本文選題：外國直接投資　切入點(diǎn)：東盟　出處：《天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國和東盟經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平類似,在資源稟賦、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)等方面也有相似之處,都需要利用外資發(fā)展本國經(jīng)濟(jì),因此中國與東盟間吸收FDI不可避免。近年來,隨著中國與東盟國家投資環(huán)境的改善,東盟國家與中國吸引FDI競(jìng)爭(zhēng)愈加激烈。同時(shí),中國與東盟國家社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化的交往歷史悠久,中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的建立給中國和東盟吸收FDI帶來良好機(jī)遇,二者之間在吸引FDI上有很大的合作空間。文章以中國和東盟國家為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)二者之間吸引FDI的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與合作關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析。 根據(jù)以上背景,文章采取定量與定性的分析方法。首先,文章介紹了選題背景、研究方法、文章創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)以及相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的綜述；然后論述了外國直接投資的相關(guān)概念和理論,著重論述了區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì)理論。其次,論文對(duì)中國和東盟國家引資結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行定量分析,選取1995-2010年間中國和東盟國家的數(shù)據(jù)介紹了吸引FDI的總體規(guī)模情況、主要來源國情況和主要行業(yè)情況。再次,根據(jù)中國和東盟的引資結(jié)構(gòu)結(jié)合引資區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì)從宏觀環(huán)境、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素角度進(jìn)行比較,并且選取了1995-2010年間中國和東盟國家6DP、人口數(shù)、對(duì)外開放度、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施數(shù)為變量,利用回歸模型對(duì)中國和東盟吸引FDI的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,得出以下結(jié)論：與東盟國家相比,中國宏觀環(huán)境更好,但是在政策制度上還需完善；在吸收市場(chǎng)尋求型FDI具有優(yōu)勢(shì),但吸收資源尋求型FDI上不具有優(yōu)勢(shì)。而后在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的背景下,文章對(duì)中國和東盟吸收FDI的合作方面進(jìn)行分析,包括吸收區(qū)外直接投資和互相直接投資角度。最后,論文提出政策建議,包括正確處理中國和東盟國家吸收FDI的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與合作關(guān)系,在良性競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的環(huán)境下加強(qiáng)中國和東盟國家吸引FDI的合作。其中合作建議包括：改善投資環(huán)境、增強(qiáng)綜合區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì),以吸引更多區(qū)外直接投資；尋找互補(bǔ)領(lǐng)域、完善投資細(xì)則、多層次全方位促進(jìn)中國和東盟國家互相直接投資。
[Abstract]:The level of economic development between China and ASEAN is similar, and there are also similarities in resource endowment, industrial structure and trade structure, all of which need to use foreign capital to develop their own economy. Therefore, it is inevitable to absorb FDI between China and ASEAN in recent years. With the improvement of the investment environment between China and ASEAN countries, the competition between ASEAN countries and China to attract FDI is becoming more and more fierce. At the same time, the social, economic and cultural exchanges between China and ASEAN countries have a long history. The establishment of China-ASEAN Free Trade area brings good opportunities for China and ASEAN to absorb FDI, and there is a great space for cooperation between them in attracting FDI. This paper analyzes the competition and cooperation between them to attract FDI. Based on the above background, the paper adopts quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. First, the paper introduces the background of the topic, research methods, innovation points and related literature review, and then discusses the related concepts and theories of FDI. Secondly, the paper makes quantitative analysis on the structure of attracting foreign investment from China and ASEAN countries, and introduces the overall scale of attracting FDI from 1995 to 2010 according to the data of China and ASEAN countries. Thirdly, according to the investment structure of China and ASEAN combined with the regional advantages of attracting investment, the macroeconomic and economic factors are compared from the point of view of macro environment and economic factors, and the population of China and ASEAN countries between 1995 and 2010 is selected. The degree of opening to the outside world, the number of infrastructure as variables, using regression model to compare the competitiveness of China and ASEAN to attract FDI, draw the following conclusions: compared with ASEAN countries, China's macro environment is better. However, the policy and system still need to be improved, and the FDI has advantages in absorbing the market, but not in the resource-seeking FDI. Then, under the background of the coordinated development of regional economy, This paper analyzes the cooperation between China and ASEAN in absorbing FDI, including direct investment outside the region and mutual direct investment. Finally, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions. Including correctly handling the competition and cooperative relationship between China and ASEAN countries in absorbing FDI, and strengthening the cooperation between China and ASEAN countries in attracting FDI in a healthy competitive environment. The cooperative suggestions include: improving the investment environment and enhancing the comprehensive geographical advantages. In order to attract more foreign direct investment, to find complementary areas, improve investment rules, multi-level and all-round promotion of direct investment between China and ASEAN countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙玉煥;王帥;;中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)投資效應(yīng)研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

2 李建偉;中國對(duì)東盟直接投資產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇問題研究[J];東南亞縱橫;2003年08期

3 李陽,高媛;中國西南與東盟國家投資市場(chǎng)環(huán)境比較分析[J];東南亞縱橫;2003年12期

4 魯啟舟,周鳳珠;從南南型區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的實(shí)踐看中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)建立的制約因素[J];東南亞;2003年04期

5 李皖南;;日本對(duì)東盟直接投資的變化及評(píng)價(jià)[J];東南亞研究;2005年06期

6 杜群陽,宋玉華;中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的FDI效應(yīng)[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2004年03期

7 周毓萍;桑杰爾·拉爾;;中國吸引外資對(duì)東南亞國家吸引外資影響的實(shí)證研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2005年12期

8 黃蔚;;美國對(duì)華直接投資發(fā)展的實(shí)證研究及趨勢(shì)分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2005年12期

9 胡松華;現(xiàn)代西方跨國公司理論的發(fā)展[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;1997年06期

10 曹宏苓;;自由貿(mào)易區(qū)拉動(dòng)發(fā)展中國家國際直接投資效應(yīng)的比較研究——以東盟國家與墨西哥為例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 郭賢江;新世紀(jì)中日關(guān)系“政冷經(jīng)熱”分析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

2 李艷絨;20世紀(jì)80年代以來美國對(duì)華直接投資研究[D];中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2011年

3 隋忠華;中國與東盟吸引外商直接投資的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

4 肖開文;中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的貿(mào)易與直接投資效應(yīng)問題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

5 曹國平;美國對(duì)華投資區(qū)位選擇研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

6 馮冕;中外自由貿(mào)易區(qū)發(fā)展研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1669027