本文選題：國際投資爭議 + 沖突裁決　； 參考：《經(jīng)濟問題探索》2010年12期

【摘要】：國際投資爭議解決中的沖突裁決由平行程序和多重程序而引發(fā)。由于國際投資仲裁庭的管轄權(quán)經(jīng)常在內(nèi)涵和外延上與其他國際機構(gòu)重合而產(chǎn)生平行程序。而相同的裁斷者根據(jù)相同事件或法律措施、針對相似的案情、相同的BIT,卻可能因為認定標準的不一致而導致相互沖突的裁決結(jié)果。本文分析了沖突裁決大量存在對整個國際社會的負面效果,提出了防止沖突裁決的相應(yīng)對策,即借鑒國內(nèi)法中的一事不再理原則以及將相似案件合并處理。
[Abstract]:Conflict decisions in international investment dispute resolution are triggered by parallel and multiple procedures. Because the jurisdiction of the International Investment Arbitration Tribunal often overlaps with other international institutions in connotation and extension, parallel proceedings arise. The same adjudicators, according to the same events or legal measures, for similar cases, the same bit, may result in conflicting results because of the inconsistency of the determination criteria. This paper analyzes the negative effects of the large number of conflict adjudication on the whole international community, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures to prevent conflict adjudication, that is, to draw lessons from the principle of non bis in idem in domestic law and to combine similar cases with each other.
【作者單位】： 云南財經(jīng)大學法學院;
【分類號】：F831.6
，

本文編號：1880081