本文選題：大空間建筑 + 技術(shù)��； 參考：《清華大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：大空間建筑集中了當(dāng)下最為先進(jìn)、復(fù)雜和綜合的建筑技術(shù)，體現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中技術(shù)作為本質(zhì)存在的文化價(jià)值和意識(shí)形態(tài)。當(dāng)代大空間建筑應(yīng)該理解成富有意義的技術(shù)系統(tǒng)，在體育場(chǎng)館、文化會(huì)展、交通建筑和溫室廠房等領(lǐng)域形成具體的表現(xiàn)。論文試圖超越大空間建筑的功能主義分類，研究建筑技術(shù)在功能和表現(xiàn)上承載的整體意義。 古代的大空間建筑建立了技術(shù)與意義的整體性關(guān)系，哥特式教堂奠定了現(xiàn)代技術(shù)的方法論起源。自工業(yè)時(shí)代以來(lái)，全新的功能、材料和工程技術(shù)促進(jìn)了大空間的發(fā)展，塑造了技術(shù)的紀(jì)念性特征，但同時(shí)也造成建筑學(xué)和技術(shù)的分離。 隨著結(jié)構(gòu)和機(jī)電技術(shù)的進(jìn)步，當(dāng)代大空間實(shí)現(xiàn)了全新的功能特征。通用大空間代表使用上的靈活性和設(shè)計(jì)整合的機(jī)會(huì)，盡管其中的均質(zhì)性假設(shè)存在體驗(yàn)上的局限性。大空間建筑群經(jīng)由功能耦合改進(jìn)了城市結(jié)構(gòu)，建立宏偉的開(kāi)放空間。臨時(shí)場(chǎng)館的技術(shù)促成了城市場(chǎng)所和文化事件的結(jié)合。 當(dāng)代大空間建筑中技術(shù)所具有的表現(xiàn)潛力由結(jié)構(gòu)、材料、環(huán)境、照明影像和數(shù)字化建造等方法實(shí)現(xiàn)。結(jié)構(gòu)表現(xiàn)超越純粹的理性原則，涉及空間結(jié)構(gòu)仿生學(xué)、建構(gòu)幾何、開(kāi)合結(jié)構(gòu)等方法；材料表現(xiàn)為輕型化、透明性、生態(tài)化的技術(shù)過(guò)程，并且豐富和發(fā)展了帶有明確意義的節(jié)點(diǎn)和建造邏輯；低能耗和被動(dòng)式能源內(nèi)含大空間建筑的可持續(xù)策略；照明和影像使用當(dāng)代技術(shù)定義大空間中的強(qiáng)烈體驗(yàn)，和建筑結(jié)合而形成多元涵義；數(shù)字生產(chǎn)和建造技術(shù)促進(jìn)了從設(shè)計(jì)模型到生產(chǎn)交付的整體過(guò)程，形成更為復(fù)雜多樣的建筑形式和面向未來(lái)的建造方法。 在大空間建筑中，技術(shù)的使用過(guò)程和方法構(gòu)成意義。建筑的品質(zhì)來(lái)源于技術(shù)過(guò)程和方法的總和，在建筑與自然、社會(huì)之間建立關(guān)聯(lián)，即再現(xiàn)自然隱含的準(zhǔn)則，而不是模仿自然界具象的象征形式；表達(dá)傳統(tǒng)的深層結(jié)構(gòu)，，而不是復(fù)制和拷貝傳統(tǒng)符號(hào)。通過(guò)整合多元化的建筑感知和結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)成、環(huán)境體系，大空間建筑展現(xiàn)了通往技術(shù)自由的多種可能性。技術(shù)需要謹(jǐn)慎、準(zhǔn)確和最大程度地加以利用，以適度的方式在建筑中實(shí)現(xiàn)具體的真實(shí)性，準(zhǔn)確地反映今日世界的復(fù)雜狀況，在豐富多樣的當(dāng)代文化中獲得深刻的意義。
[Abstract]:Large space architecture focuses on the most advanced, complex and comprehensive architectural technology, which embodies the cultural value and ideology of technology as the essence of modern society. Modern large space architecture should be understood as a meaningful technical system, forming concrete performance in the fields of stadiums, cultural exhibitions, traffic buildings and greenhouse workshops. This paper attempts to transcend the functional classification of large-space architecture and study the overall significance of architectural technology in its function and performance. The ancient large-space architecture established the holistic relationship between technology and meaning, and the Gothic church laid the origin of methodology of modern technology. Since the industrial age, new functions, materials and engineering technology have promoted the development of large space and shaped the commemorative characteristics of technology, but also caused the separation of architecture and technology. With the development of structure and electromechanical technology, modern large-space has realized new functional features. Universal large spaces represent flexibility in use and opportunities for design integration, despite the experiential limitations of the homogeneity hypothesis. Large-space buildings improve the urban structure by functional coupling and establish grand open space. The technology of temporary stadiums has facilitated the integration of urban venues and cultural events. The expression potential of technology in modern large space architecture is realized by means of structure, material, environment, lighting image and digital construction. Structural performance goes beyond pure rational principles and involves methods such as space structure bionics, geometry construction, opening and closing structures, etc. And it enriches and develops the node and construction logic with clear meaning; the sustainable strategy of low-energy and passive energy with large space buildings; and the intense experience of lighting and imaging in defining large spaces using contemporary technology, Digital production and construction technology promote the whole process from design model to production delivery, and form more complex and diverse architectural forms and future-oriented construction methods. In large space architecture, the process and method of using technology constitute meaning. The quality of architecture comes from the summation of technological processes and methods, establishing a connection between architecture and nature and society, that is, to reproduce the hidden norms of nature, rather than to imitate the symbolic forms of nature, and to express the deep structure of tradition. Instead of copying and copying traditional symbols. By integrating diverse architectural perceptions and structural components, environmental systems, large space architecture reveals a variety of possibilities leading to technological freedom. Technology needs to be used carefully, accurately and to the maximum extent, to realize concrete authenticity in architecture in an appropriate way, to accurately reflect the complex situation of the world today, and to gain profound significance in rich and diverse contemporary culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：清華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU20

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 錢辰偉;;臺(tái)灣高雄太陽(yáng)能體育場(chǎng)[J];城市建筑;2010年11期

2 鐘睿;肖采薇;張玉龍;;關(guān)于珠三角地區(qū)劇場(chǎng)群調(diào)研的若干問(wèn)題分析——文化部科技提升計(jì)劃課題:中國(guó)劇場(chǎng)使用后評(píng)估(POE)體系研究報(bào)告之一[J];建筑技藝;2013年06期

3 何宛余;;荷蘭2028奧運(yùn)暢想[J];城市建筑;2009年11期

4 朱曉琳;Hubert Nienhoff;;功能與場(chǎng)所的契合——訪gmp事務(wù)所合伙人Hubert Nienhoff[J];建筑技藝;2011年Z2期

5 盧向東;肖采薇;羅敏杰;《中國(guó)劇場(chǎng)后評(píng)估(POE)體系研究》課題組;長(zhǎng)三角地區(qū)劇院A及劇院B某兩位技術(shù)主管人員;;長(zhǎng)三角地區(qū)兩個(gè)劇場(chǎng)訪談?dòng)涗浥c點(diǎn)評(píng)——文化部科技提升計(jì)劃課題:中國(guó)劇場(chǎng)使用后評(píng)估(POE)體系研究報(bào)告之二[J];建筑技藝;2013年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李興鋼;第一見(jiàn)證:“鳥(niǎo)巢”的誕生、理念、技術(shù)和時(shí)代決定性[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2072434