網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的法律規(guī)制研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-07 16:21
【摘要】：科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步與網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識的普及促使網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)突飛猛進(jìn)的發(fā)展,但同時我們也應(yīng)當(dāng)看到網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位新問題的出現(xiàn)。2010年騰訊QQ與奇虎360一系列競爭行為的發(fā)生引發(fā)了人們對規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位法律的重新思考。 騰訊公司實(shí)施的強(qiáng)制客戶安裝電腦管家的行為與逼迫客戶“二選一”的行為是否屬于濫用市場支配地位的行為在司法界和學(xué)術(shù)界與實(shí)務(wù)界有著不同的看法,本案涉及法律問題較多,本文僅從法律角度圍繞騰訊QQ與奇虎360的案例研究以下問題：第一,為什么我國濫用市場支配地位的法律制度不能規(guī)制騰訊QQ與奇虎360之間的競爭行為?第二,為什么我國的反壟斷執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)沒有規(guī)制騰訊QQ濫用市場支配地位的行為?第三,為什么是在工信部和公安部的行政干預(yù)下騰訊QQ與奇虎360恢復(fù)兼容?第四,如何正確協(xié)調(diào)處理保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與反對壟斷之間的關(guān)系? 本文核心內(nèi)容分為四部分：第一部分對網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的基礎(chǔ)理論進(jìn)行闡述,包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)的含義和特征、網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的構(gòu)成要件,網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的表現(xiàn)形式及其特殊性、必要性等基礎(chǔ)理論,為后文分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的行為打下理論基礎(chǔ);第二部分包括我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位的現(xiàn)狀分析及其存在的問題,闡述網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位的立法現(xiàn)狀及其現(xiàn)實(shí)社會中法律的實(shí)施狀況,分析我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位存在的問題；第三部分介紹國外網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中規(guī)制濫用市場支配地位的相關(guān)制度,包括美國的三倍損害賠償制度、刑事法律手段打擊濫用行為等；第四部分提出規(guī)制我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的幾點(diǎn)建議,包括規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中濫用市場支配地位的整體規(guī)劃,完善責(zé)任主體范圍,完善監(jiān)管組織機(jī)構(gòu)的設(shè)想,合理分配舉證責(zé)任,加大行政責(zé)任的處罰力度,增加刑事責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式,協(xié)調(diào)反壟斷法與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的關(guān)系,加強(qiáng)中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)協(xié)會行業(yè)自律監(jiān)管。本文的不足之處在于并未對相關(guān)市場的界定、相關(guān)市場的支配地位以及相關(guān)市場是否存在濫用行為等理論進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的討論。
[Abstract]:The progress of science and technology and the popularization of network knowledge promote the rapid development of network economy. But at the same time, we should also see the emergence of new problems of abuse of market dominance in the network economy. The occurrence of a series of competition behaviors between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 in 2010 caused people to rethink the law of regulating abuse of market dominant position. Tencent's behavior of forcing customers to install PC manager and forcing customers to "choose one from two" behavior is a behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market. There are different views in the judicial and academic circles and between the practical circles and the judicial and academic circles. There are many legal issues involved in this case. This article only focuses on the case studies of Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 from a legal point of view. The following issues are discussed: first, Why can't the legal system of abusing market dominance in China regulate the competition between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360? Second, why does China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies not regulate Tencent QQ abuse of market dominance behavior? Third, why did Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 resume compatibility under the administrative intervention of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Ministry of Public Security? Fourth, how to correctly coordinate the relationship between the protection of intellectual property rights and anti-monopoly? The core content of this paper is divided into four parts: the first part expounds the basic theory of abuse of market dominant position in network economy, including the meaning and characteristics of network economy, and the constituent elements of abusing market dominant position in network economy. The basic theory of abusing market dominant position in network economy, such as its form, particularity and necessity, lays a theoretical foundation for analyzing the behavior of abusing market dominant position in network economy. The second part includes the analysis of the current situation of the regulation and abuse of market dominance in the network economy of our country and the existing problems, and expounds the legislative status of the regulation of the abuse of the market dominance in the network economy and the implementation of the law in the real society. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the regulation and abuse of the dominant position of the market in the network economy of our country. The third part introduces the related system of regulating the abuse of market dominance in the foreign network economy, including the triple damages system in the United States, criminal legal means to combat abuse and so on. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to regulate the abuse of market dominance in the network economy of our country, including the overall plan of regulating the abuse of market dominance in the network economy, perfecting the scope of the subject of responsibility and perfecting the regulatory organization. We should allocate the burden of proof rationally, strengthen the punishment of administrative responsibility, increase the way of assuming criminal responsibility, coordinate the relationship between anti-monopoly law and intellectual property protection, and strengthen the self-regulation of Chinese Internet Association industry. The deficiency of this paper is that there is no detailed discussion on the definition of the relevant market, the dominant position of the relevant market and the existence of abuse in the relevant market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29
本文編號：2454225
[Abstract]:The progress of science and technology and the popularization of network knowledge promote the rapid development of network economy. But at the same time, we should also see the emergence of new problems of abuse of market dominance in the network economy. The occurrence of a series of competition behaviors between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 in 2010 caused people to rethink the law of regulating abuse of market dominant position. Tencent's behavior of forcing customers to install PC manager and forcing customers to "choose one from two" behavior is a behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market. There are different views in the judicial and academic circles and between the practical circles and the judicial and academic circles. There are many legal issues involved in this case. This article only focuses on the case studies of Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 from a legal point of view. The following issues are discussed: first, Why can't the legal system of abusing market dominance in China regulate the competition between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360? Second, why does China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies not regulate Tencent QQ abuse of market dominance behavior? Third, why did Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 resume compatibility under the administrative intervention of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Ministry of Public Security? Fourth, how to correctly coordinate the relationship between the protection of intellectual property rights and anti-monopoly? The core content of this paper is divided into four parts: the first part expounds the basic theory of abuse of market dominant position in network economy, including the meaning and characteristics of network economy, and the constituent elements of abusing market dominant position in network economy. The basic theory of abusing market dominant position in network economy, such as its form, particularity and necessity, lays a theoretical foundation for analyzing the behavior of abusing market dominant position in network economy. The second part includes the analysis of the current situation of the regulation and abuse of market dominance in the network economy of our country and the existing problems, and expounds the legislative status of the regulation of the abuse of the market dominance in the network economy and the implementation of the law in the real society. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the regulation and abuse of the dominant position of the market in the network economy of our country. The third part introduces the related system of regulating the abuse of market dominance in the foreign network economy, including the triple damages system in the United States, criminal legal means to combat abuse and so on. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to regulate the abuse of market dominance in the network economy of our country, including the overall plan of regulating the abuse of market dominance in the network economy, perfecting the scope of the subject of responsibility and perfecting the regulatory organization. We should allocate the burden of proof rationally, strengthen the punishment of administrative responsibility, increase the way of assuming criminal responsibility, coordinate the relationship between anti-monopoly law and intellectual property protection, and strengthen the self-regulation of Chinese Internet Association industry. The deficiency of this paper is that there is no detailed discussion on the definition of the relevant market, the dominant position of the relevant market and the existence of abuse in the relevant market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 杜仲霞;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)下反壟斷法濫用市場支配地位的界定——評騰訊360案[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期
2 王雅平;;“3Q大戰(zhàn)”所引發(fā)的相關(guān)法律問題分析與思考[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期
3 何培育;鐘小飛;;論濫用市場支配地位行為的法律規(guī)制——兼評“騰訊與奇虎360”案[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期
4 唐要家,唐春暉;美國反托拉斯法的新發(fā)展與我國反壟斷法的效率原則指向[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年04期
5 許波;;論濫用市場支配地位反壟斷司法審判中的法律適用——以“百度案”和“網(wǎng)通案”為視角[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年05期
6 吳韜;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)反壟斷案件中的相關(guān)市場界定:美國的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年05期
7 王先林;論聯(lián)合限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制——《中華人民共和國反壟斷法(草擬稿)》的相關(guān)部分評析[J];法商研究;2004年05期
8 韓立余;;歐盟反托拉斯法的現(xiàn)代化[J];法學(xué)家;2004年05期
9 魏瓊;企業(yè)集中(或合并)法律控制的程序規(guī)定——兼議2004年《反壟斷法(送審稿)》[J];法學(xué);2004年11期
10 李劍;;百度“競價排名”非濫用市場支配地位行為[J];法學(xué);2009年03期
，本文編號：2454225
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2454225.html
最近更新
教材專著
