【摘要】：裝備制造業(yè)是國(guó)家的戰(zhàn)略性產(chǎn)業(yè),現(xiàn)有的實(shí)證研究沒有解釋FDI對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)是否產(chǎn)生了正的溢出效應(yīng)。本文利用2001-2007年中國(guó)31個(gè)省市自治區(qū)裝備制造業(yè)內(nèi)部七個(gè)部門的面板數(shù)據(jù),通過普通最小二乘法和固定效應(yīng)模型估計(jì)得出:FDI顯著地促進(jìn)了我國(guó)裝備制造業(yè)的增長(zhǎng),這種正的溢出效應(yīng)是直接并通過影響勞動(dòng)要素間接地實(shí)現(xiàn)的。在七個(gè)部門內(nèi)部FDI正的溢出效應(yīng)沒有明顯的差別,但是地區(qū)之間的差異是顯著的,東部地區(qū)正的溢出效應(yīng)超過了中部和西部地區(qū),中部地區(qū)則又高于西部地區(qū)。
[Abstract]:The equipment manufacturing industry is a strategic industry of the country. The existing empirical research does not explain whether FDI has a positive spillover effect on the equipment manufacturing industry. Based on the panel data of seven departments in the equipment manufacturing industry of 31 provinces and autonomous regions of China from 2001 to 2007, this paper estimates by the ordinary least square method and the fixed effect model that the proportion of FDI has significantly promoted the growth of China's equipment manufacturing industry. This positive spillover effect is realized directly and indirectly by influencing labor factors. There is no significant difference in the positive spillover effect of FDI in the seven departments, but the difference between regions is significant. The positive spillover effect in the eastern region is higher than that in the central and western regions, and the central region is higher than that in the western region.
【作者單位】： 上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)財(cái)經(jīng)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F832.6;F424

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 初保泰;有關(guān)建立中外合營(yíng)企業(yè)的幾個(gè)理論、政策問題[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;1983年05期

2 楊志和;關(guān)于外匯資金的利用問題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;1983年12期

3 魏玉明;;我國(guó)利用外資的現(xiàn)狀和今后工作的意見[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1983年07期

4 季崇威;武超;;關(guān)于中外合資經(jīng)營(yíng)企業(yè)的幾個(gè)認(rèn)識(shí)問題[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1983年07期

5 季;;我國(guó)利用外資有哪幾種方式?[J];國(guó)際展望;1983年S1期

6 ;要重視和發(fā)揮中國(guó)銀行的國(guó)際信貸杠桿作用[J];中國(guó)金融;1983年02期

7 季崇威 ,武超;進(jìn)一步辦好中外合資企業(yè)[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2254490