【摘要】：時代的發(fā)展、科技的進步無時不刻地推動著信息溝通的多樣化，，身邊的手機、電腦等電子設(shè)備宣告著我們已經(jīng)進入了全面互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的信息化時代。凡事必有兩面性，我們在享受網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展帶給我們的便利和快捷信息溝通服務(wù)的同時，網(wǎng)絡(luò)自身的一些特質(zhì)給網(wǎng)民造成了許多的困擾，形式多樣的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法犯罪活動充斥于網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間，同時由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的虛擬化以及我國缺乏網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪方面的法律方面的規(guī)制而造成我國現(xiàn)在的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)詐騙和侵權(quán)方面的犯罪無法受到及時、有效的處理。鑒于此種情況的存在，常常使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙和侵權(quán)犯罪分子無法得到有效的打擊和制裁。綜合考慮到上述情況，網(wǎng)絡(luò)實名制應(yīng)運而生。 但作為微博的使用者卻因為實名制感受到了無形的限制，這就會影響了微博主所期待的言論自由和“意見市場1”的最終產(chǎn)生。造成這種情況的原因在于微博實名制的出臺使得微博主會在發(fā)布一些較為敏感的言論時會有所顧忌而影響言論的多樣性，從而使得微博主所發(fā)布的言論無形中受到壓制。因此，微博實名制被視作一種有效的控制網(wǎng)民言論內(nèi)容的強制形式，在我國的相關(guān)領(lǐng)域引起了巨大的爭議。筆者把微博實名制引起的法律爭議當做自己的研究內(nèi)容，希望能夠結(jié)合自身所學(xué)定位好網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由以及由此產(chǎn)生的個人權(quán)利問題比如名譽權(quán)、隱私權(quán)以及知識產(chǎn)權(quán)方面的二者之間的平衡點。 本文共分為三個部分：第一部分主要從微博實名制與網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由的內(nèi)涵入手，引出其與個人權(quán)利如隱私權(quán)、名譽權(quán)和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)之間的聯(lián)系；第二部分主要是結(jié)合我國和國外典型案例，從正反兩個方面探討了微博實名制在我國引起的法律問題；第三部分是關(guān)于微博實名制的法律關(guān)系構(gòu)建的研究，結(jié)合本人所學(xué)，從完善法律機制和提高法律意識方面提出了一點個人見解，以期對我國微博實名制帶來的網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由和個人權(quán)利的雙方法律關(guān)系的明晰有所幫助。
[Abstract]:With the development of the times and the progress of science and technology, the diversification of information communication has been promoted all the time. The mobile phones, computers and other electronic devices around us have announced that we have entered the information age of the full-scale Internet. There must be two sides to everything. While we enjoy the convenience and fast information communication services brought to us by the development of the network, some of the characteristics of the network itself have caused a lot of trouble to the netizens. Various forms of Internet illegal and criminal activities are full of cyberspace, At the same time, due to the virtualization of the network and the lack of legal regulation on cybercrime in our country, the Internet fraud and tort crime in our country can not be dealt with in a timely and effective manner. In view of the existence of this situation, cyberfraud and tortious criminals are often unable to be effectively dealt with and sanctioned. Considering the above situation, network real-name system emerges as the times require. However, the users of Weibo felt the invisible restriction because of the real name system, which would affect Weibo's expected freedom of speech and the final emergence of "opinion Market 1". The reason for this situation is that the introduction of Weibo's real-name system will make Weibo will publish some sensitive speech will have some scruples and affect the diversity of speech, thereby making Weibo's published remarks virtually suppressed. Therefore, Weibo's real name system is regarded as an effective compulsory form to control the content of netizens' speech, which has caused great controversy in the related fields of our country. The author regards the legal controversy caused by Weibo's real name system as his own research content, and hopes to position the freedom of speech on the Internet and the personal rights issues, such as the right of reputation, arising from his own study. The balance between privacy and intellectual property. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part begins with the connotation of Weibo's real name system and network freedom of speech, and leads to the connection between Weibo's real name system and personal rights, such as privacy, reputation and intellectual property rights; The second part mainly discusses the legal problems caused by the real name system of Weibo in our country from the positive and negative aspects combined with the typical cases of our country and abroad. The third part is about the research on the construction of Weibo's real-name legal relationship, combining with my study, I put forward some personal opinions from the aspects of perfecting the legal mechanism and raising the legal consciousness. It is expected to help to clarify the legal relationship between the Internet freedom of speech and individual rights brought by the real name system of Weibo in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923;D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮娟;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)生態(tài)的一場博弈——“微博實名制”與密碼危機[J];東南傳播;2012年03期

2 許蕾;尚勤;;從微博實名制看我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)新聞業(yè)的自由與規(guī)范[J];東南傳播;2012年06期

3 博文;;遭遇反對,博客實名制將走向何方?[J];電腦知識與技術(shù)(經(jīng)驗技巧);2007年01期

4 馬強;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)實名制:良藥還是萬金油？[J];電子商務(wù);2007年03期

5 胡壬;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實名制 第一聲槍響[J];電子商務(wù);2007年09期

6 楊福忠;;公民網(wǎng)絡(luò)匿名表達權(quán)之憲法保護——兼論網(wǎng)絡(luò)實名制的正當性[J];法商研究;2012年05期

7 郭洋;;博客實名制 是海水還是火焰?[J];多媒體世界;2007年03期

8 ;博客實名制:自由與規(guī)范的較量[J];電腦愛好者;2006年22期

9 毅龍;;中國進入實名時代? 博客實名制大討論[J];電腦迷;2006年22期

10 滿堂喝彩;;實名會翻身[J];電腦迷;2010年13期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王弋;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實名制涉及的主要法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

2 張棟;關(guān)于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)實名制的法律問題思考[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：2440213