本文選題：西山村滑坡 + 地震數(shù)值模擬��； 參考：《成都理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：地震動(dòng)力作用下的斜坡穩(wěn)定性研究對(duì)于我國(guó)地震高發(fā)的西南山區(qū)有著重要意義。本文以西山村滑坡為研究對(duì)象,在搜集整理研究區(qū)域相關(guān)地質(zhì)資料并對(duì)西山村滑坡形態(tài)、地質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)特征、宏觀變形特征等詳細(xì)調(diào)查與分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)西山村滑坡在地震動(dòng)力荷載作用下的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)及加卸載響應(yīng)規(guī)律進(jìn)行深入分析研究,主要研究?jī)?nèi)容有以下幾個(gè)方面:(1)分析了理縣西山村滑坡基本工程地質(zhì)條件。開展現(xiàn)場(chǎng)調(diào)查和室內(nèi)試驗(yàn)分析,研究堆積層滑坡的物質(zhì)組成、結(jié)構(gòu)特征以及強(qiáng)度、滲透特性,掌握滑坡的各項(xiàng)基本的巖土力學(xué)性能指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù),為后續(xù)數(shù)值模擬研究、參數(shù)取值等提供依據(jù)。(2)結(jié)合西山村滑坡的監(jiān)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)以及其宏觀變形特征,對(duì)滑坡進(jìn)行變形分區(qū),研究了各個(gè)變形區(qū)的變形特點(diǎn),分析了滑坡的形成及變形機(jī)理。(3)研究了西山村滑坡在地震作用下的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)特征。通過數(shù)值模擬的方法,研究西山村滑坡在地震動(dòng)力作用下的位移、變形速率的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)時(shí)程特征,分析其變形特征,并對(duì)計(jì)算模擬結(jié)果進(jìn)行討論,進(jìn)而分析了滑坡在地震作用下的變形破壞機(jī)理。(4)根據(jù)變形的數(shù)值模擬結(jié)果,采用加卸載響應(yīng)比理論,分析研究西山村滑坡在不同地震荷載下的位移、速度、加速度加卸載響應(yīng)規(guī)律。(5)采用加卸載響應(yīng)度判據(jù),對(duì)地震動(dòng)力作用下西山村滑坡的穩(wěn)定性進(jìn)行定量分析,并與常規(guī)的斜坡穩(wěn)定性分析方法進(jìn)行比對(duì),驗(yàn)證其正確性。通過以上研究得到了以下結(jié)論和成果:(1)西山村滑坡位于理縣通化鄉(xiāng)雜谷腦河左岸,地理坐標(biāo)為北緯30°54′43″,東經(jīng)102°32′46″�；抡w上呈前窄后寬的長(zhǎng)條帶狀,滑坡前緣以雜谷腦河為界,高程約為1510m;滑坡左右兩側(cè)以沖溝為界;滑坡后緣以一近直立的滑坡壁為界,后緣高程約為3300m�；虑昂缶壐卟罴s1790m,滑坡體縱長(zhǎng)約為3800m,平均寬度約680m,最大寬度約為980m,滑坡堆積體厚度在10~80m之間,整體規(guī)模約1.7×108m3�；挛匆娒黠@滑帶層。(2)西山村滑坡變形區(qū)域主要分布在滑坡的左側(cè)前緣和左側(cè)中部,根據(jù)滑坡復(fù)活變形特征,其變形可以分為I、II、III三個(gè)區(qū)域,其中變形Ⅰ區(qū)變形最為劇烈,Ⅱ區(qū)次之,Ⅲ區(qū)較小。綜合宏觀變形及監(jiān)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),目前滑坡復(fù)活變形方式表現(xiàn)為牽引式滑坡,變形力學(xué)模式為蠕滑-拉裂型。(3)西山村滑坡對(duì)地震荷載的響應(yīng)總體上呈現(xiàn)出非線性的特點(diǎn),滑坡不同區(qū)域響應(yīng)差異明顯�；卤砻娴牡卣鹆憫�(yīng)呈現(xiàn)出前部較大,中后部逐漸減小的特征;滑坡深部地震力響應(yīng)呈現(xiàn)出中部較大,前后緣較小的特征。同時(shí),西山村滑坡表面地震力響應(yīng)要大于滑坡深部響應(yīng)。此外,滑坡在地震荷載下的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)在空間上還表現(xiàn)出各向異性的特點(diǎn),滑坡在水平方向上的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)大于豎直方向,說明滑坡在地震作用下主要向著臨空面的方向發(fā)生變形。(4)西山村滑坡的地震力響應(yīng)存在滯后性,具體表現(xiàn)在:滑坡表面上位置越高的監(jiān)測(cè)點(diǎn)動(dòng)力響應(yīng)就越滯后,監(jiān)測(cè)點(diǎn)埋深越淺動(dòng)力響應(yīng)越滯后。(5)不同類型地震波對(duì)斜坡的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)有很大的影響。在同一振動(dòng)強(qiáng)度下,地震波的振動(dòng)頻率越高,斜坡體上質(zhì)點(diǎn)的變形就約趨于線性;反之,質(zhì)點(diǎn)變形則會(huì)呈現(xiàn)出周期性波動(dòng)增大的趨勢(shì)。同樣隨著振動(dòng)頻率的提高,斜坡的動(dòng)力響應(yīng)會(huì)越來(lái)越積極,響應(yīng)的滯后時(shí)間越來(lái)越短。此外,隨著地震波的振幅的增大,震后斜坡的位移也會(huì)增大。(6)西山村滑坡在地震力作用下加卸載響應(yīng)比時(shí)序曲線表現(xiàn)出在1.0左右波動(dòng)震蕩的特征。當(dāng)響應(yīng)時(shí)序曲線的表現(xiàn)出非線性特征時(shí),對(duì)應(yīng)的加卸載響應(yīng)比曲線會(huì)出現(xiàn)一個(gè)峰值。同時(shí),采用同一加卸載參量的加卸載響應(yīng)比曲線會(huì)保持相似的波動(dòng)趨勢(shì),說明加卸載響應(yīng)比值的變化只和各參量的變化趨勢(shì)有關(guān)。(7)西山村滑坡在持續(xù)時(shí)長(zhǎng)為5s峰值加速度為0.15g的地震荷載作用下,其最小加卸載響應(yīng)度為1.19,說明震后滑坡仍處于穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。本研究對(duì)于預(yù)防西南山區(qū)滑坡地質(zhì)災(zāi)害和維護(hù)人民的生命財(cái)產(chǎn)安全,具有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義;同時(shí)也可以為西南山區(qū)類似滑坡的地震穩(wěn)定性評(píng)價(jià)提供參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The study of slope stability under seismic dynamic action is of great significance to the southwest mountainous area of China's earthquake. This paper takes the Xishan landslide as the research object, and based on the detailed investigation and analysis of the regional geological data and the detailed investigation and analysis of the landslides, geological structure features and macroscopic deformation characteristics of Xishan village. The dynamic response of the village landslide and the response law of loading and unloading under the earthquake dynamic load are deeply analyzed and studied. The main contents are as follows: (1) the basic engineering geological conditions of the landslide in Xishan village of Lixian County are analyzed. The material composition, structural characteristics and strength of the landslides are studied by field investigation and laboratory tests. Degrees, permeability characteristics, grasp the basic rock and soil mechanical properties of landslide data, for the follow-up numerical simulation research, parameter values and so on. (2) combining the monitoring data of the landslide in Xishan village and its macroscopic deformation characteristics, the deformation zone of the landslide is divided, the deformation characteristics of each deformation area are studied, and the formation and change of the landslide is analyzed. (3) the dynamic response characteristics of the landslide in Xishan village under the earthquake action are studied. Through numerical simulation, the displacement of the landslide in the Xishan village and the dynamic response time history of the deformation rate are studied, the deformation characteristics are analyzed, and the simulated results are discussed, and then the landslide is analyzed under the action of the earthquake. (4) according to the numerical simulation results of the deformation, the displacement, velocity, acceleration and unloading response laws of Xishan village landslides are analyzed by loading and unloading response ratio theory. (5) the stability of the landslide in Xishan village under the action of ground motion is quantitatively analyzed by the criterion of loading and unloading response degree, and the stability of the landslide under the action of ground motion is quantitatively analyzed. The following conclusions and results are obtained through the comparison of the conventional slope stability analysis method. The following conclusions and results are obtained: (1) the landslide is located on the left bank of the Zay valley river in the Tonghua township of the Lixian County, the geographical coordinates are 30 degrees 54 '43 "in the North latitude and 102 degrees 32' 46" in the East, and the landslide whole body is a long strip with a narrow front and a narrow width, and the front edge of the landslide is mixed. The height of the valley is about 1510m, and the elevation is about the boundary of the gully in the left and right sides of the landslide; the back edge of the landslide is bounded by a near vertical landslide wall, the elevation of the back edge is about 1790m, and the length of the landslide body is about 3800m, the average width is about 680m, the maximum width is about 980m, the thickness of the landslide accumulation is between 10~80m, and the overall scale is about 1.7 x 108m. 3. landslides do not have obvious sliding zone. (2) the deformation area of the landslide in Xishan village is mainly distributed in the left front edge and the left middle part of the landslide. According to the characteristics of the landslides' resurrection and deformation, the deformation can be divided into three regions, I, II and III, of which the deformation I area is the most severe, the second region is the second and the third is smaller. The form of the live deformation is tractive landslides, and the deformation mechanics model is creep and crack type. (3) the response of the landslide to the earthquake load is nonlinear in general, and the response difference is obvious in different landslides. The seismic response of the landslide surface appears to be larger in the front and gradually decreasing in the middle and rear parts, and the deep seismic force of the landslide. The response is larger in the middle and smaller in the front and rear edge. At the same time, the seismic response of the landslide on the Xishan village is greater than the deep response of the landslide. In addition, the dynamic response of the landslide is also anisotropic in space, and the dynamic response of the landslide in the horizontal direction is greater than the vertical direction, indicating that the landslide is in the earthquake. (4) the seismic response of the landslide in Xishan village is lagging behind. The dynamic response of the monitoring point on the surface of the landslide is lagging behind and the more shallow dynamic response of the monitoring point is lagging behind. (5) the different types of seismic waves have a great influence on the dynamic response of the slope. The higher the vibration frequency is, the higher the vibration frequency of the seismic waves, the deformation of the particles on the slope tends to be linear. On the contrary, the deformation of the particle will show a tendency to increase the periodic fluctuation. As the vibration frequency increases, the dynamic response of the slope will become more active and the lag time of the response becomes shorter and shorter. In addition, with the vibration wave vibration. As the amplitude increases, the displacement of the post earthquake slope will also increase. (6) the response ratio curve of the Xishan village landslide is characterized by fluctuating oscillation at about 1. When the response time sequence curve shows a nonlinear characteristic, the corresponding load and unload response ratio curve will have a peak. At the same time, the same loading and unloading parameter is used. The load and unload response ratio curve will keep the similar fluctuation trend, indicating that the change of the load and unload response ratio is only related to the variation trend of the parameters. (7) the minimum loading and unloading response degree of the Xishan landslide is 1.19 under the earthquake load of the peak acceleration of 5S, which indicates that the landslide is still in a stable state after the earthquake. The study is of great practical significance for the prevention of landslide geological hazards in the southwest mountain area and the maintenance of the safety of people's life and property. At the same time, it can also provide reference for the seismic stability evaluation of similar landslides in the southwest mountainous area.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：成都理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：P642.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹陽(yáng)健;湯明高;楊何;;庫(kù)水與降雨作用下白水河滑坡加卸載響應(yīng)比分析[J];人民長(zhǎng)江;2016年23期

2 楊何;湯明高;朱永國(guó);何健保;李龍起;;高烈度區(qū)水庫(kù)堆積層滑坡地震動(dòng)力響應(yīng)及穩(wěn)定性分析[J];水電能源科學(xué);2016年08期

3 景鵬旭;龔文俊;孟慶筱;趙樂;;地震邊坡非線性特征及敏感性分析[J];地震工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年S2期

4 韋正鵬;劉富強(qiáng);;基于地震動(dòng)力作用下的散粒體邊坡穩(wěn)定性分析[J];蘭州工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年06期

5 王來(lái)貴;習(xí)彥會(huì);劉向峰;趙國(guó)超;;地震載荷作用下巖質(zhì)邊坡應(yīng)力狀態(tài)調(diào)整與破壞規(guī)律分析[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年12期

6 賀可強(qiáng);楊德兵;郭璐;李晶;;堆積層滑坡水動(dòng)力位移耦合預(yù)測(cè)參數(shù)及其評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];巖土力學(xué);2015年S2期

7 鄧華鋒;胡亞運(yùn);李建林;肖志勇;周美玲;胡玉;;考慮滯后效應(yīng)的巖石加卸載響應(yīng)比試驗(yàn)研究[J];巖石力學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年S1期

8 杜飛;任光明;夏敏;高波;余天彬;吳龍科;;地震作用誘發(fā)老滑坡復(fù)活機(jī)制的數(shù)值模擬[J];山地學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

9 涂杰文;劉紅帥;湯愛平;鄭桐;;基于離心振動(dòng)臺(tái)的堆積型滑坡加速度響應(yīng)特征[J];巖石力學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年07期

10 陳為公;賀可強(qiáng);;加卸載響應(yīng)比理論在地質(zhì)災(zāi)害預(yù)測(cè)領(lǐng)域的研究進(jìn)展[J];力學(xué)與實(shí)踐;2015年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 唐春安;左宇軍;秦泗鳳;楊菊英;王大國(guó);李連崇;徐濤;;汶川地震中的邊坡淺層碎裂與拋射模式及其動(dòng)力學(xué)解釋[A];汶川大地震工程震害調(diào)查分析與研究[C];2009年

2 李海波;馬行東;邵蔚;夏祥;戴會(huì)超;肖克強(qiáng);;地震波參數(shù)對(duì)地下巖體洞室位移特性的影響分析[A];第九屆全國(guó)巖石動(dòng)力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐光興;地震作用下邊坡工程動(dòng)力響應(yīng)與永久位移分析[D];西南交通大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 馬旭;四川省理縣西山村滑坡協(xié)同預(yù)警研究[D];成都理工大學(xué);2016年

2 陳建君;復(fù)雜山區(qū)斜坡的地震動(dòng)力響應(yīng)分析[D];成都理工大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1885656