本文選題：信息主權(quán) + 信用評級��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：長期以來,美國穆迪、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普爾和惠譽等國際評級機構(gòu)因其不透明、不公正的評級方式所帶來的嚴(yán)重后果受到了國際社會的廣泛質(zhì)疑。從安然事件,到“兩房”債券,從希臘、葡萄牙主權(quán)信用評級的下調(diào)到歐洲債務(wù)危機的爆發(fā),讓我們深刻了解了國際信用評級機構(gòu)的巨大作用。 三大國際信用評級機構(gòu)利用其壟斷的市場地位,一直居于信息發(fā)布的制高點,擁有資金配置的話語權(quán),被稱為資本市場的“看門人”。同時,國際信用評級機構(gòu)利用其壟斷地位和市場先機,不斷的通過收購、兼并等手段進入我國的信用評級市場,并通過信用評級機構(gòu)、市場和信息三方面滲控我國信用評級行業(yè),對我國信息主權(quán)和金融安全構(gòu)成了嚴(yán)重的威脅。 本文是從信息主權(quán)的角度出發(fā),以信用評級行業(yè)的具體的行業(yè)相關(guān)統(tǒng)計資料為樣本數(shù)據(jù),分析外資信用評級機構(gòu)是如何逐漸滲入中國的信用評級行業(yè)從而實現(xiàn)市場主導(dǎo)地位的過程；以及其利用市場主導(dǎo)地位所獲得的中國各個行業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)信息的程度,來研究中國信用評級行業(yè)的失控情況,從而提出相應(yīng)的應(yīng)對意見,為我國構(gòu)建新型信用評級體系以及后來研究提供一些事實依據(jù)。 首先介紹信用與信用評級的基本概念,信用評級行業(yè)的重要性與歷史發(fā)展?fàn)顩r以及信用評級對信息主權(quán)的影響機制。 然后從中國信用評級的機構(gòu)失控、市場失控、信息失控三個角度,通過資料數(shù)據(jù)的搜集分析國外信用評級機構(gòu)進入中國的進程凸顯信用評級機構(gòu)的失控；通過分析國外評級機構(gòu)直接參與國內(nèi)的金融行業(yè)市場比例,能源、采礦等核心行業(yè)的覆蓋范圍以及間接評級的方式參與我國國內(nèi)資本評級市場的業(yè)務(wù)情況凸顯市場失控；再通過分析信用評級的業(yè)務(wù)流程,分析評級機構(gòu)的各個環(huán)節(jié)所能收集到的數(shù)據(jù)資料相關(guān)情況凸顯信息的失控。 最終根據(jù)分析結(jié)果與信用評級行業(yè)國內(nèi)外發(fā)展經(jīng)驗,提出發(fā)展我國現(xiàn)有信用評級行業(yè)的建議。
[Abstract]:International rating agencies such as Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch have long been widely questioned by the international community for the serious consequences of their opaque and unfair ratings. From the Enron affair to the Fannie and Freddie bonds, from the downgrade of Greece and Portugal's sovereign credit rating to the outbreak of the European debt crisis, we have a profound understanding of the enormous role of international credit rating agencies. The three international credit rating agencies have been in the commanding height of information release by their monopolistic market status, and have the right to say the allocation of funds, so they are called "gatekeepers" of the capital market. At the same time, international credit rating agencies take advantage of their monopoly position and market opportunities to continuously enter the credit rating market of our country by means of acquisitions and mergers, and through credit rating agencies. The market and information control the credit rating industry in China, which poses a serious threat to our country's information sovereignty and financial security. From the perspective of information sovereignty, this paper takes specific industry statistics of credit rating industry as sample data. This paper analyzes the process of how foreign credit rating agencies gradually infiltrate the credit rating industry in China to realize market dominance, and the extent to which the foreign credit rating agencies make use of the market dominance to obtain the data and information of various industries in China. To study the runaway situation of China's credit rating industry, and put forward the corresponding suggestions, for China to build a new credit rating system and later research to provide some factual basis. This paper first introduces the basic concepts of credit and credit rating, the importance and historical development of credit rating industry and the influence mechanism of credit rating on information sovereignty. Then from the perspective of runaway credit rating agencies, out of control market, information out of control, through the collection of data analysis of foreign credit rating agencies into China's process highlights the runaway credit rating agencies; By analyzing the proportion of foreign rating agencies directly involved in the domestic financial market, the coverage of core industries such as energy, mining and indirect ratings, the business situation of participating in the domestic capital rating market of our country highlights that the market is out of control. Then through the analysis of the credit rating business process, the analysis of the rating agencies in each link can be collected data related to the situation highlights the information out of control. Finally, according to the analysis results and the domestic and foreign development experience of credit rating industry, the paper puts forward some suggestions to develop the existing credit rating industry in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：F832.39

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 孔笑微;全球化進程中的信息主權(quán)[J];國際論壇;2000年05期

2 鄭蘭祥;跨國商業(yè)銀行的國家風(fēng)險測評[J];經(jīng)濟理論與經(jīng)濟管理;2005年02期

3 曹榮湘;國家風(fēng)險與主權(quán)評級:全球資本市場的評估與準(zhǔn)入[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2003年05期

4 劉永剛;;中國對評級巨頭說“不”[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2010年28期

5 粟慧,俞芙蓉;從信息主權(quán)的高度認(rèn)識信息產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展[J];情報雜志;2001年05期

6 吳風(fēng)云;趙靜梅;;論美國證券信用評級霸權(quán)[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2005年12期

7 江涌;;中國資本市場:誰來看門[J];世界知識;2009年05期

8 肖瑞婷;;國外信用評級機構(gòu)認(rèn)可制度的經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];西部金融;2008年02期

9 周寶義 ,李政丹;主權(quán)信用評級與發(fā)展中國家國際融資[J];中國金融;2002年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張萌;企業(yè)信用評估體系與評估方法研究[D];西北大學(xué);2006年

2 楊凱;國家信息主權(quán)問題的研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2006年

3 趙，

本文編號：2034241