【摘要】：廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)權(quán)是一個(gè)嶄新而復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題，，給我國(guó)立法和司法的適用帶來(lái)了巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。為了破解這一難題，理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界紛紛提出自己的見(jiàn)解。本文主要以四個(gè)案例引出廢舊產(chǎn)品的回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)之爭(zhēng)，對(duì)提出的爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行了有理有據(jù)的分析。緊接著以此為基點(diǎn)，通過(guò)以混淆理論、商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則、公共政策理論等商標(biāo)法的基礎(chǔ)理論為切入點(diǎn)，對(duì)爭(zhēng)議考慮到的因素進(jìn)行了考量，提出了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是侵犯商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)的行為的觀(guān)點(diǎn)。主要框架如下： 第一部分主要陳述了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用的法律性質(zhì)之爭(zhēng)。本部分主要簡(jiǎn)單界定了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用的概念，并通過(guò)四個(gè)典型案例引出了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用的四種情形。在案件處理的過(guò)程中，學(xué)界對(duì)廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)的問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重分歧。通過(guò)整合對(duì)廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵權(quán)的爭(zhēng)論，為下文的論證提供了一個(gè)良好的鋪墊。 第二部分主要提出了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用侵權(quán)與否的判斷應(yīng)該以混淆理論為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在判斷廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)時(shí)，主要借助了美國(guó)在處理廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)權(quán)方面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)即說(shuō)明真實(shí)情況原則，認(rèn)為說(shuō)明真實(shí)情況是混淆理論應(yīng)考慮的一個(gè)因素。緊靠這個(gè)因素并結(jié)合混淆理論的基本原理對(duì)第一部分提出的四個(gè)案件進(jìn)行了逐一分析和判斷。最終認(rèn)為廢舊產(chǎn)品的回收利用是侵犯商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)的。 第三部分提出了商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則是廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用侵權(quán)判定應(yīng)考慮到的因素。首先通過(guò)簡(jiǎn)單梳理世界主要國(guó)家對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則作出的規(guī)定，認(rèn)為廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡原則的例外；其次對(duì)廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用不適用商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的原因進(jìn)行了分析；最后提出了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用存在商標(biāo)權(quán)用盡的情形。 第四部分主要分析了在判斷廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用是否侵犯商標(biāo)權(quán)時(shí)不能用公共政策理論進(jìn)行抗辯。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)不僅具有私權(quán)屬性還有公共政策屬性。它已經(jīng)成為市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的工具。各國(guó)紛紛提出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略，想占領(lǐng)市場(chǎng)的制高點(diǎn)。在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)公共政策屬性的基礎(chǔ)之上，有人提出了廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用可以用公共政策來(lái)抗辯商標(biāo)侵權(quán)。本人不贊同此種觀(guān)點(diǎn)，認(rèn)為在廢舊產(chǎn)品回收利用中是不能用公共政策因素來(lái)進(jìn)行抗辯的。
[Abstract]:Whether the recycling of waste products infringes trademark right is a brand-new and complicated problem, which brings great challenge to the application of legislation and judicature in our country. In order to solve this problem, theorists and practical circles have put forward their own opinions. In this paper, four cases are used to find out whether the recycling of waste products infringes the legal nature of trademark rights, and the dispute is analyzed reasonably. Then, based on the theory of confusion, the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, the theory of public policy and other basic theories of trademark law, the author takes into account the factors taken into account in the dispute. This paper puts forward the viewpoint that recycling and utilization of waste products is a violation of trademark exclusive right. The main framework is as follows: the first part mainly describes the legal nature of waste products. In this part, the concept of recycling of waste products is defined, and four kinds of cases of recycling of waste products are introduced through four typical cases. In the process of dealing with the case, there are serious differences in the issue of whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the exclusive right of trademark. Through the integration of the waste product recycling infringement or not, this paper provides a good preparation for the following argument. In the second part, it is put forward that the judgment of recycling infringement of waste products should be based on the confusion theory. In judging whether the recycling of waste products infringes the right to exclusive use of trademarks, it mainly relies on the experience of the United States in dealing with whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes on trademark rights, that is to say, the principle of the true situation. It is considered that explaining the real situation is a factor to be taken into account in the theory of confusion. On the basis of this factor and the basic principle of confusion theory, the four cases put forward in the first part are analyzed and judged one by one. Finally, it is considered that the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes the right of exclusive use of trademarks. The third part puts forward that the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is the factor that should be taken into account in the judgment of the infringement of recycling and utilization of waste products. First of all, by simply combing the provisions made by the major countries in the world on the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, it is considered that recycling of waste products is the exception to the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights; Secondly, this paper analyzes the reasons why the recycling and utilization of waste products are not applicable to the exhaustion of trademark rights, and finally puts forward the situation of the exhaustion of trademark rights in the recycling and utilization of waste products. The fourth part mainly analyzes that the public policy theory can not be used in judging whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the trademark right. Intellectual property has not only the attribute of private right but also the attribute of public policy. It has become a tool for market competition. Countries have put forward intellectual property strategy, want to occupy the commanding heights of the market. On the basis of the public policy attribute of intellectual property rights, some people put forward that the recycling and utilization of waste products can defend trademark infringement by public policy. I do not agree with this view that the recycling of waste products can not be defended by public policy factors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 祝建軍;;“舊手機(jī)換新殼”侵犯注冊(cè)商標(biāo)專(zhuān)用權(quán)[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年11期

2 高榮林;;舊物新用與商標(biāo)侵權(quán)[J];中華商標(biāo);2010年06期

3 黃細(xì)江;;翻新手機(jī)的商標(biāo)問(wèn)題[J];中華商標(biāo);2012年01期

4 馮曉青;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問(wèn)題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

5 鄧宏光;;商標(biāo)混淆理論的擴(kuò)張[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年10期

6 黃匯;;售前混淆之批判和售后混淆之證成——兼談我國(guó)《商標(biāo)法》的第三次修改[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年06期

7 祖翠筠;;突破回收再造的瓶頸[J];21世紀(jì)商業(yè)評(píng)論;2009年08期

8 吳漢東;;利弊之間:知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的政策科學(xué)分析[J];法商研究;2006年05期

9 吳漢東;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的平衡精神與平衡理論——馮曉青教授《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法利益平衡理論》評(píng)析[J];法商研究;2007年05期

10 萬(wàn)志前;鄭友德;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度生態(tài)化重構(gòu)初探[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年01期

本文編號(hào)：2440408