發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-06-16 10:00

　　在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的今天,中美貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端愈演愈烈。2018年,中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)打響,引起國(guó)內(nèi)外媒體的廣泛關(guān)注。中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)不僅是政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、法律等方面的問(wèn)題,而且是話語(yǔ)的過(guò)程,當(dāng)前國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者在理論、方法和研究問(wèn)題上很少關(guān)注貿(mào)易摩擦的具體過(guò)程,特別是媒體話語(yǔ)對(duì)于貿(mào)易糾紛產(chǎn)生、加劇、轉(zhuǎn)化和消解過(guò)程的關(guān)鍵作用。文章基于論辯話語(yǔ)研究方法以及文化話語(yǔ)分析法,構(gòu)建媒體話語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用論辯研究新路徑——文化話語(yǔ)分析框架下的語(yǔ)用論辯研究,并以中美媒體關(guān)于中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的相關(guān)報(bào)道為例初步論證了該研究路徑的可行性。本文通過(guò)分析《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》和《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》就中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的媒體話語(yǔ),探討如下兩個(gè)相互關(guān)聯(lián)的研究問(wèn)題:（1）《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》和《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》在貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)中分別是如何布局各自的話語(yǔ)行為的?（2）中美兩方媒體在貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)中各自使用了哪些具體的話語(yǔ)策略?本文借助文化話語(yǔ)研究方法,從話語(yǔ)主體、話語(yǔ)主題、話語(yǔ)歷史文化關(guān)系等方面對(duì)中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)媒體話語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行了宏觀分析與對(duì)比;然后通過(guò)語(yǔ)用論辯話語(yǔ)研究的策略操控分析方法分析對(duì)比了《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》與《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》對(duì)中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)報(bào)道中的論辯結(jié)構(gòu),還有內(nèi)嵌其中的各種核心話語(yǔ)策略,試圖從微觀上深入剖析中美雙方媒體在貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)... 

【文章來(lái)源】：湘潭大學(xué)湖南省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：118 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviation
Introduction
    Research Background
    Research Objectives and Questions
    Structure of the Thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Sino-US Trade War
        1.1.1 Studies on the Plutonomy of Sino-US Trade War
        1.1.2 Studies on the Law of Sino-US Trade War
        1.1.3 Studies on the News Communication of Sino-US Trade War
        1.1.4 Studies on the Linguistics Sino-US Trade War
    1.2 Media and Discourse
    1.3 Pragma-Dialectics
        1.3.1 Studies Abroad on Pragma-Dialectics
        1.3.2 Domestic Studies on Pragma-Dialectics
    1.4 Comments on Previous Studies
Chapter Two Theoretical Framework
    2.1 Cultural Approach to Discourse
    2.2 The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation
        2.2.1 Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation
        2.2.2 Strategic Maneuvering Analysis Method
Chapter Three Research Methodology
    3.1 Data Collection
    3.2 Data Processing
        3.2.1 Classification of Discourse Speakers
        3.2.2 Extraction of Discourse Themes
Chapter Four Macro Contrast and Analysis of News Discourse inSino-US Trade War
    4.1 Historical and Cultural Relations of Discourse
        4.1.1 Sino-US Trade Friction
        4.1.2 Sino-US Trade War
    4.2 The Discourse Interaction Process of Sino-US Trade War
    4.3 Discourse Speaker
        4.3.1 The Overall Layout of Discourse Speakers
        4.3.2 Who Is Speaking
    4.4 Discourse Theme
        4.4.1 The Theme Setting of Media Discourse between Both Sides
        4.4.2 Comparison of Media Discourse Themes between Both Sides
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Micro Contrast and Analysis of News Discourse inSino-US Trade War
    5.1 Argumentative Strategy of China Daily's News Discourse
        5.1.1 The General Argumentation Structure of China Daily
        5.1.2 The Strategic Maneuvering in China Daily
    5.2 Argumentative Strategy of the New York Times'News Discourse
        5.2.1 The General Argumentation Structure of the New York Times
        5.2.2 The Strategic Maneuvering in the New York Times
    5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Implications
    6.1 Optimization of the Discourse Layout of Trade Friction Media Discourse
    6.2 Optimization of Argumentation Strategy of Trade Friction Media Discourse
Conclusions
    Major Findings of the Study
    Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Further Study
Works Cited
Acknowledgements
Appendix1 List of News Reports in China Daily
Appendix2 List of News Reports in the New York Times
Informative Abstract in Chinese
Résuméand Publications since Entering the Program


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]中美經(jīng)貿(mào)博弈下的國(guó)際規(guī)則應(yīng)對(duì)與核心利益保障[J]. 李賢森,廖小瑜.  科學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì). 2019(03)
[2]從框架理論看美國(guó)媒體報(bào)道中的中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)——以紐約時(shí)報(bào)為例[J]. 莫倩.  新聞戰(zhàn)線. 2019(04)
[3]中外媒體對(duì)中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)報(bào)道的比較分析——以《經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報(bào)》和《FT中文網(wǎng)》為例[J]. 何舒帆.  現(xiàn)代商業(yè). 2018(36)
[4]基于中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)話語(yǔ)的批評(píng)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究——趨近化理論的視角[J]. 顏冰,張輝.  外語(yǔ)研究. 2018(06)
[5]經(jīng)濟(jì)議題海外社交媒體傳播策略研究——以Twitter平臺(tái)三大央媒“中美貿(mào)易摩擦”報(bào)道為例[J]. 杭敏,李唯嘉.  全球傳媒學(xué)刊. 2018(04)
[6]中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的動(dòng)機(jī)及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J]. 鄭凡之.  現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè). 2019(01)
[7]超越霸權(quán)之爭(zhēng):中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)邏輯[J]. 鐘飛騰.  外交評(píng)論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)). 2018(06)
[8]中美博弈的矛盾沖突與中國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J]. 彭波.  國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作. 2018(10)
[9]體制認(rèn)定與經(jīng)貿(mào)糾紛——美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)的原因分析[J]. 王孜弘.  美國(guó)研究. 2018(05)
[10]中美貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)本質(zhì)、影響及對(duì)策分析[J]. 俞萍萍,趙永亮.  現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué). 2018(11)



本文編號(hào)：3232866