【摘要】：外觀設(shè)計(jì)在我國是作為一種專利在專利法中得到保護(hù)，但其與發(fā)明、實(shí)用新型存在本質(zhì)的區(qū)別。在我國法院審理專利糾紛案件中，外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利侵權(quán)糾紛占比較大，而外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利侵權(quán)糾紛審理的關(guān)鍵在于對涉案外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利與被訴侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品外觀相似性的的認(rèn)定。在這一認(rèn)定過程中對于外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利的創(chuàng)造性問題、侵權(quán)認(rèn)定主體、侵權(quán)認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等問題，理論與實(shí)務(wù)上存在較大的爭議。針對這種現(xiàn)狀，實(shí)有對外觀設(shè)計(jì)專利侵權(quán)認(rèn)定進(jìn)行研究的必要。 現(xiàn)代意義上的外觀設(shè)計(jì)起源于對產(chǎn)品的外表進(jìn)行裝飾以吸引消費(fèi)者并與同類商品相區(qū)別的市場競爭需要。故認(rèn)定被訴侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán)，應(yīng)從市場競爭的角度進(jìn)行考慮，并以外觀設(shè)計(jì)產(chǎn)品的消費(fèi)者在購買時(shí)是否會(huì)混淆來認(rèn)定被訴侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品是否影響原告產(chǎn)品的銷售。我國現(xiàn)行的整體視覺效果認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的基礎(chǔ)上吸收了創(chuàng)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的合理內(nèi)核，在實(shí)務(wù)中靈活應(yīng)用可以滿足審判實(shí)踐的需要。 由于外觀設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)際上是一種相對于著作權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)、純粹技術(shù)方案而言獨(dú)立的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，為更好地促進(jìn)外觀設(shè)計(jì)的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展，加強(qiáng)對外觀設(shè)計(jì)的保護(hù)，從而增加社會(huì)福利，筆者認(rèn)為我國應(yīng)當(dāng)制定專門的外觀設(shè)計(jì)法、提高外觀專利的授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、建立部分外觀專利制度、建立外觀專利司法統(tǒng)計(jì)調(diào)查制度。
[Abstract]:Design is protected in patent law as a kind of patent in our country, but it is different from invention and utility model in essence. In the court of our country, the patent infringement dispute of design is relatively large, and the key of patent infringement of design is to identify the appearance similarity between the patent involved and the product being infringed. In this process, there is a great dispute between theory and practice about the creative problem of design patent, the subject of infringement and the standard of infringement. In view of this situation, it is necessary to study the patent infringement of design. Modern design originates from the competitive need of decorating the appearance of the product in order to attract consumers and distinguish it from the same kind of goods. Therefore, it should be considered from the angle of market competition to determine whether the infringed product is constituted of infringement, and whether the consumer of the design product will be confused to determine whether the infringed product affected the sales of the plaintiff's product. On the basis of confusing standard, the current standard of overall visual effect in our country absorbs the reasonable kernel of innovation standard, and the flexible application in practice can meet the needs of trial practice. Because a design is actually an independent intellectual property right relative to copyright, trademark rights, and purely technical programs, in order to better promote the innovation and development of the design, strengthen the protection of the design, and thus increase social welfare, The author thinks that our country should make special design law, improve the authorization standard of appearance patent, establish part of appearance patent system, and establish judicial investigation system of appearance patent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 梁浩;;產(chǎn)品部分外觀設(shè)計(jì)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

2 胡充寒;;我國外觀設(shè)計(jì)定義之應(yīng)然性重構(gòu)[J];科技與法律;2009年06期

3 雷永青;;再見了,冥王星![J];蘇南科技開發(fā);2006年09期

4 程永順;外觀設(shè)計(jì)授權(quán)審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及方式的質(zhì)疑[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年01期

，

本文編號：2193045