發(fā)布時間：2018-07-20 21:30

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟全球化的時代，金融全球化對國家間收入不平等的關(guān)系成為了許多研究的重點。自從20世紀(jì)80年代以來，各國開始逐步開放資本賬戶。這引發(fā)跨國的金融活動迅速發(fā)展，促進了金融全球化的發(fā)展。這是全球經(jīng)濟發(fā)展最核心的部分，也是經(jīng)濟活動中波動性和風(fēng)險性最大的一個中心環(huán)節(jié)。金融全球化使資本通過金融中介和市場在全球范圍內(nèi)流動，提高了資本使用效率，重新配置金融資源。一方面使需要融資的發(fā)展中國家得到必須的資本，促進本國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展；另一方面，全球金融市場的發(fā)展形成以發(fā)達國家為中心的分配系統(tǒng)。這為發(fā)達國家分散經(jīng)濟發(fā)展風(fēng)險提供渠道，同時在財富分配中獲得更多的利益。前者是對縮小全球收入不平等有正向作用，，后者是負作用。從金融全球化角度研究國際金融市場統(tǒng)一后對全球收入不平等的影響顯然具有重要的理論價值和現(xiàn)實意義。 全文分為六部分。 第一部分分析了金融全球化的現(xiàn)狀和研究意義進行。接著對經(jīng)濟全球化、金融一體化和金融全球化的基本進行區(qū)分。進一步來劃分金融全球化的概念和界限。 第二部分詳細講述了金融全球化與國家間收入不平等的研究進展。全球化帶來的國家間收入不平等的有關(guān)理論和研究進行了總結(jié)，并進行了分析和評價。這為后面的簡單理論推導(dǎo)提供了思路和基礎(chǔ)。同時也提出了整個研究的框架和思路。 第三部分對金融全球化與國家間收入不平等進行了描述性分析。金融全球化主要的特征是金融市場的證券化。隨著離岸市場的迅速發(fā)展，國際金融市場表現(xiàn)為證券化，而傳統(tǒng)的貸款有下降的趨勢但仍是最重要的金融融資渠道。金融全球化增加了國際資本流動的速度，同時也加大了世界經(jīng)濟的波動性，帶來了經(jīng)濟發(fā)展風(fēng)險。促使國際金融業(yè)從分工到混業(yè)競爭的趨勢發(fā)展。同時，國際機構(gòu)投資者迅速興起也是金融全球化的微觀表現(xiàn)形式。通過國際金融資源的重新配置，改變了以前固有的全球經(jīng)濟財富分配形式。 第四部分對金融全球化與國家間收入不平等的機制進行研究。利用簡單的數(shù)理推導(dǎo)得出2個推論：1.發(fā)達國家人口占全世界之比和全球收入不平等之間的關(guān)系呈倒U型；2.金融全球化和全球收入不平等的關(guān)系也是倒U型的。然后對金融全球化對全球收入不平等進行直接和間接渠道分析。 第五部分針對上面的推論和研究目的，建立4個模型。前2個驗證上章的推論，第三個模型檢驗全球金融資產(chǎn)和負債、發(fā)達國家人口占比和發(fā)達國家與其他國家收入差距對全球收入不平等的長期回歸關(guān)系。第四個模型是為了分析3個自變量對全球收入不平等的短期沖擊。 第六部分是研究的最終結(jié)論和進一步研究的方向。
[Abstract]:In the era of economic globalization, the relationship between financial globalization and income inequality between countries has become the focus of many studies. Since the 1980 s, countries have gradually opened their capital accounts. This triggered the rapid development of transnational financial activities, and promoted the development of financial globalization. This is the core part of global economic development and the most volatile and risky part of economic activity. Financial globalization makes capital flow in the global scope through financial intermediary and market, improves the efficiency of capital use and redistributes financial resources. On the one hand, developing countries in need of financing can get the necessary capital to promote their own economic development; on the other hand, the development of global financial markets forms a distribution system centered on developed countries. This provides a channel for developed countries to diversify economic development risks and gain more benefits from wealth distribution. The former has a positive effect on reducing global income inequality, while the latter has a negative effect. It is of great theoretical value and practical significance to study the impact of the unification of international financial market on global income inequality from the angle of financial globalization. The full text is divided into six parts. The first part analyzes the current situation and significance of financial globalization. Then the basic distinction between economic globalization, financial integration and financial globalization is made. To further divide the concept and boundaries of financial globalization. The second part describes the research progress of financial globalization and income inequality between countries in detail. The theories and studies on income inequality between countries brought by globalization are summarized, analyzed and evaluated. This provides the train of thought and foundation for the following simple theoretical derivation. At the same time, the framework and train of thought of the whole research are also put forward. The third part is a descriptive analysis of financial globalization and income inequality between countries. The main characteristic of financial globalization is securitization of financial market. With the rapid development of the offshore market, the international financial market is characterized by securitization, while the traditional loan is still the most important financial financing channel. Financial globalization not only increases the speed of international capital flow, but also increases the volatility of world economy and brings risks to economic development. To promote the international financial industry from the division of labor to the development of mixed competition. At the same time, the rapid rise of international institutional investors is also the micro-manifestation of financial globalization. The redistribution of international financial resources has changed the old pattern of distribution of wealth in the global economy. The fourth part studies the mechanism of financial globalization and income inequality between countries. By simple mathematical derivation, two corollaries: 1. The relationship between the population of developed countries as a proportion of the world and global income inequality is inverted U-shaped. The relationship between financial globalization and global income inequality is also inverted U-shaped. Then it analyzes the direct and indirect channels of financial globalization on global income inequality. In the fifth part, four models are established for the above inferences and research purposes. The first two tests the corollary of the previous chapter, the third model examines the global financial assets and liabilities, the proportion of the population in developed countries and the long-term regression relationship between the income gap between developed and other countries and global income inequality. The fourth model is to analyze the short-term impact of three independent variables on global income inequality. The sixth part is the final conclusion of the study and the direction of further research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F224;F831;F113

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 鄭長德;;中國金融發(fā)展與城鎮(zhèn)居民收入差距關(guān)系的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2006年06期

2 周云波;;城市化、城鄉(xiāng)差距以及全國居民總體收入差距的變動——收入差距倒U形假說的實證檢驗[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2009年04期

3 劉國光;中國經(jīng)濟增長形勢分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2000年06期

4 萬廣華;張茵;;收入增長與不平等對我國貧困的影響[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2006年06期

5 張幼文;全球化經(jīng)濟的要素分布與收入分配[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2002年10期

6 鄭長德;;全球化與區(qū)域間收入的不平等——基于中國省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];蘭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

7 萬廣華;張藕香;Mahvash Saeed Qureshi;;全球化與國家間的收入差距：來自81個國家面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟文匯;2008年02期

8 張幼文;人均GDP國際比較的方法與分析——對上海人均5000-8000美元階段的研究[J];社會科學(xué);2003年08期

本文編號：2134843