【摘要】：自2004年以來,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域Q幣被盜事件時有發(fā)生，用戶的合法權(quán)益受到侵害。但是，由于沒有明確的法律規(guī)定，對于用戶權(quán)利的保護只能根據(jù)《刑法》、《民法通則》、《物權(quán)法》、《合同法》等相關(guān)法律中的兜底條款或者司法解釋予以救濟。對Q幣定性不同又導致法院對于此類案件的定罪量刑標準不一，有的法院以盜竊罪、詐騙罪等財產(chǎn)性的犯罪進行定罪處罰，有的則以侵犯通信自由罪定罪量刑。在涉案金額的認定上，又存在“銷贓所得”、“實際損失”、“官方售價”等多重標準。 本文從Q幣誕生背景著手考察Q幣現(xiàn)狀，論證了Q幣的財產(chǎn)權(quán)利屬性，反駁了“物權(quán)說”、“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)說”、“新型財產(chǎn)說”，認為Q幣是一種新型的電子債權(quán)憑證。用戶與騰訊公司之間建立的基于服務(wù)合同的債權(quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系，用戶持有Q幣時，表明用戶與騰訊公司的合同成立且生效但是尚未開始履行。當用戶使用Q幣時，即時以此憑證要求騰訊公司履行服務(wù)合同的義務(wù)。當用戶用Q幣購買其他公司的實物或者服務(wù)時，乃是以行動同意騰訊公司將合同的義務(wù)全部或者部分轉(zhuǎn)移給第三人，并不是Q幣在行使貨幣職能�；诤贤P(guān)系的隨附保管義務(wù)，騰訊公司負責對Q幣憑證的保管，當出現(xiàn)第三人竊取Q幣時，屬于侵犯騰訊公司對于Q幣的本體權(quán)利及其騰訊公司與用戶之間的債權(quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系，第三人竊取Q幣并沒有消滅QQ用戶請求騰訊公司繼續(xù)履行債務(wù)的權(quán)利，而且在實際操作中，，Q幣未被使用之前只是存儲于騰訊公司網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)器中的一些信息存儲符號，騰訊公司有再為用戶發(fā)放憑證——向Q幣個人賬戶存入Q幣的可能。根據(jù)合同法，用戶有請求騰訊公司承擔停止侵害、排除妨礙、消除危險、繼續(xù)履行、賠償損失等責任的權(quán)利；根據(jù)合同法和侵權(quán)責任法，騰訊公司有請求侵權(quán)第三人承擔停止侵害、排除妨礙、消除危險、賠償損失等侵權(quán)責任。
[Abstract]:Since 2004, the theft of Q coins in the Internet has occurred from time to time, and the legitimate rights and interests of users have been infringed. However, in the absence of clear legal provisions, the protection of users' rights can only be alleviated according to the criminal law, the general principles of civil law, the property law, contract law and other relevant laws or judicial interpretation. The different characterization of Q coins leads to different standards of conviction and sentencing in this kind of cases. Some courts are convicted and punished for theft, fraud and other property crimes, while others are convicted and sentenced for violating the freedom of communication. In the determination of the amount involved, there are multiple standards, such as "proceeds of sale", "actual loss", "official selling price" and so on. This paper examines the present situation of Q coin from the background of the birth of Q coin, demonstrates the property right attribute of Q coin, refutes the theory of real right, the theory of intellectual property and the theory of new property, and holds that Q coin is a new type of electronic creditor's right certificate. The debt and debt relationship based on the service contract established between the user and Tencent. When the user holds Q coin, it indicates that the contract between the user and Tencent is established and takes effect but has not yet begun to be fulfilled. When users use Q coins, this certificate immediately requires Tencent to perform its service contract obligations. When users use Q coins to buy other companies' objects or services, they agree that Tencent will transfer all or part of the contract obligations to a third party, and that Q coins are not exercising monetary functions. Based on the attached custody obligation of the contractual relationship, Tencent is responsible for the custody of the Q coin voucher. When the third party steals the Q coin, it is an infringement of Tencent's Noumenon rights over the Q coin and the creditor and debt relationship between the Tencent company and the users. The theft of Q coins by a third party did not eliminate the right of QQ users to request Tencent to continue to fulfill its debts, and in practice, Q coins were only stored in Tencent's network servers before they were used. Tencent has the possibility of issuing vouchers to users to deposit Q coins into their personal accounts. According to contract law, users have the right to request Tencent company to bear the liability of stopping infringement, eliminating obstacles, eliminating danger, continuing to perform, compensation for losses and so on. According to contract law and tort liability law, Tencent company has requested the third party to bear tort liability, such as stop infringement, eliminate hindrance, eliminate danger, compensate for loss and so on.
【學位授予單位】：上海大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6;D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 帥青紅;;Q幣、U幣、POPO幣與電子貨幣[J];電子商務(wù);2007年01期

2 王竹;;《物權(quán)法》視野下的虛擬財產(chǎn)二分法及其法律規(guī)則[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年05期

3 尹田;論物權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的關(guān)系[J];法商研究;2002年05期

4 楊立新;王竹;;論物權(quán)法規(guī)定的物權(quán)客體中統(tǒng)一物的概念[J];法學家;2008年05期

5 劉杰;;淺析網(wǎng)絡(luò)中虛擬財產(chǎn)糾紛的分類[J];法制與社會;2007年09期

6 邢啟陽;;淺析虛擬貨幣法律問題[J];法制與社會;2011年31期

7 吳曉光;董海剛;李良;;論加強對虛擬貨幣市場的監(jiān)管[J];南方金融;2012年01期

8 馬艷平;;淺談物權(quán)法上之無體物[J];山西經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2007年04期

9 丁劭泊;;關(guān)于虛擬財產(chǎn)的法律屬性的思考[J];山西經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2007年04期

10 林旭霞;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)運營商與用戶之間協(xié)議的法律規(guī)制[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年05期

本文編號：2492503