本文選題：金磚國家 + FDI�。� 參考：《浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：金磚五國均為經(jīng)濟(jì)快速增長的新興國家,五國國土面積占世界領(lǐng)土面積近30%,人口占世界總?cè)丝诘?2%。2010年五國國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值約占世界總量的18%,貿(mào)易額占世界的15%。五國在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)中發(fā)揮著日益重要的作用,同時(shí)也將成為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的風(fēng)向標(biāo)。在拉動(dòng)全球經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇的過程中,五國起到了不可忽視的作用。目前國內(nèi)外諸多學(xué)者研究表明,外商直接投資對(duì)東道國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展影響密切,在改善產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、投資環(huán)境等多方面都發(fā)揮了重要作用。五國均是國際資本的熱門選擇,同時(shí)五國今后的發(fā)展也離不開國際資本的支持,所以對(duì)“金磚國家”利用外商直接投資宏觀績(jī)效的研究進(jìn)行比較分析就具有非常重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文主要從五國利用外商直接投資的規(guī)模、潛力、績(jī)效實(shí)證、政策等方面進(jìn)行比較研究,研究發(fā)現(xiàn),五國中,俄羅斯引資優(yōu)勢(shì)最為突出,主要表現(xiàn)：引資增速快、潛力大、環(huán)境好；中國的引資比較穩(wěn)定,規(guī)模大,波動(dòng)小,較為集中；印度引資增速較快,但是波動(dòng)較大,雖然競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力較弱,但是質(zhì)量較好,未來上升空間很大；巴西引資規(guī)模最大、法律最健全,但是增速較低,同時(shí)波動(dòng)較劇烈；南非引資規(guī)模最小,且波動(dòng)性強(qiáng),增速一般,但是投資環(huán)境以及政策逐步健全�？傮w來說,五國在投資環(huán)境、政策、法律法規(guī)等方面,與發(fā)達(dá)國家差距明顯,在教育、高新技術(shù)、公共設(shè)施等方面仍需進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)努力。五國中,中國、印度和俄羅斯的國情相對(duì)比較接近,而巴西和南非具有后發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)。因此,為了使中國在未來新一輪競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中取長補(bǔ)短,全面提高吸引外商直接投資的能力和質(zhì)量,本文利用績(jī)效指數(shù)、潛力指數(shù)等方面進(jìn)行分析比較,以及利用實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)研究,從政策法規(guī)、引資行業(yè)分布、地區(qū)分布等方面著手對(duì)比五國,希望中國能夠進(jìn)一步提高外商直接投資的利用效率和質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:The BRICS are all emerging countries with rapid economic growth. The five countries account for nearly 30 percent of the world territory, with a population of 42 percent of the world population. In 2010, the five countries accounted for about 18 percent of the world's gross domestic product and 15 percent of the world's trade volume. The five countries are playing an increasingly important role in the world economy, and will also become the vane of the world economy. In the process of pulling the global economic recovery, the five countries have played an important role. At present, many scholars at home and abroad show that FDI has a close impact on the economic development of the host country and plays an important role in improving the industrial structure and investment environment. All five countries are hot choices of international capital, and the future development of the five countries cannot be separated from the support of international capital. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to compare and analyze the macro performance of foreign direct investment (FDI) in BRICS countries. This paper makes a comparative study on the scale, potential, performance and policy of FDI in the five countries. It is found that among the five countries, Russia has the most outstanding advantages of attracting foreign investment. The environment is good; China's foreign investment is relatively stable, its scale is large, its fluctuation is small, and it is more concentrated; India's investment growth rate is faster, but it is more volatile, although its competitiveness is weak, but the quality is better, and the future will be very large. Brazil has the largest scale of foreign investment. The law is the most sound, but the growth rate is low and the volatility is sharp; South Africa has the smallest scale, volatility and average growth rate, but the investment environment and policy are gradually sound. In general, the five countries have a clear gap with developed countries in terms of investment environment, policies, laws and regulations, and need to further strengthen their efforts in education, high and new technology, public facilities, and so on. Among the five countries, China, India and Russia are relatively close, while Brazil and South Africa have the advantage of latecomer. Therefore, in order to make China learn from each other in the new round of competition in the future and improve the ability and quality of attracting foreign direct investment in an all-round way, this paper makes use of performance index, potential index and other aspects to analyze and compare, as well as to make use of empirical data to study. By comparing the five countries in terms of policies and regulations, industry distribution and regional distribution, it is hoped that China can further improve the utilization efficiency and quality of foreign direct investment (FDI).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F831.6;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 黃娜;路楊;黃國平;;外商直接投資與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于東亞八國的實(shí)證研究[J];全國商情.經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究;2006年11期

2 奚君羊,劉衛(wèi)江;外商直接投資的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)實(shí)證分析[J];上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

3 李潔;;中國、巴西、印度三國利用外資政策和績(jī)效比較[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2005年06期

4 張宗斌;于洪波;;中日兩國對(duì)外直接投資比較研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2006年03期

5 吳ng超;FDI與中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的協(xié)整分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2004年08期

6 姚宏善,楊海叢;外商直接投資與中國外匯儲(chǔ)備的均衡關(guān)系分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2005年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 湖南省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃辦公室課題組　執(zhí)筆人 歐陽\，

本文編號(hào)：2110774