本文關(guān)鍵詞： 商業(yè)銀行 社會(huì)責(zé)任 核心競爭力 主成分分析　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的探討一直長久不衰。在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展趨勢下,企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任成為獲取競爭優(yōu)勢的重要戰(zhàn)略。而商業(yè)銀行作為金融機(jī)構(gòu)的重要部分,承擔(dān)著不可替代的作用,但是近年來商業(yè)銀行危機(jī)頻發(fā),出現(xiàn)了很多影響商業(yè)銀行自身信譽(yù)的惡性事件,同時(shí)銀行間的競爭也日益加劇,而我國商業(yè)銀行在國際上的地位還亟待提升,社會(huì)大眾越來越迫切需要商業(yè)銀行承擔(dān)其社會(huì)責(zé)任。但是履行責(zé)任本身會(huì)承擔(dān)成本,是否能長期提升自己的競爭能力,達(dá)到商業(yè)銀行與利益相關(guān)者互利共贏的局面成為商業(yè)銀行面臨的重要問題之一。因此研究商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任與核心競爭力之間的關(guān)系具有重要意義。通過梳理國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),不難發(fā)現(xiàn)理論界對(duì)于企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究主要集中于企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績效的相關(guān)性研究,研究結(jié)論多樣,并沒有得出一致的說法。理論界對(duì)于商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究,從社會(huì)責(zé)任與核心競爭力角度進(jìn)行探討的文獻(xiàn)相對(duì)較少,從指標(biāo)選取到方法運(yùn)用上面還不夠成熟。本文從商業(yè)銀行所面臨的背景出發(fā),從社會(huì)責(zé)任、核心競爭力以及二者之間的關(guān)系三個(gè)方面回顧相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),結(jié)合相關(guān)理論,在利益相關(guān)者視角下將商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任分為對(duì)政府、股東、客戶、員工、社區(qū)的責(zé)任。結(jié)合以往文獻(xiàn),構(gòu)建商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任與核心競爭力的指標(biāo)體系,并利用20家商業(yè)銀行2008年到2013年的數(shù)據(jù)為樣本,通過主成分分析法對(duì)商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任與核心競爭力的相關(guān)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析,得出綜合得分,在此基礎(chǔ)上分析兩者之間的關(guān)系。經(jīng)過多次回歸,結(jié)果顯示商業(yè)銀行承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任無論是當(dāng)期還是長期都與核心競爭力呈顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The discussion of corporate social responsibility in academic circles has been lasting for a long time. Under the development trend of economic globalization. Corporate social responsibility has become an important strategy to obtain competitive advantage. Commercial banks, as an important part of financial institutions, play an irreplaceable role, but in recent years, commercial bank crises occur frequently. There have been a lot of malignant events affecting the credibility of commercial banks, and the competition among banks is increasingly intensified. However, the status of commercial banks in China needs to be promoted urgently in the world. The public is more and more in need of commercial banks to assume their social responsibility, but the responsibility itself will bear the costs, whether it can improve their competitiveness for a long time. To achieve a win-win situation between commercial banks and stakeholders has become one of the important problems faced by commercial banks. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the relationship between social responsibility and core competitiveness of commercial banks. Internal and external literature. It is not difficult to find that the theoretical research on corporate social responsibility mainly focuses on the correlation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. There is no consistent view. There is relatively little literature on the social responsibility of commercial banks from the perspective of social responsibility and core competitiveness. From the selection of indicators to the use of methods above is not mature. From the commercial banks facing the background, from the social responsibility, core competitiveness and the relationship between the three aspects of the review of relevant literature. Combined with the relevant theory, the commercial bank social responsibility is divided into the government, shareholders, customers, employees, community responsibility under the perspective of stakeholders. Combined with previous literature. To construct the index system of social responsibility and core competence of commercial banks, and use the data of 20 commercial banks from 2008 to 2013 as samples. Through the principal component analysis of commercial bank social responsibility and core competitiveness of the relevant indicators to analyze the comprehensive score on the basis of the analysis of the relationship between the two. After multiple regression. The results show that commercial banks' social responsibility has a significant positive correlation with the core competence both in the current period and in the long run.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F270;F271;F832.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 朱明秀;;財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)績、CEO薪酬與商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任——基于我國上市商業(yè)銀行的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2011年02期

2 李桂艷;王洪銳;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績效關(guān)系研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2009年08期

3 晁罡;程鵬;張水英;;基于員工視角的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)工作投入影響的實(shí)證研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

4 楊蓉;楊宇;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與核心競爭力——基于中國上市公司的實(shí)證研究[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 邵君利;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任活動(dòng)對(duì)企業(yè)價(jià)值的影響——根據(jù)中國化學(xué)制品行業(yè)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年01期

6 葉宗裕;關(guān)于多指標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)中指標(biāo)正向化和無量綱化方法的選擇[J];浙江統(tǒng)計(jì);2003年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 呂明柱;中國商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績效關(guān)系研究[D];東北石油大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1465923