本文選題：美國(guó) + 對(duì)外直接投資　； 參考：《沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)與對(duì)外直接投資都是一國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中的必然現(xiàn)象，美國(guó)在這兩個(gè)方面都是走在前列的國(guó)家，，期間的一些規(guī)律帶有普遍性。我國(guó)未來也將面臨如何提升產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的難題，如何促進(jìn)這一過程是擺在我們面前的課題之一。美國(guó)除了是當(dāng)前世界經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力最雄厚的大國(guó)之外，也是目前全球最大的資本輸出強(qiáng)國(guó)。研究美國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的發(fā)展歷程，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：對(duì)外直接投資與其自身產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整和優(yōu)化存在著內(nèi)在的關(guān)聯(lián)。從對(duì)外投資地區(qū)和產(chǎn)業(yè)分布的過程來看，美國(guó)都是以促進(jìn)本國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)的。因此，美國(guó)的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)于指導(dǎo)我國(guó)通過對(duì)外直接投資來加快產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)，轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式具有重要的意義。 本文在研究美國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的特點(diǎn)以及產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整狀況的基礎(chǔ)上，構(gòu)建產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)指標(biāo)，并運(yùn)用VAR模型對(duì)美國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資與其國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了研究，實(shí)證結(jié)果表明：美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的不斷升級(jí)是對(duì)外直接投資長(zhǎng)期作用的結(jié)果，且兩者之間存在長(zhǎng)期穩(wěn)定的關(guān)系。通過比較中美兩國(guó)GDP，得出中國(guó)現(xiàn)階段經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平與美國(guó)20世紀(jì)90年初相接近。在此基礎(chǔ)上，建立灰關(guān)聯(lián)模型對(duì)1990年～2001年美國(guó)對(duì)外投資的六大部門與其國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的關(guān)聯(lián)度進(jìn)行分析，結(jié)果顯示六大部門均促進(jìn)了美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的不斷升級(jí)，但是影響程度不一。與其他部門相比，制造業(yè)、批發(fā)零售業(yè)和石油業(yè)對(duì)美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的促進(jìn)作用最大。最后借鑒美國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，有針對(duì)性地給出了中國(guó)通過對(duì)外直接投資來加快國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的指導(dǎo)性建議。
[Abstract]:Industrial upgrading and foreign direct investment are inevitable phenomena in the process of a country's social and economic development.In the future, our country will also face the problem of how to promote the industrial structure, and how to promote this process is one of the topics before us.The United States is not only the world's most powerful economic power, but also the world's largest capital export power.After studying the development of American FDI, we find that there is an inherent relationship between FDI and the adjustment and optimization of its industrial structure.From the perspective of the regional and industrial distribution of foreign investment, the United States takes the promotion of its own economic development and industrial upgrading as its starting point.Therefore, the successful experience of the United States is of great significance to guide our country to speed up industrial upgrading and change the mode of economic growth through foreign direct investment.On the basis of studying the characteristics of American foreign direct investment (OFDI) and the adjustment of industrial structure, this paper constructs the index of industrial upgrading, and uses VAR model to study the relationship between American FDI and its domestic industrial upgrading.The empirical results show that the continuous upgrading of American industry is the result of the long-term effect of FDI, and there is a long-term and stable relationship between the two.By comparing the GDPs of China and the United States, it is concluded that the current economic development level of China is close to that of the United States at the beginning of the 20th century.On this basis, the grey correlation model is established to analyze the correlation degree between the six major sectors of American overseas investment and their domestic industrial upgrading from 1990 to 2001. The results show that the six major departments have promoted the continuous upgrading of the domestic industries in the United States.But the degree of influence varies.Compared with other sectors, wholesale, retail and oil industries have contributed most to industrial upgrading in the United States.Finally, referring to the experience of the United States, the paper puts forward some guiding suggestions for China to speed up the upgrading of domestic industries through foreign direct investment (OFDI).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：F837.12;F279.712

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 嚴(yán)兵;;FDI與中國(guó)出口競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力——基于地區(qū)差異視角的分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年08期

2 徐德云;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)形態(tài)決定、測(cè)度的一個(gè)理論解釋及驗(yàn)證[J];財(cái)政研究;2008年01期

3 孔貴寶;;技術(shù)尋求型FDI對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響與對(duì)策分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年01期

4 金明玉;王大超;;韓國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化研究[J];東北亞論壇;2009年03期

5 董Oz;楊清;曹宗平;;廣東省對(duì)外直接投資與服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2008年01期

6 汪琦;對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)投資國(guó)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整效應(yīng)及其傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2004年05期

7 馮春曉;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化的實(shí)證研究——以制造業(yè)為例[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2009年08期

8 臧新;崔巖;董蓉蓉;;日韓對(duì)外直接投資及其與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整關(guān)系的實(shí)證比較[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年09期

9 江小涓 ,杜玲;對(duì)外投資理論及其對(duì)中國(guó)的借鑒意義[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2002年73期

10 宋偉良;論中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2005年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 歐陽(yáng)\

本文編號(hào)：1751540