發(fā)布時間：2018-04-04 05:15

  本文選題：保薦人制度　切入點：證券發(fā)行　出處：《上海經(jīng)濟研究》2010年11期

【摘要】：我國保薦人制度推出前,券商在證券市場的發(fā)行上市環(huán)節(jié)中僅僅扮演"推薦"一角,往往導致承銷時與其它中介機構(gòu)及發(fā)行人合謀造假,騙取上市資格,斂聚不義之財。而現(xiàn)行的保薦人制以"正式規(guī)則"的形式規(guī)定,擔任保薦人的券商機構(gòu)不僅要將擬上市公司扶上馬,還得護送一程,即持續(xù)承擔一系列擔保和監(jiān)督職責,從而在一定程度上降低了道德風險的發(fā)生概率。從"推薦"到"保薦",作為證券發(fā)行制度改革和變遷的產(chǎn)物,保薦人制對于我國證券市場的長足發(fā)展來說無疑具有深遠意義。然而,實踐操作中仍然存在部分保薦人"薦而不保"以及保薦過程中的嚴重利益輸送,卻折射出該制度本身依然存在著缺陷和弊端,制約了其應有的效應發(fā)揮。因此如何進一步完善保薦制度的各項具體細則,強化保薦人的市場監(jiān)管,維持保薦人權(quán)利、義務與責任的對等平衡,都直接影響著我國公司發(fā)行上市效率乃至整個證券市場能否有效運行。
[Abstract]:Before the introduction of the sponsor system in our country, the securities firms only played the role of "recommendation" in the process of issuing and listing in the securities market, which often led to collusion with other intermediary organizations and issuers in the underwriting to obtain listing qualifications and collect ill-gotten profits.The current system of sponsors, in the form of "formal rules," stipulates that securities agencies that act as sponsors not only need to support the companies to be listed, but also have to escort them for a long time, that is, to continue to undertake a series of guarantee and supervisory duties.Thus, the probability of moral hazard is reduced to a certain extent.From "recommendation" to "recommendation", as the product of the reform and change of the securities issuance system, the sponsor system is undoubtedly of far-reaching significance to the rapid development of China's securities market.However, in practice, there are still some sponsors "recommended but not insured" and serious interest transmission in the process of sponsorship, which reflects that the system itself still has defects and drawbacks, which restricts its due effect.Therefore, how to further improve the specific details of the sponsorship system, strengthen the market supervision of sponsors, and maintain the balance of rights, obligations and responsibilities of sponsors,Both of them directly affect the efficiency of our company's issuing and listing and even whether the whole securities market can operate effectively.
【作者單位】： 上海社會科學院經(jīng)濟研究所;
【分類號】：F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伏軍;程向梅;;我國證券保薦制度的外部制約與完善[J];河北法學;2006年12期

2 駱祚炎;貝葉斯博弈、可信威脅與保薦人制度有效性——以江蘇瓊花事件為例[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2005年03期

3 周猛麟;劉偉巍;;保薦人制度下新股發(fā)行抑價率的變化及原因統(tǒng)計分析[J];金融經(jīng)濟;2008年12期

4 李金一;關(guān)于我國證券發(fā)行上市保薦制度缺陷的思考[J];金融會計;2005年07期

5 任生,吳曉東;淺析保薦人制度的價值[J];理論前沿;2003年01期

6 黃復興;中國證券市場進一步發(fā)展的制度研究[J];社會科學;2003年12期

7 田啟;保薦人制度“李代桃僵”?[J];商務周刊;2003年20期

8 林涌;保薦人制度對規(guī)范股票發(fā)行市場的作用[J];探索與爭鳴;2004年07期

9 王歡;繳潔;;論保薦機構(gòu)與保薦人的利益沖突[J];湘潮(下半月)(理論);2007年12期

10 陳崢嶸;;海外證券市場保薦人制度考察[J];資本市場;2004年06期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉榮茂,周良;證券發(fā)行上市保薦制度的透視[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2004年02期

2 劉道遠;王曉錦;;招股說明書要約性質(zhì)研究——兼論締約前陳述與保證法律化[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2007年05期

3 劉道遠;王曉錦;;招股說明書要約性質(zhì)研究——兼論締約前陳述與保證法律化[J];時代法學;2007年06期

4 程澇，

本文編號：1708521