【摘要】：中共中央辦公廳于2012年4月16日發(fā)布了《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理工作條例》，并于2012年7月1日起正式施行�！饵h政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理工作條例》的執(zhí)行，宣告了中共中央辦公廳于1996年5月3日發(fā)布的《中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨機(jī)關(guān)公文處理?xiàng)l例》和國(guó)務(wù)院于2000年8月24日發(fā)布《國(guó)家行政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理辦法》正式退出歷史舞臺(tái)。作為新《條例》的配套，同年6月29日國(guó)家質(zhì)監(jiān)總局和國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化委員會(huì)發(fā)布了《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文格式》國(guó)家標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，于7月1日正式實(shí)施，1999年修訂實(shí)行的《國(guó)家行政機(jī)關(guān)公文格式》即行停止實(shí)施，，這宣告了我國(guó)黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理統(tǒng)一的新時(shí)代正式到來。 為較好的貫徹學(xué)習(xí)新文本，糾正文書工作者與新文本的規(guī)定不相適應(yīng)的地方，同時(shí)也為了進(jìn)一步領(lǐng)會(huì)新文本的進(jìn)步之處，并查找出新文本仍然不合理的因素，為下一步的繼續(xù)修訂提出可供參考的建議，筆者選取這五個(gè)文本，從公文處理的總原則以及公文擬制、公文辦理、公文管理的流程進(jìn)行了比較研究。 文章認(rèn)為，新文本的修訂有許多創(chuàng)新之處，如：更加注重公文處理的科學(xué)化，更好的把握了“黨政合一”和“黨政分開”的原則，對(duì)黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文進(jìn)行了界定，對(duì)文種數(shù)量進(jìn)行了精簡(jiǎn)，對(duì)文種功能進(jìn)行了拓展、限制和綜合，進(jìn)一步規(guī)范了文本語言的表述，對(duì)條例和格式的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了校好的區(qū)分，對(duì)行文規(guī)則和處理流程進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的梳理，進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)了對(duì)公文管理的規(guī)定和要求等等。 當(dāng)然，通過比較研究，筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)了新文本仍存在一些不足之處。如：個(gè)別文種的適用范圍不夠科學(xué)合理；未認(rèn)識(shí)到公文傳遞的重要性，對(duì)公文處理流程的科學(xué)劃分還有待進(jìn)一步明確和梳理；公文擬制環(huán)節(jié)中，對(duì)“審核”“審議”“初核”的概念規(guī)定較為模糊等等。 新文本的頒布和實(shí)施，對(duì)于黨政機(jī)關(guān)實(shí)際公文處理工作是一次挑戰(zhàn)和革新，要求公文處理工作者全面學(xué)習(xí)領(lǐng)會(huì)文本內(nèi)容和要求，并通過實(shí)踐進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)，進(jìn)一步提高公文處理工作的質(zhì)量和效率。
[Abstract]:The General Office of the CPC Central Committee issued the regulations on the handling of official documents of Party and Government organs on 16 April 2012, and the implementation of the regulations on the handling of official documents of Party and Government organs came into effect on 1 July 2012, The regulations on the handling of official documents of the organs of the Communist Party of China, issued by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee on May 3, 1996, and the measures for handling official documents of the State Administrative organs, issued by the State Council on August 24, 2000, were officially withdrawn from the historical stage. As a complement to the new regulations, on 29 June of the same year, the State Administration of quality Supervision and the State Standardization Commission issued the national standard "format of official documents of Party and Government organs", which was officially implemented on 1 July. The "official document format of State Administrative organs", which was revised and carried out in 1999, ceased to be implemented, which proclaimed the arrival of a new era of unified handling of official documents of the Party and Government organs in China. In order to better carry out the study of the new text, correct the incompatibility between the clerks and the provisions of the new text, and at the same time in order to further understand the progress of the new text and find out the factors that remain unreasonable in the new text, In order to make suggestions for further revision, the author selects these five texts and makes a comparative study on the general principles of document processing, the preparation of official documents, the management of official documents and the management of official documents. The article holds that there are many innovations in the revision of the new text, such as paying more attention to the scientific handling of official documents, better grasping the principles of "the unity of party and government" and "separating the party and government", and defining the official documents of the party and government organs. It simplifies the number of languages, expands, limits and synthesizes the functions of the language, further standardizes the expression of the text language, and makes a good distinction between the contents of the regulations and the format. The rules of writing and processing process are further combed, and the regulations and requirements of document management are further strengthened. Of course, through the comparative study, the author found that there are still some shortcomings in the new text. For example, the scope of application of individual languages is not scientific and reasonable, the importance of document transmission has not been recognized, the scientific division of the processing process of official documents needs to be further clarified and combed; In the process of document preparation, the definition of "audit", "review" and "preliminary audit" is vague and so on. The promulgation and implementation of the new text is a challenge and innovation for the actual processing of official documents of the party and government organs, requiring the official document processing workers to learn and understand the contents and requirements of the text in an all-round way, and to test it through practice. Further improve the quality and efficiency of document processing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D630;C931.46

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳詒偉;;當(dāng)前黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理中常見的問題及對(duì)策建議[J];辦公室業(yè)務(wù);2009年01期

2 趙國(guó)俊;關(guān)于進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理法規(guī)建設(shè)的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2000年03期

3 胡明波;;《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理工作條例》特點(diǎn)研究[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2012年05期

4 陳祖芬;;探究《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理?xiàng)l例》和《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文格式》的新變化[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2012年05期

5 徐軍;;新舊黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文比較研究[J];重慶工貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

6 鄭彥離;;黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文格式標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)改稱通用公文格式標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];檔案管理;2012年06期

7 彭海河;;論黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文寫作的思維特征[J];廣東培正學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

8 鄭彥離;;格式中印發(fā)機(jī)關(guān)和印發(fā)日期項(xiàng)目應(yīng)該取消[J];檔案管理;2013年01期

9 楊t瑋;黃愛華;;使用表格定位法精確設(shè)置公文格式[J];辦公自動(dòng)化;2013年06期

10 馮均毓;;淺析《黨政機(jī)關(guān)公文處理工作條例》的幾個(gè)特點(diǎn)[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2013年07期

本文編號(hào)：2449598