【摘要】：十八大報告明確提出了創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略，指出科技創(chuàng)新是提高社會生產(chǎn)力和綜合國力的戰(zhàn)略支撐，必須擺在國家發(fā)展全局的核心位置。我國在堅持走中國特色的自主創(chuàng)新道路上，受創(chuàng)新資源、創(chuàng)新能力等的約束，集成創(chuàng)新、協(xié)同創(chuàng)新等合作創(chuàng)新的方式成為多數(shù)企業(yè)進行科技創(chuàng)新的選擇。創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟作為一種新的組織形式，在全國迅猛發(fā)展。 本文以創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟為研究對象，系統(tǒng)闡述了創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險、契約控制及快速信任的相關(guān)研究，并深入分析了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成績效的影響，，以及契約控制和快速信任在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險和創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成績效關(guān)系中的調(diào)節(jié)作用，進而提出了結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型及六大假設(shè)。并通過問卷調(diào)g男問絞占藎鈧趙擻肧PSS17.0和LISREL8.70統(tǒng)計分析軟件，對數(shù)據(jù)進行實證分析并檢驗理論模型，驗證相關(guān)理論假設(shè)。 研究結(jié)果表明： 一是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成績效存在負相關(guān)影響。由于創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)共享的要求與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)自身屬性之間的矛盾，決定了聯(lián)盟成員之間的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)利益沖突，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險一旦產(chǎn)生就會給產(chǎn)權(quán)所有者帶來損失巨大。 二是契約控制對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險與創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成質(zhì)量的關(guān)系存在負向調(diào)節(jié)作用，而在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險與創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成效率的關(guān)系中并未產(chǎn)生明顯的調(diào)節(jié)作用。通過契約控制，創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟成員能夠明確地規(guī)定合作各方的彼此的責(zé)任和義務(wù)，同時也提出了對方實施破壞創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成的行為時保護自身利益的權(quán)力，因此有利于降低知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成質(zhì)量的負向影響。于此同時由于制定詳盡合理的契約需要耗費大量的時間精力，因此導(dǎo)致契約控制對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成效率的關(guān)系并未產(chǎn)生調(diào)節(jié)作用。 三是快速信任對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險與創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成質(zhì)量的關(guān)系存在明顯的負向調(diào)節(jié)作用，并且對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險與創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成效率的關(guān)系也存在明顯的負向調(diào)節(jié)作用。高水平的快速信任可以使聯(lián)盟成員之間共享彼此技術(shù)和知識，降低投入猶豫和投入不完全等現(xiàn)象發(fā)生的概率，從而降低了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成效率的負向影響作用。另外，快速信任會增加聯(lián)盟成員的合作意愿，減少機會主義行為的發(fā)生，從而也降低了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險對創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟形成質(zhì)量的負向影響作用。
[Abstract]:The report of the 18th National Congress of the CPC put forward the strategy of innovation-driven development, and pointed out that scientific and technological innovation is the strategic support for improving social productivity and comprehensive national strength, and must be placed at the core of the overall situation of national development. On the road of independent innovation with Chinese characteristics, our country is constrained by innovation resources and innovation ability, and the cooperative innovation means such as integrated innovation and collaborative innovation have become the choice for most enterprises to carry out scientific and technological innovation. Innovation alliance as a new form of organization, in the rapid development of the country. This paper takes the innovation alliance as the research object, systematically expounds the intellectual property rights risk, the contract control and the fast trust in the innovation alliance, and deeply analyzes the influence of the intellectual property right risk on the innovation alliance formation performance. And the regulatory role of contract control and fast trust in the relationship between intellectual property risk and innovation alliance formation performance, and then put forward the structural equation model and six hypotheses. And through the questionnaire? Male? Jin? The statistical analysis software of PSS17.0 and LISREL8.70 is used to analyze the data and test the theoretical model to verify the relevant theoretical hypotheses. The results show that: first, intellectual property risk has a negative impact on innovation alliance formation performance. Because of the contradiction between the requirement of intellectual property sharing and the property of intellectual property in innovation alliance, the conflict of intellectual property interests among the members of the alliance is determined. Once intellectual property risk comes into being, it will bring huge losses to the owners of property rights. Second, contract control has a negative effect on the relationship between intellectual property risk and the quality of innovation alliance, but it does not play a significant role in the relationship between intellectual property risk and innovation alliance formation efficiency. Through contract control, the members of the innovation alliance can clearly define the responsibilities and obligations of each other, and at the same time propose the right of the other party to protect their own interests when carrying out the behavior of destroying the innovation alliance. Therefore, it is beneficial to reduce the negative impact of intellectual property risk on the quality of innovation alliance. At the same time, it takes a lot of time and energy to make a detailed and reasonable contract, so contract control does not regulate the relationship between intellectual property risk and the efficiency of innovation alliance. Thirdly, the relationship between intellectual property risk and the quality of innovation alliance is significantly regulated by the rapid trust, and the relationship between the intellectual property risk and the efficiency of innovation alliance is also negatively regulated. The high level of fast trust can make the members of the alliance share each other's technology and knowledge, reduce the probability of indecision and incomplete investment, and reduce the negative effect of intellectual property risk on the efficiency of innovation alliance. In addition, fast trust will increase the alliance members' willingness to cooperate, reduce the occurrence of opportunistic behavior, and thus reduce the negative impact of intellectual property risk on the quality of innovation alliance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F273.1;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇世彬;黃瑞華;;合作創(chuàng)新隱性知識轉(zhuǎn)移中風(fēng)險影響因素分析[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

2 楊志蓉;謝章澍;寶貢敏;;團隊快速信任、互動行為對團隊創(chuàng)造力的作用機理研究[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

3 謝恩;蘇中鋒;李垣;;基于聯(lián)盟風(fēng)險的戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟控制方式選擇[J];管理工程學(xué)報;2009年03期

4 秦開銀;杜榮;李燕;;臨時團隊中知識共享對快速信任與績效關(guān)系的調(diào)節(jié)作用研究[J];管理學(xué)報;2010年01期

5 龔曉瑾;;試析中小企業(yè)技術(shù)聯(lián)盟的生命周期特征[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年12期

6 王惠東;祁紅梅;惠靜薇;;團隊快速信任理論研究現(xiàn)狀及展望[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年01期

7 楚銀;倪文斌;;臨時團隊快速信任影響因素研究述評[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年23期

8 鄧靈斌;;企業(yè)隱性知識轉(zhuǎn)移中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險及其規(guī)避研究[J];科技進步與對策;2009年04期

9 閆威;陳燕;陳林波;;動態(tài)聯(lián)盟知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險評價的理論分析與案例研究[J];科技進步與對策;2009年15期

10 蘇世彬;黃瑞華;;合作創(chuàng)新中隱性知識轉(zhuǎn)移引發(fā)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險及其防范對策研究[J];科技進步與對策;2009年17期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊志蓉;團隊快速信任、互動行為與團隊創(chuàng)造力研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫中國;企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟成員滿意研究[D];哈爾濱理工大學(xué);2009年

本文編號：2187085