【摘要】：摘要：群體性專利侵權(quán)行為是數(shù)個侵權(quán)主體在知道或應(yīng)當(dāng)知道有其他侵權(quán)人正在或即將實施同一侵權(quán)行為的情況下分別惡意實施了侵犯同一專利權(quán)的行為。近年來我國群體性專利侵權(quán)案件呈上升趨勢,而其暴露出的巨大危害性和專利權(quán)人維權(quán)難的問題不容忽視。群體性專利侵權(quán)行為與共同侵權(quán)行為、共同犯罪行為、假冒專利行為等相關(guān)概念有著密切聯(lián)系,都是數(shù)人實施的侵權(quán)行為或者侵權(quán)專利權(quán)利的行為,在實踐上很容易混淆,但其又有著本質(zhì)的區(qū)別,弄清幾者的關(guān)系有助于我們更好地處理群體性專利侵權(quán)案件。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)意識淡薄、經(jīng)濟(jì)利益驅(qū)動、法律保護(hù)缺位等因素是群體性專利侵權(quán)行為產(chǎn)生的原因,要徹底解決群體性專利侵權(quán)問題,需要完善現(xiàn)有法律制度。目前我國專利保護(hù)方面的法律存在些許缺陷,應(yīng)當(dāng)從現(xiàn)行民事保護(hù)、行政保護(hù)、刑事保護(hù)三方面的缺陷為切入點(diǎn),進(jìn)而完善：民事方面,建議增設(shè)懲罰性賠償,同時為了切實維護(hù)專利權(quán)人的利益應(yīng)改變現(xiàn)在“原告就被告”的管轄原則；行政方面,應(yīng)賦予管理專利工作的行政部門主動查處權(quán)、調(diào)查取證權(quán)、行政罰款權(quán),并就具體操作問題出臺相應(yīng)的實施細(xì)則；刑事方面,建議在刑法中增設(shè)群體性專利侵權(quán)相關(guān)罪名,并設(shè)置相應(yīng)的處罰追究侵權(quán)人的刑事責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: group patent infringement is that several tortfeasors maliciously violate the same patent right when they know or should know that there are other infringers who are committing or about to commit the same infringement. In recent years, the cases of group patent infringement in our country are on the rise, but the great harmfulness exposed by them and the difficulty of protecting the rights of the patentee can not be ignored. Group patent infringement is closely related to joint infringement, joint criminal behavior, counterfeit patent act and other related concepts. It is an act of infringement or infringement of patent rights carried out by several people. It is easy to be confused in practice. However, there are essential differences between them, so it is helpful for us to deal with group patent infringement cases. The weak consciousness of intellectual property, the drive of economic interests and the absence of legal protection are the causes of group patent infringement. To solve the problem of group patent infringement, it is necessary to perfect the existing legal system. At present, there are some defects in the law of patent protection in our country. We should start with the defects in the three aspects of current civil protection, administrative protection and criminal protection, and perfect them: in the civil aspect, it is suggested that punitive damages should be added. At the same time, in order to effectively safeguard the interests of the patentee, it is necessary to change the current jurisdiction principle of the "plaintiff on the defendant"; in the administrative aspect, the administrative department in charge of patent work should be given the power to initiate investigation and deal with the case, the right to investigate and collect evidence, and the right of administrative fine. In criminal aspects, it is suggested to add group patent infringement related charges in the criminal law and set up corresponding penalties to investigate the criminal liability of the infringer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉軼;;共同侵權(quán)理論問題研究[J];法制與社會;2010年35期

2 謝曉玲;;我國專利權(quán)保護(hù)的問題與對策[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期

3 仝建勛;;共同侵權(quán)本質(zhì)的研究[J];改革與開放;2011年12期

4 杜榮霞;劉冰;;從群體性侵權(quán)透視知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化意識的培植[J];河北法學(xué);2010年06期

5 王修玨;;專利侵權(quán)行為犯罪化的邊緣性審視[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

6 吳漢東;關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)私權(quán)屬性的再認(rèn)識——兼評“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公權(quán)化”理論[J];社會科學(xué);2005年10期

7 劉海安;;共同侵權(quán)之“共同”標(biāo)準(zhǔn):反思與重構(gòu)[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年03期

，

本文編號：2218782