我國商業(yè)銀行供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-17 15:09
【摘要】：供應(yīng)鏈金融是對一個產(chǎn)業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈中的單個企業(yè)或上下游多個企業(yè)提供全面的金融服務(wù),以促進供應(yīng)鏈核心企業(yè)及上下游配套企業(yè)“產(chǎn)—供—銷”鏈條的穩(wěn)固和流轉(zhuǎn)暢順,并通過金融資本與實業(yè)經(jīng)濟協(xié)作,構(gòu)筑銀行、企業(yè)和商品供應(yīng)鏈互利共存、持續(xù)發(fā)展、良性互動的產(chǎn)業(yè)生態(tài)。這是一種全新的金融服務(wù)模式,這種模式將供應(yīng)鏈的管理理論及銀行的管理理論有效的組合到一起,把信息流、物流和資金流作為一個整體來監(jiān)控,不僅有效地解決了中小企業(yè)的融資問題,也為銀行產(chǎn)品開拓了新的銷售市場,提升了利潤空間,同時還帶動了物流業(yè)的發(fā)展。 雖然供應(yīng)鏈金融模式能夠在一定程度上降低銀行面臨的風(fēng)險,但是鏈條中仍隱含著一些風(fēng)險,國家風(fēng)險就是其中之一。國家風(fēng)險不同于企業(yè)自身問題所產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)營性風(fēng)險,它是受國家政治、政策、社會發(fā)展、自然災(zāi)害等不由企業(yè)控制的外在因素所決定的風(fēng)險,它是全球化的副產(chǎn)物。隨著企業(yè)取代傳統(tǒng)的民族國家成為全球化的主體,它成為將一國國家風(fēng)險向別國乃至全世界進行傳遞的鏈條,并成為國家風(fēng)險的最大的承擔(dān)者和受害者。中國一向是貿(mào)易大國,我國商業(yè)銀行在追隨客戶的要求下,其經(jīng)營和管理也將會面臨更多的國家風(fēng)險,而聯(lián)系銀行、企業(yè)的供應(yīng)金融服務(wù)模式也不可避免地會受到國家風(fēng)險的影響。 本文采用定量分析與定性分析相結(jié)合、理論解析與經(jīng)典案例相結(jié)合的研究方法,著重對供應(yīng)鏈金融國家風(fēng)險的三個方面的問題進行研究。 第一,如何識別國家風(fēng)險。目前,國內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于供應(yīng)鏈金融的風(fēng)險研究主要集中在信用風(fēng)險等封閉條件下的風(fēng)險,對于供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險幾乎無人研究。什么才是國家風(fēng)險?國家風(fēng)險是由什么構(gòu)成的?供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險的具體內(nèi)容是什么? 第二,如何評估國家風(fēng)險。國家風(fēng)險是隨時都存在的一種客觀現(xiàn)象,那么這種國家風(fēng)險到底有多大?我們應(yīng)該如何判斷國家風(fēng)險的大小?有哪些指標(biāo)可以作為判斷國家風(fēng)險的依據(jù)?哪種評估方法才是最合適的? 第三,如何控制國家風(fēng)險。識別風(fēng)險、評估風(fēng)險的最終目的就是控制風(fēng)險。那么我們應(yīng)如何去控制國家風(fēng)險?哪些措施是可行的?不同的國家風(fēng)險種類又應(yīng)該采取哪種相應(yīng)措施?措施的力度該用多大? 圍繞上述問題,本文共分為五章詳細(xì)論述。除了在第一章提出問題和在第五章給出基本結(jié)論之外,本文主要用了三章對供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險進行了具體的研究。 第二章對如何識別國家風(fēng)險進行了系統(tǒng)的論述。本文將供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險來源分為三大類：經(jīng)濟金融風(fēng)險、社會政治風(fēng)險和自然風(fēng)險,并針對這三類風(fēng)險進行了詳細(xì)的研究。 第三章對如何評估和控制國家風(fēng)險進行了系統(tǒng)的論述。對于國家風(fēng)險評估方法的研究,本文從定性和定量兩個角度進行,并結(jié)合國際知名評估機構(gòu)的評估結(jié)果來驗證國家風(fēng)險評估結(jié)果的準(zhǔn)確性,這就有效的克服了以往評估結(jié)果的主觀性及不科學(xué)性。對于國家風(fēng)險控制的研究,本文則從貸前檢查和貸后監(jiān)管兩個角度出發(fā),依據(jù)貸前和貸后的不同需求,采取不同的風(fēng)險防范措施。 第四章本文選取了一個典型的案例來剖析供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險。通過案例研究,我們可以了解商業(yè)銀行在實際的供應(yīng)鏈管理中是如何識別、評估和控制國家風(fēng)險的。 在對供應(yīng)鏈金融國家風(fēng)險的識別、評估和管理研究之后,本文得出了如下幾個結(jié)論： 第一,供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險是客觀存在的。通過對國家風(fēng)險的識別和評估,本文發(fā)現(xiàn)國家風(fēng)險涉及經(jīng)濟、政治、文化、宗教、自然環(huán)境等等各方面,諸如自然災(zāi)害風(fēng)險等是人力不可抗拒的風(fēng)險,如同地震、海嘯一樣,國家風(fēng)險也是客觀存在的,但是我們是可以利用工具預(yù)測和評估國家風(fēng)險的大小及可控程度的。 第二,供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險是可以合理規(guī)避和降低的。通過貸前審核和貸后監(jiān)督兩個環(huán)節(jié),銀行是可以合理防范國家風(fēng)險的,主要的風(fēng)險防范手段有：風(fēng)險規(guī)避、風(fēng)險分散、過程控制、風(fēng)險轉(zhuǎn)移、風(fēng)險補償、損失控制等。 目前國內(nèi)研究供應(yīng)鏈金融的文獻已經(jīng)相對較多了,但是與前人的研究相比,本文在三個方面有一定的新意： 第一,新的研究視角。本文研究發(fā)現(xiàn),前人對供應(yīng)鏈金融的研究主要是在封閉的經(jīng)濟條件下進行的,即只考慮國內(nèi)的情形,而不考慮國外因素影響。在全球化背景的沖擊和影響下,在我國WTO保護期結(jié)束的情形下,我國企業(yè)生存發(fā)展所面臨的制約因素已不僅僅局限于國內(nèi)因素,對于國際因素的關(guān)注也是必不可少的。本文創(chuàng)新性的從商業(yè)銀行的角度出發(fā),來觀察和研究國內(nèi)和國際兩個視角可能給我國供應(yīng)鏈金融發(fā)展帶來的風(fēng)險點。 第二,新的研究方法。前人在研究供應(yīng)鏈金融風(fēng)險的時候,一般都是采用定性的方法去分析,使用定量分析法或者將二者結(jié)合使用的學(xué)者較少。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于,對于應(yīng)鏈金融國家風(fēng)險的研究,是以風(fēng)險識別、評估、管理的基本流程為思路,采用定量分析與定性分析相結(jié)合、理論分析與案例分析相結(jié)合的方式來研究,這樣便克服了以往學(xué)者研究方法中存在的主觀性及片面性的問題。 第三,新的風(fēng)險內(nèi)容。在封閉條件下,供應(yīng)鏈金融模式存在著信用風(fēng)險、操作風(fēng)險、法律風(fēng)險等等風(fēng)險,我國學(xué)者基本上都是研究的供應(yīng)鏈金融封閉條件下的風(fēng)險。本文從開放的視角去研究供應(yīng)鏈金融的風(fēng)險點,提出了供應(yīng)鏈金融的國家風(fēng)險。 當(dāng)然,由于供應(yīng)鏈金融涉及的內(nèi)容較多,且其在我國建立的時間尚短,理論還不是很成熟,再加上本人學(xué)識有限,本文對于供應(yīng)鏈金融國家風(fēng)險的研究依然存在一些不足,進一步研究和拓展的空間還很大。一是本文對于供應(yīng)鏈金融國家風(fēng)險的研究主要是從一個比較系統(tǒng)的方面去闡述的,沒有采用某種具體的方法去驗證本文的結(jié)果。實際上,還可以選擇某種具體的研究工具如VAR模型等來詳細(xì)的研究一下國家風(fēng)險的大小及如何才能更好的控制國家風(fēng)險。二是供應(yīng)鏈金融的信用風(fēng)險可以利用信用利差期權(quán)工具來防范,價格風(fēng)險可以利用期貨等金融衍生工具來防范,本文認(rèn)為保險和再保險是防范國家風(fēng)險的有效工具,但是這種工具如何才能更好的幫助銀行規(guī)避或者降低風(fēng)險,這就需要進一步的研究。三是供應(yīng)鏈金融都是以核心企業(yè)作為支撐的。但核心企業(yè)畢竟是有限的,不是所有中小企業(yè)都能夠受到核心企業(yè)的庇護,如何建立一個沒有核心企業(yè)支撐的供應(yīng)鏈融資模式,是需要進一步研究的。
[Abstract]:Supply chain finance is to provide a comprehensive financial service to a single enterprise in an industrial supply chain or to a number of upstream and downstream enterprises in order to promote the stability and smooth flow of the chain of "production-supply-marketing" among the core enterprises in the supply chain and the supporting enterprises in the upstream and downstream of the supply chain. This is a brand-new financial service model, which combines supply chain management theory with bank management theory effectively and monitors information flow, logistics and capital flow as a whole. It not only effectively solves the financing problems of SMEs, but also for them. Banking products have opened up new sales markets, increased profit margins, and promoted the development of logistics industry.
Although the supply chain financial model can reduce the risks faced by banks to a certain extent, there are still some risks in the chain, and the national risk is one of them. As enterprises take the place of traditional nation-states and become the main body of globalization, they become the chain that transmits national risks to other countries and even the whole world, and become the biggest bearer and victim of national risks. Following the requirements of customers, their operation and management will also face more national risks, and the supply of financial services to banks and enterprises will inevitably be affected by national risks.
This paper combines quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, theoretical analysis with classical case study, focusing on three aspects of supply chain financial national risk.
Firstly, how to identify the national risk. At present, the domestic and foreign scholars mainly focus on the risk of supply chain finance under closed conditions such as credit risk, and almost no one studies the national risk of supply chain finance. What is the national risk? What constitutes the national risk of supply chain finance? Specific national risk of supply chain finance. What is the content?
Second, how to evaluate the national risk. National risk is an objective phenomenon that exists at any time. How much is the national risk? How should we judge the size of the national risk? What indicators can be used to judge the national risk? Which evaluation method is the most appropriate?
Thirdly, how to control national risks. The ultimate purpose of identifying risks and assessing risks is to control risks. Then how should we control national risks? What measures are feasible? What measures should be taken according to different types of national risks? How much should the measures be used?
In addition to the questions raised in the first chapter and the basic conclusions drawn in the fifth chapter, this paper mainly uses three chapters to study the national risk of supply chain finance.
In the second chapter, how to identify the national risk is discussed systematically. This paper divides the national risk sources of supply chain finance into three categories: economic and financial risks, social and political risks and natural risks.
Chapter 3 systematically discusses how to evaluate and control national risk. For the study of national risk assessment methods, this paper carries out qualitative and quantitative analysis, and verifies the accuracy of national risk assessment results by combining with the assessment results of well-known international assessment institutions, which effectively overcomes the subjectivity of previous assessment results. For the study of national risk control, this paper proceeds from the two angles of pre-loan inspection and post-loan supervision, and takes different risk prevention measures according to the different needs of pre-loan and post-loan.
Chapter 4 chooses a typical case to analyze the national risk of supply chain finance. Through the case study, we can understand how commercial banks identify, evaluate and control the national risk in the actual supply chain management.
After discerning, evaluating and managing the national risk of supply chain finance, this paper draws the following conclusions:
Firstly, the national risk of supply chain finance exists objectively. Through identifying and evaluating the national risk, this paper finds that the national risk involves economic, political, cultural, religious, natural environment and other aspects, such as natural disaster risk is an irresistible human risk, just like earthquake, tsunami, national risk is also an objective existence. But we can use tools to predict and assess the size and controllability of country risks.
Second, the national risk of supply chain finance can be reasonably avoided and reduced. Through pre-loan audit and post-loan supervision, banks can reasonably guard against national risk. The main risk prevention means are risk aversion, risk dispersion, process control, risk transfer, risk compensation, loss control and so on.
At present, there are many literatures on Supply Chain Finance in China, but compared with previous studies, this paper has some new ideas in three aspects.
This paper finds that the predecessors'researches on supply chain finance are mainly carried out under closed economic conditions, that is, they only consider the domestic situation without considering the influence of foreign factors. Restricting factors are not only limited to domestic factors, but also essential to international factors. This paper innovatively observes and studies the risk points that domestic and international perspectives may bring to the development of supply chain finance in China from the perspective of commercial banks.
Second, new research methods. Previous studies on supply chain financial risks, generally using qualitative methods to analyze, using quantitative analysis or the combination of the two scholars less. The way of thinking is to combine quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and combine theoretical analysis with case analysis, so as to overcome the subjectivity and one-sidedness existing in the previous research methods of scholars.
Thirdly, the new risk content. Under the closed condition, the supply chain financial model has the risk of credit risk, operation risk, legal risk and so on. Our scholars are basically studying the risk under the closed condition of supply chain finance. Risk.
Of course, because supply chain finance involves a lot of content, and its establishment time in China is still short, the theory is not mature, coupled with my limited knowledge, this paper still has some shortcomings in the study of supply chain finance country risk, and there is still a lot of room for further research and development. In fact, we can choose some specific research tools such as VAR model to study the size of national risk and how to better control national risk. Second, supply chain finance. Credit risk can be prevented by credit spread options, and price risk can be prevented by financial derivatives such as futures. This paper argues that insurance and reinsurance are effective tools to prevent national risks, but how to better help banks avoid or reduce risks, this requires further study. The supply chain finance is supported by the core enterprises. But the core enterprises are limited after all. Not all SMEs can be sheltered by the core enterprises. How to establish a supply chain financing model without the support of the core enterprises needs further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F832.33
本文編號：2246297
[Abstract]:Supply chain finance is to provide a comprehensive financial service to a single enterprise in an industrial supply chain or to a number of upstream and downstream enterprises in order to promote the stability and smooth flow of the chain of "production-supply-marketing" among the core enterprises in the supply chain and the supporting enterprises in the upstream and downstream of the supply chain. This is a brand-new financial service model, which combines supply chain management theory with bank management theory effectively and monitors information flow, logistics and capital flow as a whole. It not only effectively solves the financing problems of SMEs, but also for them. Banking products have opened up new sales markets, increased profit margins, and promoted the development of logistics industry.
Although the supply chain financial model can reduce the risks faced by banks to a certain extent, there are still some risks in the chain, and the national risk is one of them. As enterprises take the place of traditional nation-states and become the main body of globalization, they become the chain that transmits national risks to other countries and even the whole world, and become the biggest bearer and victim of national risks. Following the requirements of customers, their operation and management will also face more national risks, and the supply of financial services to banks and enterprises will inevitably be affected by national risks.
This paper combines quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, theoretical analysis with classical case study, focusing on three aspects of supply chain financial national risk.
Firstly, how to identify the national risk. At present, the domestic and foreign scholars mainly focus on the risk of supply chain finance under closed conditions such as credit risk, and almost no one studies the national risk of supply chain finance. What is the national risk? What constitutes the national risk of supply chain finance? Specific national risk of supply chain finance. What is the content?
Second, how to evaluate the national risk. National risk is an objective phenomenon that exists at any time. How much is the national risk? How should we judge the size of the national risk? What indicators can be used to judge the national risk? Which evaluation method is the most appropriate?
Thirdly, how to control national risks. The ultimate purpose of identifying risks and assessing risks is to control risks. Then how should we control national risks? What measures are feasible? What measures should be taken according to different types of national risks? How much should the measures be used?
In addition to the questions raised in the first chapter and the basic conclusions drawn in the fifth chapter, this paper mainly uses three chapters to study the national risk of supply chain finance.
In the second chapter, how to identify the national risk is discussed systematically. This paper divides the national risk sources of supply chain finance into three categories: economic and financial risks, social and political risks and natural risks.
Chapter 3 systematically discusses how to evaluate and control national risk. For the study of national risk assessment methods, this paper carries out qualitative and quantitative analysis, and verifies the accuracy of national risk assessment results by combining with the assessment results of well-known international assessment institutions, which effectively overcomes the subjectivity of previous assessment results. For the study of national risk control, this paper proceeds from the two angles of pre-loan inspection and post-loan supervision, and takes different risk prevention measures according to the different needs of pre-loan and post-loan.
Chapter 4 chooses a typical case to analyze the national risk of supply chain finance. Through the case study, we can understand how commercial banks identify, evaluate and control the national risk in the actual supply chain management.
After discerning, evaluating and managing the national risk of supply chain finance, this paper draws the following conclusions:
Firstly, the national risk of supply chain finance exists objectively. Through identifying and evaluating the national risk, this paper finds that the national risk involves economic, political, cultural, religious, natural environment and other aspects, such as natural disaster risk is an irresistible human risk, just like earthquake, tsunami, national risk is also an objective existence. But we can use tools to predict and assess the size and controllability of country risks.
Second, the national risk of supply chain finance can be reasonably avoided and reduced. Through pre-loan audit and post-loan supervision, banks can reasonably guard against national risk. The main risk prevention means are risk aversion, risk dispersion, process control, risk transfer, risk compensation, loss control and so on.
At present, there are many literatures on Supply Chain Finance in China, but compared with previous studies, this paper has some new ideas in three aspects.
This paper finds that the predecessors'researches on supply chain finance are mainly carried out under closed economic conditions, that is, they only consider the domestic situation without considering the influence of foreign factors. Restricting factors are not only limited to domestic factors, but also essential to international factors. This paper innovatively observes and studies the risk points that domestic and international perspectives may bring to the development of supply chain finance in China from the perspective of commercial banks.
Second, new research methods. Previous studies on supply chain financial risks, generally using qualitative methods to analyze, using quantitative analysis or the combination of the two scholars less. The way of thinking is to combine quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and combine theoretical analysis with case analysis, so as to overcome the subjectivity and one-sidedness existing in the previous research methods of scholars.
Thirdly, the new risk content. Under the closed condition, the supply chain financial model has the risk of credit risk, operation risk, legal risk and so on. Our scholars are basically studying the risk under the closed condition of supply chain finance. Risk.
Of course, because supply chain finance involves a lot of content, and its establishment time in China is still short, the theory is not mature, coupled with my limited knowledge, this paper still has some shortcomings in the study of supply chain finance country risk, and there is still a lot of room for further research and development. In fact, we can choose some specific research tools such as VAR model to study the size of national risk and how to better control national risk. Second, supply chain finance. Credit risk can be prevented by credit spread options, and price risk can be prevented by financial derivatives such as futures. This paper argues that insurance and reinsurance are effective tools to prevent national risks, but how to better help banks avoid or reduce risks, this requires further study. The supply chain finance is supported by the core enterprises. But the core enterprises are limited after all. Not all SMEs can be sheltered by the core enterprises. How to establish a supply chain financing model without the support of the core enterprises needs further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F832.33
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 樊新民;王千紅;;試析金融供應(yīng)鏈中融資企業(yè)違約風(fēng)險的成因[J];財會月刊;2010年27期
2 楊晏忠;;論商業(yè)銀行供應(yīng)鏈金融的風(fēng)險防范[J];金融論壇;2007年10期
3 馮靜生;;供應(yīng)鏈金融:優(yōu)勢、風(fēng)險及建議[J];區(qū)域金融研究;2009年02期
4 潘永明;趙云;;物流金融信用風(fēng)險評估模型構(gòu)建研究[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期
5 彎紅地;;供應(yīng)鏈金融的風(fēng)險模型分析研究[J];經(jīng)濟問題;2008年11期
6 陳杏生;;我國商業(yè)銀行跨國經(jīng)營中的國家風(fēng)險[J];經(jīng)濟視角;2006年07期
7 郭清馬;;供應(yīng)鏈金融模式及其風(fēng)險管理研究[J];金融教學(xué)與研究;2010年02期
8 趙晶晶;;物流金融理論下商業(yè)銀行信用風(fēng)險管理研究[J];金融縱橫;2007年03期
9 熊熊;馬佳;趙文杰;王小琰;張今;;供應(yīng)鏈金融模式下的信用風(fēng)險評價[J];南開管理評論;2009年04期
10 黃靜;趙慶禎;;基于樸素貝葉斯的供應(yīng)鏈金融信用風(fēng)險預(yù)測分析[J];物流科技;2009年08期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 閆俊宏;供應(yīng)鏈金融融資模式及其信用風(fēng)險管理研究[D];西北工業(yè)大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號：2246297
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2246297.html
最近更新
教材專著
