutions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙蕊;;關(guān)注政府融資平臺(tái)發(fā)展新趨勢(shì)[J];銀行家;2009年11期

2 占美松;;財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)概念框架與公司層次業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系——業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)研究思路的構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2008年01期

3 余萍;;地方政府投融資平臺(tái)建設(shè)研究[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年05期

4 馬海濤;鄧?guó)欀?任文;;后金融危機(jī)時(shí)期我國(guó)地方政府投融資管理機(jī)制問(wèn)題研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2010年10期

5 馬海濤;秦強(qiáng);;完善制度建設(shè),加強(qiáng)政府投融資平臺(tái)管理[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2010年01期

6 巴曙松;;地方政府投融資平臺(tái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估[J];經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年09期

7 常友玲;仲旭;鄭改玲;;我國(guó)地方政府投融資平臺(tái)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2010年05期

8 熊盛文;;政府投融資平臺(tái)要在規(guī)范中實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];金融與經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

9 中國(guó)人民銀行南昌中心支行課題組;劉居照;吳霞;;關(guān)于江西政府投融資平臺(tái)貸款情況的調(diào)查[J];金融與經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

10 谷祺,于東智;EVA財(cái)務(wù)管理系統(tǒng)的理論分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2000年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳衛(wèi);企業(yè)培訓(xùn)的績(jī)效評(píng)估[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2319435