【摘要】：在當(dāng)今社會,正值技術(shù)革命時(shí)期,要想推動我國社會主義事業(yè)又好又快的建設(shè),推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展是必不可少的。我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)自改革開放以來如井噴式發(fā)展,’極大的帶動了經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。但在這背后卻有一個(gè)不容忽視的問題即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)刻不容緩。在我國每一年都有大量的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)事件發(fā)生,僅僅通過司法保護(hù)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠。尤其在我國,推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)的法律制度完善,能夠極大的保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)免受不法侵害,推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)事業(yè)發(fā)展。論文從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)的概念開始論述,闡述知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)重要意義,通過分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法律法規(guī)規(guī)定與行政保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀,闡述現(xiàn)行我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)基本情況,運(yùn)用數(shù)據(jù)分析方法,并從機(jī)構(gòu)、立法、執(zhí)法、行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)銜接五個(gè)方面分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)中存在的問題,剖析外域知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)保護(hù)經(jīng)驗(yàn),并加以借鑒,對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)存在的問題提出了較為合理的解決方案。應(yīng)通過整合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu),設(shè)立統(tǒng)一高效的行政機(jī)構(gòu),培養(yǎng)高素質(zhì)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政人才強(qiáng)化知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)能力建設(shè)；健全知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)的法律體系,規(guī)定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政執(zhí)法主體的法律責(zé)任,完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政執(zhí)法體系；依法移送案件杜絕“以罰代刑”,建立完善的證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化規(guī)則,建立知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)鑒定體系,加強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)的銜接；嚴(yán)格按照行政程序基本原則,確保程序正義,避免行政權(quán)力濫用,損害當(dāng)事人利益。
[Abstract]:In today's society, it is necessary to promote the development of intellectual property in order to promote the construction of socialism in China. China's intellectual property rights since the reform and opening up, such as blowout development has greatly driven economic development. However, behind this there is a problem that can not be ignored, that is, the protection of intellectual property rights is urgent. There are a large number of intellectual property infringement incidents in our country every year, only through judicial protection is not enough. Especially in our country, the perfect legal system to promote the administrative protection of intellectual property can greatly protect intellectual property from illegal infringement and promote the development of intellectual property. This paper begins with the concept of administrative protection of intellectual property, expounds the important significance of administrative protection of intellectual property, and analyzes the relevant laws and regulations of intellectual property and the present situation of administrative protection in China. This paper expounds the basic situation of administrative protection of intellectual property in our country, analyzes the problems existing in the administrative protection of intellectual property in our country from five aspects: organization, legislation, law enforcement, administrative protection and judicial protection, using the method of data analysis. This paper analyzes the experience of administrative protection of intellectual property rights in foreign regions and draws lessons from it, and puts forward more reasonable solutions to the problems existing in administrative protection of intellectual property rights in China. Through the integration of administrative protection institutions for intellectual property rights, the establishment of a unified and efficient administrative body, the training of high-quality intellectual property administrative personnel to strengthen the capacity of intellectual property rights judicial protection, and improve the legal system of intellectual property administrative protection, To stipulate the legal responsibility of the subject of administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights, to perfect the system of administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights, to put an end to "punishment instead of punishment" by transferring cases according to law, to establish perfect rules for the conversion of evidence, and to establish a system of professional appraisal of intellectual property, Strengthen the link between the administrative protection of intellectual property and judicial protection, strictly follow the basic principles of administrative procedures, ensure procedural justice, avoid abuse of administrative power, harm the interests of the parties concerned.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 聶洪濤;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)的發(fā)展趨勢及我國相關(guān)制度的完善[J];江西社會科學(xué);2014年05期

2 孫益武;;WTO視角下中國(上海)自由貿(mào)易試驗(yàn)區(qū)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)問題探析[J];上海對外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

3 張林鋒;修紅義;;印度知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度淺析及啟示[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2011年12期

4 陳棟;;淺談知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的行政保護(hù)[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年15期

5 曲三強(qiáng);張洪波;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)研究[J];政法論叢;2011年03期

6 戴琳;;論我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)及行政管理機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2010年06期

7 武善學(xué);;健全中國特色知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政管理和執(zhí)法體制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年04期

8 李升元;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)方式與程序研究[J];科技與法律;2010年01期

9 鄒寶珍;;論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政執(zhí)法體制改革——美國《優(yōu)化知識產(chǎn)權(quán)資源與組織法案》啟示[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

10 李泰山;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度存續(xù)的必要性[J];蘇州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

，

本文編號：2191823