論文題目：Students are asked to write a critical analysis, based on the suggested reading, of the methodological approach adopted by the paper entitled: Kilduff,M.(1993).“Deconstructing Organizations
論文語言：英語論文 English
論文專業(yè)：Management
字數(shù)：2000
學校國家：英國
是否有數(shù)據(jù)處理要求：否
您的學校：Keele University.英國排名40
論文用于：BA essay 本科課程作業(yè)
補充要求和說明：
Students are asked to write a critical analysis, based on the suggested reading, of the methodological approach adopted by the paper entitled: Kilduff,M.(1993).“Deconstructing Organizations", The Academy of Management Review,18/1:13-31
需要按照學校的reading list。課程

1.0 Introduction 介紹

組織研究，作為社會科學的一部分，涵蓋非常廣泛的領(lǐng)域，也受到了如此多的不同學者的關(guān)注。有這么多不同的研究方法，如解構(gòu)主義，實證主義、形而上學和隱喻、解釋學等也有一些基礎(chǔ)性的貢獻的文本，就像月和西蒙的組織，賈可德里達的這篇短文寫作學等分析方法采用了“解構(gòu)”組織。那是在上世紀90年代初期由馬丁吉爾達夫?qū)懙摹?993，本文已被打印出來，，在管理科學評論。為了分析這一文本的方法論，主要有五個部分在這些短文章。第一部分是關(guān)于馬丁吉爾達夫文本的研究過程；第二部分綜述了用于馬丁吉爾達夫主要研究文獻；三部分是關(guān)于馬丁吉爾達夫文本的主要方法；四部分關(guān)注的核心話題：解構(gòu)主義、五部分是對全文的一個簡短的總結(jié)。在這篇短文中的推理過程，案例研究法和對比分析將作為主要的推理方法和解構(gòu)的方法也是本篇的重點課題，但它不是第一個主題介紹。Organizational studies, as part of social science, cover very wide fields and have also been concerned by so many different scholars. There are so many different researching methods, such as deconstruction, positivist, metaphysical and metaphorical, hermeneutic etc. There are also some foundational contribution texts, just like March and Simon’s Organizations, Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology etc.  This short essay focuses on analyzing the methodological approach adopted by the paper of “Deconstructing Organizations”. It was written by Martin Kilduff at the initial stage of 1990s. In 1993, this text has been printed out in The Academy of Management Review. For analyzing the methodological approach of this text, there are five main parts in these short essays. Part one is about the researching process of Martin Kilduff’s text; Part two reviews the main literatures used in the paper of Martin Kilduff; Part three is about the main methodologies of Martin Kilduff’s text; Part four concerns about the core topic: deconstructive approach and part five is a short summary of the whole paper. In the reasoning process of this short essay, case approach and comparative analysis will be used as two main reasoning methods and deconstructive approach is also the focusing topic of this short essay, but it is not the first topic in this paper. 

2.0 Research process of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 解構(gòu)組織的研究過程

The same as the topic, core content of Martin Kilduff’s text is “deconstructing organizations”, which occupies over 60% text’s length. Before the core part, Martin Kilduff introduced deconstruction briefly and following the core part, Martin Kilduff summarized the limits of the text. In the process of illustrating deconstructing organizations, Martin Kilduff madethe analysis from following aspects: the structure of presence and absence, programming the body and programming the mind, the organization as writing machine, the ideology of programming, the unanticipated consequences of programmed organizations and a confessional tale. All of these composing and writing is for, just utilizing Martin Kilduff’s original words --- “my motive for this deconstruction is not only to exposes textual limitation, but also to permanently change the way the text is used in management education and research.”

For achieving this objective, at the beginning of the text, Martin Kilduff did not specially emphasizes or illustrated deconstruction or deconstructing organizations, but strongly commend March and Simon’s Organizations from this text’s contribution in the area of organizational studies. After praising about March and Simon’s text, Martin Kilduff put forward the key object out of this paper as “a dissenting perspective”. Martin Kilduff used this “dissenting perspective” to “reevaluate the appearance of progress in organizational theory”. And then in the following part, Martin Kilduff interpreted “deconstruction” in detail with the supporting of so many different scholars’ studies. In the process of illustrating “deconstruction”, Martin Kilduff first defined the position of Jacques Derrida in organizational studies, just like “the most influential post-structuralist philosopher” and “extravagantly convoluted” (Agger, 1991). For Martin Kilduff’s understanding about Jacques Derrida’s text, deconstruction is one writing way. In the article of Jacques Derrida, deconstruction is used to question the relation and presentation way of different concepts in one text; it is one way to open the conflicting relationships in the internal part of the text for the readers. Then deconstructions organizations are illustrated from so many aspects by Martin Kilduff. As the concentrated content, this part will be analyzed in the methodologies of this paper. In the limits part, Martin Kilduff gave out two limiting factors: “exclusion and distortion of previous texts”; difficult to relate textual analysis with institutions. In the conclusion part, Martin Kilduff summarized that March and Simon’s text is an eternal classic in traditional organization studies; in understanding standard textual, deconstruction just might be “particularly useful”. 

3.0 Literature Review of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 
4.0 Main Methodology of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 
5.0 Deconstructive Approach 

6.0 Conclusion 總結(jié)

In one sentence, the reasoning methods of Martin Kilduff in text---deconstructing organizations are very strict and the reasoning process is very well-conceived. It is worth learning and studying for me in the future researching process.  Martin Kilduff reviews so many literatures and the conclusion is sufficiently to get. Even like this, there are still some shortcomings, such as Martin Kilduff concerns too much on two papers and the researching methods are also not objective enough or interested into readers. But generally speaking, author of this paper believes the researching and studying of Martin Kilduff is success and convincing. 

7.0 References文獻

Martin Kilduff. (1993). Deconstructing Organizations. The Academy of Management Review. Vol.18, No.1, P13-P31
March J. G. & Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley
Agger B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol.17, P105-P131
 Sullivan Patricia. (2004). Jacques Derrida Dies; Deconstructionist Philosopher. Washington Post, October 10, 2004
Pidgen Charles R. (1990). On a defence of derrida. The Critical review. Issues30–32, P40–P41
Rihoux Benoît. (2006). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology. Vol.21, No.5
Savin-Baden M. & Major C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge
Fischer C.T. (2005). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. Academic Press.

本文編號：44005