本文選題：地方政府融資平臺(tái) + 負(fù)債��； 參考：《財(cái)政研究》2013年10期

【摘要】：在銀行貸款渠道受控后,我國(guó)地方政府融資平臺(tái)通過(guò)銀行表外項(xiàng)目繼續(xù)負(fù)債融資,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)一步集聚。因此,應(yīng)分離地方政府與融資平臺(tái)的負(fù)債融資行為,建立地方政府資本型預(yù)算,硬化約束地方政府在提供公益類(lèi)資本型公共產(chǎn)品的負(fù)債汲取行為;引入私人社會(huì)資本,推進(jìn)融資平臺(tái)股份制改造,營(yíng)造融資特許權(quán)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制,建立收益類(lèi)資本型公共產(chǎn)品融資的市場(chǎng)約束機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:After the bank loan channel is controlled, the local government financing platform continues to finance through the bank off-balance sheet project, and the risk is further agglomerated. Therefore, the debt financing behavior of local government and financing platform should be separated, the local government capital budget should be established, and the debt absorption behavior of local government in providing public goods of commonweal capital type should be hardened, and private social capital should be introduced. To promote the shareholding system reform of financing platform, to create a competitive mechanism for financing concessions, and to establish a market restraint mechanism for capital-type public goods financing.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“地方政府融資平臺(tái)負(fù)債汲取行為及其規(guī)制研究”(12cjy107)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F812.5;F832.4
，

本文編號(hào)：2035004