【摘要】：懲罰性賠償制度自其從英國發(fā)源之后便在其應(yīng)該如何適用以及適用范圍上飽受爭議，但是懲罰性賠償制度之所以能夠存在至今天，并且在爭議中得以長足發(fā)展是有其原因的。其不僅能夠彌補(bǔ)單一的補(bǔ)償性民事責(zé)任的不足，滿足社會日益發(fā)展的需要，其更能在一定程度上契合私法的發(fā)展趨勢，建立起法律防護(hù)的堡壘。雖然懲罰性賠償制度在英美法系的適用要比在大陸法系的適用廣泛，但是從目前的趨勢來看，大陸法系國家對于懲罰性賠償制度的適用呈現(xiàn)出擴(kuò)大的趨勢。我國針對懲罰性賠償制度所持的態(tài)度是較為謹(jǐn)慎的，但是隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會的不斷發(fā)展，特別是中國在經(jīng)歷了30年的經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展期之后，社會上的一些問題凸顯，而隨著社會的不斷發(fā)展，法律在懲罰性賠償制度方面所表現(xiàn)出來的滯后性也日益嚴(yán)重。本文試圖分析現(xiàn)行法中懲罰性賠償制度在適用范圍上所存在的不足，在對擴(kuò)大懲罰性賠償制度的適用范圍的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行邏輯論證之后，提出究竟該在哪些方面來擴(kuò)大懲罰性賠償制度的適用。 論文除了引言和結(jié)論之外，總共分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分，論述了懲罰性賠償制度適用范圍狹窄所存在的弊端。首先是對現(xiàn)如今我國在懲罰性賠償制度方面立法上的列舉。通過對一系列現(xiàn)行法的分析，得出懲罰性賠償制度在我國的適用上是持著較為謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度的，而這種謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度是不能夠充分發(fā)揮懲罰性賠償制度其應(yīng)有的作用的。其次是對這種謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度的分析，并通過分析得出這種謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度在現(xiàn)如今的社會是不利于懲罰性賠償制度的發(fā)展和整個(gè)法律體系的完善的，而且這種謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度使得許許多多的違法現(xiàn)象層出不窮。 第二部分，論述了懲罰性賠償制度適用范圍擴(kuò)大的正當(dāng)性。首先是對懲罰性賠償制度的損害填補(bǔ)功能的分析，，論證了若想擴(kuò)大懲罰性賠償制度的適用范圍，就要以懲罰性賠償制度的損害填補(bǔ)功能作為邏輯前提；其次，通過對外國法的借鑒以及法律全球化的趨勢來說明懲罰性賠償制度在我國擴(kuò)大適用的必要性。 第三部分，介紹了懲罰性賠償制度擴(kuò)大適用的新領(lǐng)域。這一部分是筆者對懲罰性賠償制度如何擴(kuò)大適用的構(gòu)想，除了在現(xiàn)行法的既有領(lǐng)域要擴(kuò)大懲罰性賠償制度的適用范圍，在一些新的領(lǐng)域如現(xiàn)代化通訊工具大規(guī)模侵權(quán)案件中、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件中、侵犯商業(yè)秘密案件中、環(huán)境侵權(quán)案件中引入懲罰性賠償制度，從而使懲罰性賠償制度在法律所調(diào)整范圍內(nèi)的大部分領(lǐng)域都能夠得以適用。
[Abstract]:The system of punitive damages has been controversial since it originated from Britain. However, the system of punitive damages has existed to this day and developed rapidly in the controversy. It can not only make up for the deficiency of the single compensatory civil liability and meet the needs of the society's development day by day, but also be able to conform to the development trend of private law to a certain extent, and build up the fortress of legal protection. Although the application of punitive damages in the common law system is wider than that in the civil law system, but from the current trend, the application of the punitive damages system in the countries of the civil law system shows a trend of expansion. Our attitude towards punitive damages system is more cautious, but with the development of economy and society, especially after 30 years of rapid economic development in China, some social problems have been highlighted. With the development of society, the lag of the law in punitive damages is becoming more and more serious. This paper attempts to analyze the shortcomings of the punitive damages system in the current law, after the logical argumentation on the legitimacy of expanding the scope of application of the punitive damages system, The author puts forward what aspects should be applied to expand the application of punitive damages system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the thesis is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the disadvantages of the punitive damages system in its narrow scope of application. First of all, it lists the legislation of punitive damages in our country. Based on the analysis of a series of existing laws, it is concluded that the application of punitive damages system in our country is more cautious attitude, and this prudent attitude can not give full play to the role of punitive damages system. Secondly, the analysis of this cautious attitude, and through the analysis of this cautious attitude in today's society is not conducive to the development of punitive damages system and the improvement of the entire legal system. And this cautious attitude has led to numerous violations of the law. The second part discusses the legitimacy of the expansion of the scope of application of punitive damages system. First of all, it analyzes the damage filling function of punitive damages system, and proves that if we want to expand the scope of application of punitive damages system, we should take the damage compensation function of punitive damages system as the logical premise. Through the reference of foreign law and the trend of legal globalization, the necessity of expanding the application of punitive damages system in China is explained. The third part, introduced the punitive damages system to expand the application of new areas. This part is the author's idea of how to expand the application of punitive damages system, in addition to the existing areas of current law to expand the scope of application of punitive damages system, in some new areas such as modern communication tools of mass infringement cases, In intellectual property rights cases, trade secrets infringement cases and environmental infringement cases, the punitive damages system is introduced, so that the punitive damages system can be applied in most areas regulated by the law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;美國懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 董春華;;各國有關(guān)懲罰性賠償制度的比較研究[J];東方論壇;2008年01期

3 許明月;普遍性侵權(quán)、機(jī)會主義與侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象的法律控制——對傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)法的反思[J];法商研究;2005年04期

4 葉秋華;劉海鷗;;論古代羅馬侵權(quán)行為法的發(fā)展演變[J];法學(xué)家;2006年06期

5 張馳,韓強(qiáng);民法同質(zhì)補(bǔ)償原則新思考[J];法學(xué);2000年03期

6 王立峰;關(guān)于懲罰性賠償?shù)囊恍┧伎肌媾c《民法同質(zhì)補(bǔ)償原則新思考》一文作者商榷[J];法學(xué);2000年06期

7 馬新彥;鄧冰寧;;論懲罰性賠償?shù)膿p害填補(bǔ)功能——以美國侵權(quán)法懲罰性賠償制度為啟示的研究[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

8 馬新彥;;內(nèi)幕交易懲罰性賠償制度的構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年06期

9 張新寶;李倩;;懲罰性賠償?shù)牧⒎ㄟx擇[J];清華法學(xué);2009年04期

10 馬新彥;鄧冰寧;;現(xiàn)代化通信工具大規(guī)模侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償制度構(gòu)建[J];求是學(xué)刊;2013年01期

本文編號：2132923