【摘要】：跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定(Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,簡(jiǎn)稱 TPP)是國(guó)際重要的多邊經(jīng)濟(jì)談判組織,因美國(guó)加入和推動(dòng)而引起世界廣泛關(guān)注。2017年1月美國(guó)宣布退出TPP,再次引起廣泛討論。該組織于2015年成功結(jié)束貿(mào)易談判,并達(dá)成TPP協(xié)議。TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事賠償規(guī)則的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)要遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于我國(guó)以TRIPS協(xié)議為基礎(chǔ)的民事賠償規(guī)則的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。本文將TPP民事賠償規(guī)則與TRIPS協(xié)議民事賠償規(guī)則相對(duì)比,反思我國(guó)民事賠償規(guī)則的不足。在此基礎(chǔ)上,充分論證我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事賠償規(guī)則應(yīng)對(duì)TPP的必要性,進(jìn)而對(duì)我國(guó)民事賠償規(guī)則提出法律應(yīng)對(duì)建議。TPP規(guī)則在賠償責(zé)任主體,賠償范圍,賠償方式方面提出高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)賠償規(guī)則。其中訴訟費(fèi)用的主體支付規(guī)則、合理價(jià)值評(píng)估規(guī)則以及懲罰性賠償方式適用規(guī)則充分保護(hù)了權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利,嚴(yán)懲侵權(quán)行為,保障知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易順利進(jìn)行,符合世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展趨勢(shì),為完善我國(guó)法律規(guī)范提供樣本。在確定賠償范圍和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí),采用合理價(jià)值評(píng)估規(guī)則,司法機(jī)關(guān)綜合考慮權(quán)利人所提交的任何合理價(jià)值證據(jù),同時(shí)對(duì)其進(jìn)行評(píng)估判斷,結(jié)合我國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐,綜合確定賠償數(shù)額,充分保護(hù)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利。在權(quán)利人通過(guò)法律途徑維護(hù)自身權(quán)利的問(wèn)題上,法律應(yīng)當(dāng)在一定程度上給予權(quán)利人充分維護(hù)自身權(quán)利的方式,自主選擇法定賠償方式或懲罰性賠償方式。在訴訟費(fèi)用主體支付責(zé)任方面,法律應(yīng)明確規(guī)定敗訴方支付在訴訟中產(chǎn)生的合理費(fèi)用,明確主體責(zé)任,維護(hù)司法實(shí)踐的統(tǒng)一與穩(wěn)定。TPP規(guī)則為民事賠償規(guī)則發(fā)展起到示范和引領(lǐng)作用。我國(guó)應(yīng)該充分利用TPP給我國(guó)法律制度發(fā)展帶來(lái)的契機(jī),積極應(yīng)對(duì)TPP所帶來(lái)的挑戰(zhàn),結(jié)合我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐,樹(shù)立符合我國(guó)發(fā)展的高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度,充分維護(hù)正當(dāng)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利,在國(guó)際社會(huì)贏得話語(yǔ)權(quán)和主動(dòng)權(quán),這是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律規(guī)范的職責(zé)所在,是法治社會(huì)的必然要求,也是法律人的畢生追求。
[Abstract]:The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,) is an important international multilateral economic negotiation organization, which has attracted worldwide attention because of the United States' accession and promotion. In January 2017, the announcement of the withdrawal of the United States from the TPP, has once again aroused widespread discussion. The organization successfully concluded the trade negotiations in 2015 and reached the TPP agreement. The protection standard of the TPP intellectual property civil compensation rules is much higher than that of the civil compensation rules based on the TRIPS agreement in our country. This paper compares the TPP civil compensation rules with the TRIPS civil compensation rules and reflects on the shortcomings of China's civil compensation rules. On this basis, it fully demonstrates the necessity of the civil compensation rules of intellectual property rights in our country in response to TPP, and then puts forward legal suggestions to the civil compensation rules of our country. The TPP rules are in the main body of compensation and the scope of compensation. In the form of compensation, a high standard compensation rule is proposed. The rules of payment of litigation expenses, the rules of reasonable value evaluation and the applicable rules of punitive damages have fully protected the legitimate rights of the obligee, severely punished the infringement, and ensured the smooth progress of the trade in intellectual property. In line with the development trend of intellectual property in the world, provide a sample for perfecting the legal norms of our country. In determining the scope and standard of compensation, the judicial organs should adopt the rule of reasonable value evaluation, consider comprehensively any reasonable value evidence submitted by the obligee, at the same time evaluate and judge it, combine the judicial practice of our country, comprehensively determine the amount of compensation. The legitimate rights of the obligee shall be fully protected. To a certain extent, the law should give the right holder the right to fully protect their own rights, and choose the legal compensation or punitive compensation. In respect of the liability of the subject of the lawsuit, the law should clearly stipulate that the losing party should pay the reasonable expenses incurred in the lawsuit, and make clear the responsibility of the subject. Maintain the unity and stability of judicial practice. TPP rules play an exemplary and leading role in the development of civil compensation rules. Our country should make full use of the opportunity that TPP brings to the development of our legal system, actively respond to the challenge brought by TPP, combine with our judicial practice, set up a high standard intellectual property system that accords with the development of our country. It is the duty of intellectual property legal norms, the inevitable requirement of the society of rule of law, and the pursuit of the legal person's life to fully safeguard the legitimate rights of the legitimate right holder and win the right of speech and initiative in the international community.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 周雪雅;;TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則及其影響[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2016年17期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 馬靈飛;TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其應(yīng)對(duì)[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

2 錢鑫;淺析TPP的發(fā)展前景以及對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[D];外交學(xué)院;2014年

3 謝中偉;論TPP中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)規(guī)則的新趨勢(shì)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

4 鄭雙雙;跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定（TPP）法律層面解析與對(duì)策[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

5 侯云哲;美國(guó)加入TPP對(duì)中國(guó)的影響及對(duì)策研究[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

6 張琳達(dá);跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議（TPP）對(duì)中國(guó)未來(lái)對(duì)外貿(mào)易影響分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2337288