【摘要】：佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)歷史悠久，經(jīng)過多年發(fā)展，尤其是改革開放后的強(qiáng)勢崛起，現(xiàn)佛山已成為全國乃至全球最大的陶瓷生產(chǎn)基地，“佛山陶瓷”享譽(yù)海內(nèi)外，并于2013年獲國家工商總局批準(zhǔn)成為集體商標(biāo)。同年，3月26日國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局、工業(yè)和信息化部、工商總局、版權(quán)局四部委下發(fā)《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)工作的意見》，該意見將陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)工作提到新的高度。 在國家出臺意見加強(qiáng)陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的新形勢下，審視佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)會發(fā)現(xiàn)佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律保護(hù)面臨存在大量著作權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)、專利權(quán)的侵權(quán)行為和地理標(biāo)志保護(hù)不力的問題。在我國雙軌制的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)模式下，表現(xiàn)出行政保護(hù)機(jī)制不暢，，司法保護(hù)作用受限，行業(yè)協(xié)會作用有限的問題。此外，佛山陶瓷行業(yè)還存在對佛山陶瓷文化遺產(chǎn)的保護(hù)認(rèn)識不足，對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中環(huán)境保護(hù)關(guān)系缺乏清晰的認(rèn)識的問題。 本文在對上述佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)工作的基本情況進(jìn)行研究的基礎(chǔ)上，分析了存在的問題及原因，提出利用現(xiàn)有法律保護(hù)佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，進(jìn)一步完善佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律保護(hù)機(jī)制，注重和推進(jìn)佛山陶瓷文化遺產(chǎn)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、實(shí)現(xiàn)陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與環(huán)境保護(hù)的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一等方面入手加強(qiáng)佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的對策和建議。
[Abstract]:Foshan ceramic industry has a long history, after years of development, especially after the strong rise of reform and opening up, now Foshan has become the largest ceramic production base in the country and even the world, "Foshan Ceramics" is well known at home and abroad. And in 2013 by the State Administration of Industry and Commerce approved to become a collective trademark. The same year, 26 March, State intellectual property Office, Ministry of Industry and Information, General Administration of Industry and Commerce, Opinions on strengthening the Protection of intellectual property Rights of Ceramic Industry were issued by four ministries and commissions of copyright Bureau, which raised the protection of intellectual property rights of ceramic industry to a new height. Under the new situation of the state's opinions on strengthening the protection of the intellectual property rights of the ceramic industry, a review of the protection of the intellectual property rights of the Foshan ceramic industry will find that there are a large number of copyright and trademark rights in the legal protection of the intellectual property rights of the Foshan ceramics industry. Infringement of patent rights and inadequate protection of geographical indications. Under the dual track system of intellectual property protection in our country, the administrative protection mechanism is not smooth, the judicial protection function is limited, and the role of trade associations is limited. In addition, Foshan ceramic industry still has insufficient understanding of the protection of Foshan ceramic cultural heritage and lack of clear understanding of the relationship between environmental protection and intellectual property protection. On the basis of studying the basic situation of the intellectual property work of Foshan ceramics industry, this paper analyzes the existing problems and causes, and puts forward that the existing laws should be used to protect the intellectual property rights of Foshan ceramics industry. To further improve the legal protection mechanism for the intellectual property rights of the Foshan ceramics industry, and to pay attention to and promote the protection of intellectual property rights of the Foshan ceramic cultural heritage, The countermeasures and suggestions to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights in Foshan ceramics industry are put forward in order to realize the organic unification of intellectual property protection and environmental protection in ceramic industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧忠華;;行業(yè)協(xié)會在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中的地位[J];中華商標(biāo);2007年04期

2 左偉;周錦源;;“雙轉(zhuǎn)移”策略下佛山陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)狀與對策研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年16期

3 周文亮;;佛山陶瓷業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的動力分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年07期

4 廖竹軒;佛山陶瓷業(yè)侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象的分析及法律對策[J];佛山陶瓷;2002年03期

5 胡充寒;王燕玲;;論廣東陶瓷行業(yè)的原產(chǎn)地名稱保護(hù)[J];佛山陶瓷;2008年01期

6 胡充寒;陳笑塵;;佛山陶瓷行業(yè)的商標(biāo)權(quán)法律保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];佛山陶瓷;2008年05期

7 向玉蘭;;運(yùn)用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度 促進(jìn)佛山建筑衛(wèi)生陶瓷持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];佛山陶瓷;2008年06期

8 劉世明;陳磊;;談佛山陶瓷出口TBT現(xiàn)狀及應(yīng)對策略[J];佛山陶瓷;2009年01期

9 李松志;范建紅;張曉明;;佛山禪城陶瓷產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移空間地域模式實(shí)證研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年11期

10 鄧燕寧;;佛山陶瓷文化遺產(chǎn)概述[J];佛山陶瓷;2010年06期

本文編號：2143132