發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-11 11:34

  本文選題：FDI區(qū)位分布　切入點(diǎn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)差異　出處：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,外商直接投資(FDI)在江蘇省的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中扮演了重要角色,至2011年己連續(xù)九年引進(jìn)外資居全國首位。但是FDI在江蘇省的分布并不均衡,較富裕的蘇南一直是外資引進(jìn)的重心,FDI的區(qū)位分布差異和經(jīng)濟(jì)差異間似乎存在某種聯(lián)系。于是,本文引出兩個(gè)問題：歷史上江蘇省FDI的區(qū)位分布變化的趨勢(shì)是怎樣的?這種區(qū)位分布對(duì)江蘇省區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的協(xié)衡發(fā)展有哪些影響? 外商直接投資是當(dāng)今全球經(jīng)濟(jì)中最受矚目的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象之一,也是多學(xué)科交叉研究的理論前沿問題之一。目前在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異研究領(lǐng)域,由于各種條件的限制,相當(dāng)一部分研究是基于我國的東、中、西部三大區(qū)域的宏觀數(shù)據(jù)來研究。這種劃分是否科學(xué),采用的數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)口徑是否過寬值得深思。因此,本文以江蘇省為研究對(duì)象,將數(shù)據(jù)劃分成三個(gè)層面來研究,希望能完善區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異研究的全景；并且,FDI在江蘇的規(guī)模增長(zhǎng)、地區(qū)性聚集和空間分布的一些變化具有某種典型性,可以反映全國性的FDI演化情況,而利用外資促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)平穩(wěn)均衡增長(zhǎng)是我們的最終目標(biāo),因此,研究江蘇的FDI區(qū)位分布對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)差異的影響及對(duì)策分析,能為其他地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟(jì)均衡發(fā)展提供借鑒。 本文以江蘇省為對(duì)象,對(duì)FDI的分布從時(shí)間和空間層面進(jìn)行分析,認(rèn)為江蘇省的FDI存在不均衡增長(zhǎng)的趨勢(shì)：雖然各區(qū)域FDI都在增長(zhǎng),但蘇南地區(qū)FDI無論是存量還是增量,都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于蘇中蘇北,但蘇南的比重卻每年都在下降；各市中FDl最多的是蘇州,保持絕對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì),雖然各市都在趕超,但目前來看,想在總量上趕超,近期是不太可能；各層次各地區(qū)FDI總體呈現(xiàn)趨勢(shì)相似的波浪式增長(zhǎng)；無論是蘇南、蘇中、蘇北三大區(qū)域間,還是三大區(qū)域內(nèi)部,都呈現(xiàn)絕對(duì)差異在擴(kuò)大,相對(duì)差異在縮小,即呈現(xiàn)收斂；人均和總量上的FDI的區(qū)位分布趨勢(shì)類似。同時(shí),分解經(jīng)濟(jì)差異為產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)和生計(jì)指標(biāo)。利用多種絕對(duì)和相對(duì)差異指標(biāo)對(duì)對(duì)江蘇省的經(jīng)濟(jì)差異進(jìn)行測(cè)算,認(rèn)為江蘇省的產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)絕對(duì)差異和相對(duì)差異都在不斷擴(kuò)大；而生計(jì)指標(biāo)的絕對(duì)差異在擴(kuò)大,相對(duì)差異在前期波動(dòng)擴(kuò)大,后期變化平緩；兩個(gè)指標(biāo)的基尼系數(shù)都相當(dāng)小,說明江蘇省的貧富差距不大。通過應(yīng)用“雙向純?cè)隽磕Ｐ汀被貧w檢驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),FDI能夠解釋產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)差異和生計(jì)指標(biāo)中的城鎮(zhèn)居民人均可支配收入的差異,而并不能夠解釋生計(jì)指標(biāo)中農(nóng)民純收入的差異。FDI對(duì)蘇中的產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)和蘇北的城鎮(zhèn)居民收入的影響要高于其他地區(qū)的同一指標(biāo)。從而可以預(yù)見,如果能提升蘇中蘇北的人均FDI引入,在將來就能縮小蘇中、蘇北跟蘇南的經(jīng)濟(jì)差距。文章的最后,通過對(duì)FDI造成經(jīng)濟(jì)差異的路徑,給出了較有針對(duì)性的政策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, foreign direct investment (FDI) has played an important role in the economic development of Jiangsu Province. By 2011, FDI has been the first in the country for nine consecutive years. However, the distribution of FDI in Jiangsu Province is uneven. There seems to be some connection between the regional distribution difference and the economic difference of the richer southern Jiangsu province, which has always been the focus of the introduction of foreign capital. Therefore, this paper leads to two questions: what is the trend of the change of the FDI location distribution in Jiangsu Province in history? What influence does this location distribution have on the development of regional economy in Jiangsu Province? Foreign direct investment (FDI) is one of the most attractive economic phenomena in the global economy, and also one of the frontier problems in interdisciplinary research. At present, in the field of regional economic differences, due to the constraints of various conditions, foreign direct investment (FDI) is one of the most important economic phenomena in the global economy. Quite a part of the research is based on the macro data of the three major regions of east, middle and west of our country. Whether this division is scientific or not and whether the statistical caliber used is too wide is worth pondering. Therefore, this paper takes Jiangsu Province as the research object. Divide the data into three levels to study, hope to improve the panorama of regional economic differences, and FDI in Jiangsu scale growth, regional clustering and some changes in spatial distribution has a certain typicality. It can reflect the evolution of national FDI, and it is our ultimate goal to use foreign capital to promote the steady and balanced growth of economy. Therefore, this paper studies the influence of FDI location distribution on the economic difference in Jiangsu and analyzes the countermeasures. It can provide reference for the balanced economic development of other regions. This paper analyzes the distribution of FDI in Jiangsu Province in terms of time and space. It is concluded that the FDI of Jiangsu Province is increasing unevenly: although FDI is increasing in all regions, FDI in southern Jiangsu is increasing in both stock and increment. All of them are far higher than the middle and northern Jiangsu, but the proportion of the south of Jiangsu is declining every year; Suzhou has the most FDl in each city, keeping the absolute advantage, although each city is catching up and surpassing, but at present, it is unlikely to catch up with the total amount in the near future; The FDI of all levels and regions showed a similar trend of wave-like growth, the absolute differences were enlarged and the relative differences were reduced, that is, convergence was observed in the three regions of southern Jiangsu, central Jiangsu, northern Jiangsu and the interior of the three regions. The regional distribution trend of FDI in per capita and total amount is similar. At the same time, the economic difference is decomposed into output index and livelihood index. The author thinks that the absolute difference and relative difference of output index in Jiangsu Province are expanding, while the absolute difference of livelihood index is expanding, the relative difference is increasing in the early stage and the change is gentle in the later period, and the Gini coefficient of the two indexes is very small. It shows that the gap between the rich and the poor in Jiangsu Province is not big. By applying the regression test of "Bidirectional Increment Model", it is found that FDI can explain the difference of output indicators and the difference of the per capita disposable income of urban residents in the indicators of livelihood. But it can not explain the difference of peasants' net income in the livelihood index. FDI has more influence on the output index in the middle of Jiangsu and the income of the urban residents in the north of Jiangsu than the same index in other regions. If the per capita FDI of the central and northern Jiangsu can be increased, the economic gap between the central and northern Jiangsu and the south of Jiangsu can be narrowed in the future. At the end of the article, through the path of the economic difference caused by the FDI, the paper gives more targeted policy recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F127;F832.48;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 簡(jiǎn)曉彬;沈正平;劉寧寧;;蘇北與蘇中、蘇南經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差異的演變及成因探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2007年02期

2 武劍;外國直接投資的區(qū)域分布及其經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年04期

3 薛力;全球化進(jìn)程的空間分異及其對(duì)策探討——以江蘇省為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2003年05期

4 江小涓,李蕊;FDI對(duì)中國工業(yè)增長(zhǎng)和技術(shù)進(jìn)步的貢獻(xiàn)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年07期

5 王劍,徐康寧;FDI的地區(qū)聚集及其空間演化——以江蘇為例的研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年12期

6 石一磊,路正南;江蘇省區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展對(duì)策[J];江蘇商論;2005年08期

7 江錦凡;外國直接投資在中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的作用機(jī)制[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

8 冼國明;嚴(yán)兵;;FDI對(duì)中國創(chuàng)新能力的溢出效應(yīng)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年10期

9 沈坤榮,耿強(qiáng);外國直接投資的外溢效應(yīng)分析[J];金融研究;2000年03期

10 王少平;封福育;;外商直接投資對(duì)中國貿(mào)易的效應(yīng)與區(qū)域差異:基于動(dòng)態(tài)面板數(shù)據(jù)模型的分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1597985