爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性問(wèn)題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-31 01:00
【摘要】：雖然調(diào)整商事關(guān)系的準(zhǔn)則與仲裁活動(dòng)在古羅馬法中已有體現(xiàn),但當(dāng)時(shí)商品交易在空間上與規(guī)模上的有限性,使得相關(guān)商業(yè)準(zhǔn)則的影響力較為薄弱。中世紀(jì)時(shí),來(lái)自不同城邦、不同港口進(jìn)行商事交易的商人們,通過(guò)自行設(shè)立的行商法院解決爭(zhēng)議,這樣的行商法院開(kāi)始具有現(xiàn)代仲裁或仲裁庭的性質(zhì)。隨著11世紀(jì)十字軍東征,威尼斯成為大批軍隊(duì)與后勤保障的轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)口,商品交易與貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)难杆侔l(fā)展促成了商人習(xí)慣法的萌芽與現(xiàn)代商事仲裁制度雛形的形成。自1697年英國(guó)議會(huì)正式承認(rèn)仲裁制度、產(chǎn)生了第一個(gè)仲裁法案起,作為一項(xiàng)古老爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制的仲裁呈現(xiàn)出顯著的發(fā)展前景,從國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁擴(kuò)展到國(guó)際商事仲裁。 國(guó)際商事仲裁源遠(yuǎn)流長(zhǎng),其中蘊(yùn)含的法理基礎(chǔ)、實(shí)證規(guī)則與價(jià)值規(guī)范更是博大精深。歷經(jīng)上千年的發(fā)展,國(guó)際商事仲裁逐步形成了在世界范圍內(nèi)得以普遍接受的基本規(guī)則。因我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展與對(duì)外交往的不斷加深,有關(guān)國(guó)際商事的爭(zhēng)議也必然會(huì)越來(lái)越多,一直以來(lái),商事仲裁是解決國(guó)際商事?tīng)?zhēng)議最常用的方法之一然而具有一定特性是適用國(guó)際商事仲裁的前提。仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)或仲裁庭對(duì)當(dāng)事人約定提交仲裁的爭(zhēng)議并非都可以行使管轄權(quán),實(shí)質(zhì)上這是國(guó)家對(duì)仲裁范圍施加的一種限制,這就涉及國(guó)際商事仲裁中爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性問(wèn)題,爭(zhēng)議的可仲裁性可以決定仲裁協(xié)議是否有效、管轄權(quán)的歸屬和仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行。因此,在國(guó)際商事仲裁中,爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性問(wèn)題一直都有非常重要的影響。 論文主要是從爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)可仲裁性的學(xué)理角度對(duì)其認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、性質(zhì)以及如何界定爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性進(jìn)行闡述。我國(guó)多數(shù)學(xué)者在商事仲裁的定性上有一個(gè)明確的界定,持公共政策這一學(xué)說(shuō)即其普遍支持的觀點(diǎn),在國(guó)際仲裁方面,多數(shù)的專家和學(xué)者對(duì)商事仲裁所下的定義為“爭(zhēng)議通過(guò)仲裁解決的界限是必須符合各國(guó)的公共政策和社會(huì)公共秩序,每一個(gè)國(guó)家都可以根據(jù)其各自的經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)政策,決定哪些爭(zhēng)議可以通過(guò)仲裁的方式解決,哪些爭(zhēng)議不能通過(guò)仲裁的方式解決”,在大陸法系國(guó)家主要在立法中加以界定,而在普通法系國(guó)家主要是在判例中加以界定。在論述可仲裁性的性質(zhì)時(shí),重點(diǎn)闡述了可仲裁性與公共政策和意思自治的關(guān)系在爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)可仲裁性的認(rèn)定時(shí),與上述二者有著緊密的聯(lián)系。 日益廣泛的商事交往,相互間的聯(lián)系愈發(fā)緊密,統(tǒng)一的國(guó)際商事仲裁模式是近年來(lái)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),第一,以往不能仲裁的爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng),現(xiàn)在也逐漸走入仲裁的視野;第二,商事主體的范圍逐漸擴(kuò)大,促使仲裁庭管轄范圍的擴(kuò)大。許多國(guó)家都開(kāi)始將反壟斷糾紛、證券爭(zhēng)議、破產(chǎn)爭(zhēng)議、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議納入可仲裁的范圍。論文最后以國(guó)際商事仲裁中爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)為立足點(diǎn),分析探究我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段的不足以及立法上的缺失,重點(diǎn)論述了反壟斷糾紛的可仲裁性問(wèn)題和證券爭(zhēng)議的可仲裁性問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Although the rules and the arbitration activities of the adjustment of the commercial relation have been embodied in the ancient Roman law, the commodity trading at that time is limited in space and in size, so that the influence of the relevant commercial norms is weak. In the Middle Ages, businessmen from different urban and different ports for commercial transactions settled the dispute through a self-established business court, which began to have the nature of modern arbitration or arbitral tribunals. With the crusade of the Crusades in the 11th century, Venice has become the transfer port of a large number of troops and logistics, and the rapid development of the commodity transaction and the transport of goods has led to the formation of the embryonic development of the merchant's customary law and the embryonic development of the modern commercial arbitration system. Since the British Parliament formally recognized the arbitration system in 1697, the first arbitration act was created, and the arbitration as an old dispute settlement mechanism showed a remarkable development prospect and extended from domestic arbitration to international commercial arbitration. The international commercial arbitration has a long history, including the legal basis, the positive rule and the value standard, and the great essence of the international commercial arbitration. With the development of the last millennium, international commercial arbitration has formed a universal acceptance of the basic rules in the world However, because of the development of our economy and the deepening of foreign exchanges, the disputes on international commercial law must be more and more, and the commercial arbitration has been one of the most commonly used methods to solve the problem of international commercial disputes. However, it has a certain characteristic that it is applicable to the application of the international commercial arbitration The arbitral body or the arbitral tribunal may not, in essence, exercise its jurisdiction over the dispute that the parties agree to submit to the arbitration, which is, in essence, a limitation of the State's application to the scope of the arbitration, which relates to the justiciability of the dispute in international commercial arbitration The arbitrability of the dispute may determine whether the arbitration agreement is valid, the ownership of the jurisdiction, and the recognition and holding of the arbitral award. Therefore, in the international commercial arbitration, the issue of the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute has always been very important In response, the thesis is mainly from the theory of the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute, the criteria and the nature of its determination, and how to define the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute. Most of the scholars in our country have a clear definition of the nature of commercial arbitration. The theory of public policy is its universal support. In the aspect of international arbitration, most of the experts and scholars have the definition of "The delay of input through the commercial arbitration". nk>, in the continental law system, is mainly defined in the legislation, while in common law countries are mainly in the case In this paper, when the nature of the arbitrability is discussed, it is emphasized that the relationship between the arbitrability and the public policy and the meaning self-government has a close relationship with the two of the above-mentioned two. In recent years, the international commercial arbitration model is the developing trend in recent years, and the first, the disputes that cannot be arbitrated in the past, are now gradually entering the field of view of the arbitration; and the second, the case of the commercial subject The expansion of the perimeter led to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal The scope of the expansion. Many countries have begun to include antimonopoly disputes, securities disputes, bankruptcy disputes, and intellectual property disputes into the The thesis concludes with the developing trend of the arbitrability of the dispute in the international commercial arbitration, analyzes the shortcomings of the present stage and the absence of the legislation, and focuses on the arbitrability of the anti-monopoly dispute and the negotiable securities dispute.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D925.7
本文編號(hào)：2450675
[Abstract]:Although the rules and the arbitration activities of the adjustment of the commercial relation have been embodied in the ancient Roman law, the commodity trading at that time is limited in space and in size, so that the influence of the relevant commercial norms is weak. In the Middle Ages, businessmen from different urban and different ports for commercial transactions settled the dispute through a self-established business court, which began to have the nature of modern arbitration or arbitral tribunals. With the crusade of the Crusades in the 11th century, Venice has become the transfer port of a large number of troops and logistics, and the rapid development of the commodity transaction and the transport of goods has led to the formation of the embryonic development of the merchant's customary law and the embryonic development of the modern commercial arbitration system. Since the British Parliament formally recognized the arbitration system in 1697, the first arbitration act was created, and the arbitration as an old dispute settlement mechanism showed a remarkable development prospect and extended from domestic arbitration to international commercial arbitration. The international commercial arbitration has a long history, including the legal basis, the positive rule and the value standard, and the great essence of the international commercial arbitration. With the development of the last millennium, international commercial arbitration has formed a universal acceptance of the basic rules in the world However, because of the development of our economy and the deepening of foreign exchanges, the disputes on international commercial law must be more and more, and the commercial arbitration has been one of the most commonly used methods to solve the problem of international commercial disputes. However, it has a certain characteristic that it is applicable to the application of the international commercial arbitration The arbitral body or the arbitral tribunal may not, in essence, exercise its jurisdiction over the dispute that the parties agree to submit to the arbitration, which is, in essence, a limitation of the State's application to the scope of the arbitration, which relates to the justiciability of the dispute in international commercial arbitration The arbitrability of the dispute may determine whether the arbitration agreement is valid, the ownership of the jurisdiction, and the recognition and holding of the arbitral award. Therefore, in the international commercial arbitration, the issue of the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute has always been very important In response, the thesis is mainly from the theory of the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute, the criteria and the nature of its determination, and how to define the arbitrability of the matter of the dispute. Most of the scholars in our country have a clear definition of the nature of commercial arbitration. The theory of public policy is its universal support. In the aspect of international arbitration, most of the experts and scholars have the definition of "The delay of input through the commercial arbitration". nk>, in the continental law system, is mainly defined in the legislation, while in common law countries are mainly in the case In this paper, when the nature of the arbitrability is discussed, it is emphasized that the relationship between the arbitrability and the public policy and the meaning self-government has a close relationship with the two of the above-mentioned two. In recent years, the international commercial arbitration model is the developing trend in recent years, and the first, the disputes that cannot be arbitrated in the past, are now gradually entering the field of view of the arbitration; and the second, the case of the commercial subject The expansion of the perimeter led to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal The scope of the expansion. Many countries have begun to include antimonopoly disputes, securities disputes, bankruptcy disputes, and intellectual property disputes into the The thesis concludes with the developing trend of the arbitrability of the dispute in the international commercial arbitration, analyzes the shortcomings of the present stage and the absence of the legislation, and focuses on the arbitrability of the anti-monopoly dispute and the negotiable securities dispute.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D925.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 王健;;反壟斷法私人執(zhí)行的優(yōu)越性及其實(shí)現(xiàn)——兼論中國(guó)反壟斷法引入私人執(zhí)行制度的必要性和立法建議[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期
2 李國(guó)海;反壟斷法損害賠償制度比較研究[J];法商研究;2004年06期
3 黃進(jìn);馬德才;;國(guó)際商事?tīng)?zhēng)議可仲裁范圍的擴(kuò)展趨勢(shì)之探析——兼評(píng)我國(guó)有關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年03期
4 張艾清;;國(guó)際商事仲裁中公共政策事項(xiàng)的可仲裁性問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年06期
5 楊月萍;;爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)可仲裁性的重新審視[J];欽州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期
6 杜新麗;;論爭(zhēng)議事項(xiàng)可仲裁性的認(rèn)定[J];人民司法;2008年15期
7 王德玲;;爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性問(wèn)題探究[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年07期
8 楊峰;我國(guó)證券強(qiáng)制仲裁若干問(wèn)題研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
9 周成泓;;中國(guó)證券仲裁制度略論[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年12期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條
1 沈四寶 王曉川 沈建中;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2002年
2 本報(bào)記者 孫東輝;[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2006年
，本文編號(hào)：2450675
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2450675.html
最近更新
教材專著
