【摘要】：計算機軟件的知識產權保護是人們討論的熱點,同時也是個難點,對此問題學術界有不同觀點,世界各國有不同的做法。目前世界上流行的做法是將軟件視為作品給予版權保護,然而軟件畢竟不同于傳統文學作品,在大多數情況下它是作為一種工具而存在,因此給予計算機軟件以專利保護便成為討論的熱門話題。 本文分為四個部分,旨在通過分析計算機軟件自身的特點,論證其可專利性。第一部分首先介紹了計算機軟件的概念和特點,然后介紹了歐洲和美國對于計算機軟件的專利保護以及對于我國的啟示。第二部分從計算機軟件的工具性角度出發(fā),認為首先軟件本身可以成為一種技術方案,其次軟件不同于數學公式和思維方法,不屬于智力活動的規(guī)則和方法,應當能夠成為專利法所保護的對象。第三部分意在討論軟件專利的審查標準與普通專利相比有何不同,就實用性、新穎性和創(chuàng)造性分別展開論述,思考其實質性授權條件。大多數軟件都具有實用性,判斷新穎性的關鍵在于如何認定現有技術以及相應數據庫的建立,而創(chuàng)造性成為軟件取得專利的最后門檻。第四部分就如何完善我國專利法關于計算機軟件的保護提出了幾點建議,認為首先應當承認軟件本身是專利法所保護的客體,其次在此基礎上采取寬進嚴出的審查策略以控制軟件專利的數量,同時縮短軟件專利的審查期限和保護期限,再次為了使軟件本身能夠申請產品發(fā)明專利還需要擴大產品這一概念在專利法下的含義,最后建議申請專利時要求開發(fā)者公開源代碼。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection of computer software is not only a hot topic but also a difficult one. There are different viewpoints in academic circles and different ways in the world. The prevailing practice in the world at present is to treat software as a work that gives copyright protection, but software is, after all, different from traditional literature, and in most cases it exists as a tool. Therefore, giving computer software patent protection has become a hot topic of discussion. This paper is divided into four parts, aiming to prove the patentability of computer software by analyzing its own characteristics. The first part introduces the concept and characteristics of computer software, and then introduces the patent protection of computer software in Europe and America and the enlightenment to our country. In the second part, from the perspective of the instrumentality of computer software, it is considered that, firstly, software itself can become a technical scheme, and secondly, the software is different from mathematical formulas and thinking methods and does not belong to the rules and methods of intellectual activities. It should be able to be protected by patent law. The third part is to discuss the difference between the examination standard of software patent and that of common patent, discuss the practicability, novelty and creativity respectively, and think about the substantive authorization condition of software patent. Most software are practical, the key to judge novelty lies in how to identify the existing technology and the establishment of the corresponding database, and creativity becomes the final threshold of software patent. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the protection of computer software in the patent law of our country, and thinks that the software itself should be recognized as the object protected by the patent law. Secondly, on the basis of this, we adopt a wide and strict examination strategy in order to control the number of software patents, and at the same time shorten the period of examination and protection of software patents. Thirdly, in order to make the software itself able to apply for product invention patent, it is necessary to expand the meaning of the concept of product under patent law. Finally, it is suggested that the developer be required to open the source code when applying for patent.
【學位授予單位】：內蒙古大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 牟新華,王明潔;對計算機軟件實施專利保護的可行性[J];當代法學;2000年03期

2 馬治國,孫可舟;計算機軟件的專門立法保護研究[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1999年06期

3 樸京順;;如何加強我國計算機軟件專利安全的保護措施[J];計算機安全;2011年07期

4 余翔,劉珊;美國計算機軟件相關發(fā)明的專利保護及其與歐盟的比較[J];電子知識產權;2005年10期

5 樸京順;;我國計算機軟件專利保護制度的問題研究[J];電子知識產權;2011年08期

6 余翔;劉珊;;美國、歐盟計算機軟件相關發(fā)明的專利保護比較研究[J];管理學報;2006年01期

7 方X;王展;;削足適履抑或易履適足——計算機軟件可專利性之邏輯求證[J];公民與法(法學版);2009年09期

8 馬毓昭;楊中亮;宗磊;池芳;;蘋果與三星專利戰(zhàn)對我國人機交互技術專利布局的啟示[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2013年02期

9 劉娟;佟曉慧;肖霞;;計算機軟件的可專利性淺談[J];電子制作;2013年14期

10 滕少凱;;對計算機程序專利保護的思考[J];邊疆經濟與文化;2012年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 練劍波;計算機程序專利客體審查標準研究[D];華東政法大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2149824