本文選題：供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)共享　出處：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著科技和信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展,資本經(jīng)濟(jì)不再是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的主流,知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的主導(dǎo)地位越來(lái)越凸顯,成為企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和可持續(xù)發(fā)展的重要資源,逐漸將此投入到管理理論和實(shí)踐當(dāng)中。隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,組織之間的相互關(guān)系越來(lái)越密切,單個(gè)企業(yè)間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)逐步被弱化,而供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)卻進(jìn)入到了白熱化狀態(tài),因此供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟的受重視程度逐步提高。知識(shí)逐漸成為供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟的戰(zhàn)略資源,將知識(shí)管理應(yīng)用到供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟上,可利用聯(lián)盟知識(shí)的優(yōu)勢(shì)互補(bǔ),增強(qiáng)企業(yè)的知識(shí)量和知識(shí)創(chuàng)新,提高企業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,更有效的應(yīng)對(duì)市場(chǎng)環(huán)境的快速變化。而供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享則是管理的核心內(nèi)容,但由于知識(shí)差異、聯(lián)盟特性以及聯(lián)盟合作效應(yīng)等多方因素的制約,使得供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享決策機(jī)制仍然存在較多弊端。因此深入探索供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享顯得十分重要。故本文從以下五方面,在博弈理論的基礎(chǔ)上,深入探索供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享決策:(1)本文從供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的研究背景和意義出發(fā),通過對(duì)相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述的概括總結(jié),明確本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容、研究方法及技術(shù)路線。(2)明確本文研究?jī)?nèi)容,給出相關(guān)理論概述,包括供應(yīng)鏈和供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟、知識(shí)和知識(shí)共享、供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享定義及特征、博弈理論概述、假設(shè)及研究方法、供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享中的博弈關(guān)系等。(3)本文明確構(gòu)建了影響供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的三個(gè)維度因素——共享意愿、能力及知識(shí)特性,并明確指出對(duì)稱型、非對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的特點(diǎn)及相適應(yīng)的博弈模型。(4)在上述供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享類型的基礎(chǔ)上,分別提出對(duì)稱型和非對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的理論假設(shè)和影響因素,最終構(gòu)建出對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的演化博弈模型以及非對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享博弈的斯塔克爾伯格博弈模型。(5)根據(jù)上述不同類型的博弈理論模型,得出對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享演化博弈均衡結(jié)果以及非對(duì)稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享斯坦克爾伯格博弈均衡結(jié)果,通過分析上述結(jié)果,明確不同類型的供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享決策的重要影響因素,然后給出相應(yīng)政策建議,最終對(duì)對(duì)稱和非對(duì)稱型進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology and information technology, the capital economy is no longer the mainstream of economic development, and the leading position of knowledge economy is becoming more and more prominent, which has become an important resource for enterprise competition and sustainable development. With the development of knowledge economy, the relationship between organizations is getting closer and closer, the competition among individual enterprises is gradually weakened, but the competition among supply chain alliances has entered into a state of hyperthermia. Knowledge has gradually become the strategic resource of supply chain alliance. Applying knowledge management to supply chain alliance can make use of the complementary advantages of alliance knowledge and enhance the amount of knowledge and knowledge innovation of enterprises. In order to improve the competitiveness of enterprises and cope with the rapid change of market environment more effectively, knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance is the core content of management, but because of the knowledge difference, alliance characteristic and alliance cooperation effect, etc. Therefore, it is very important to explore the knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance in depth. Therefore, this paper based on the game theory from the following five aspects, Based on the background and significance of knowledge sharing in supply chain alliance, this paper makes clear the research content of this paper by summarizing the related literature. The research method and technical route. 2) make clear the research content of this paper, and give a summary of relevant theories, including supply chain and supply chain alliance, knowledge and knowledge sharing, definition and characteristics of supply chain alliance knowledge sharing, and game theory. Hypothesis and research method, game relation in knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance, etc.) this paper clearly constructs three dimension factors that affect knowledge sharing in supply chain alliance-sharing willingness, ability and knowledge characteristics, and points out the symmetry type. On the basis of the above types of knowledge sharing in supply chain alliances, the theoretical assumptions and influencing factors of knowledge sharing in symmetric and asymmetric supply chain alliances are put forward respectively. Finally, the evolutionary game model of knowledge sharing in symmetric supply chain alliance and Stackelberg game model of knowledge sharing game in asymmetric supply chain alliance are constructed. The results of knowledge sharing evolutionary game equilibrium of symmetric supply chain alliance and Stankelberg game equilibrium result of asymmetric supply chain alliance knowledge sharing are obtained. The important influencing factors of different types of supply chain alliance knowledge sharing decision are defined, and the corresponding policy recommendations are given. Finally, the symmetry and asymmetry types are compared and summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F274;F224.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 程鈞謨;王琪琪;宋美玲;朱振中;;基于成本收益的供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享重復(fù)博弈分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2016年01期

2 王潔;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享的博弈分析[J];無(wú)錫商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

3 馮長(zhǎng)利;李天鵬;蘭鷹;;意愿對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈知識(shí)共享影響的實(shí)證研究[J];管理評(píng)論;2013年03期

4 李新;王敏晰;;供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識(shí)共享的博弈分析[J];中國(guó)流通經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年10期

5 馮長(zhǎng)利;周劍;蘭鷹;;供應(yīng)鏈成員間知識(shí)共享行為演化博弈模型[J];情報(bào)雜志;2012年03期

6 張旭梅;陳偉;張映秀;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享影響因素的實(shí)證研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2009年10期

7 呂大娥;朱�？�;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識(shí)共享的研究[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2008年30期

8 張堅(jiān);;企業(yè)技術(shù)聯(lián)盟中知識(shí)共享的影響因素分析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

9 任巖;;企業(yè)知識(shí)共享影響因素研究綜述[J];情報(bào)雜志;2006年10期

10 梁梁;王志強(qiáng);湯衛(wèi)君;熊立;;基于指派博弈的供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟整體設(shè)計(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)模型[J];中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1593615