本文選題：文化 + 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)��； 參考：《大連理工大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟和科學(xué)技術(shù)的迅猛發(fā)展,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在國際競爭中的作用日漸凸顯。作為文化的重要組成部分,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化是由有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的價值觀念、道德規(guī)范、法律法規(guī)、服務(wù)和管理體系及行為方式等構(gòu)成的有機整體,包括知識產(chǎn)權(quán)觀念文化、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度文化、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)物態(tài)文化和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為文化四方面內(nèi)容,具有激發(fā)創(chuàng)新意識、營造創(chuàng)新氛圍、激勵創(chuàng)新發(fā)展等價值。 自2003年世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織首次提出“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化”概念后,國內(nèi)學(xué)界開始了關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化的相關(guān)研究。2007年10月,黨的十七大提出“提升國家文化軟實力”的戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)想。2008年6月,國務(wù)院頒布的《國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略綱要》中將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育列為國家戰(zhàn)略,為我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育提供了重要的政策依據(jù)。因此,本選題的研究,對于踐行社會主義核心價值體系,營造創(chuàng)新氛圍,促進科技發(fā)展,提升國家文化軟實力具有理論和現(xiàn)實意義。 本文采用文獻研究、實證研究、比較研究等研究方法,以國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局兩次全國性調(diào)查結(jié)果為主要分析樣本,突破以往研究中多以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)代替知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化的思維局限,注重“文化”的語義表現(xiàn)以及“培育”的目標(biāo)指向,對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育進行了較為全面系統(tǒng)的研究。論文詳細(xì)介紹了文化、傳統(tǒng)文化、現(xiàn)代文化、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)、文化軟實力和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化等基本概念,闡釋了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化的特征、價值和內(nèi)容構(gòu)成等基本范疇；以馬克思主義文化理論為指導(dǎo),借鑒中華傳統(tǒng)文化的優(yōu)秀思想,依據(jù)我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的相關(guān)政策,立足我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的現(xiàn)狀,客觀分析取得的成就,剖析存在的問題及其成因；從歷程、基本模式、啟示等方面全面考察了美、日、韓、德等國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的實踐,提煉出美國四載體多向互動、日本三主體參與教育、韓國五計劃戰(zhàn)略主導(dǎo)、德國兩維度協(xié)同發(fā)展等國外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的基本模式；在確立我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的原則方針及目標(biāo)基礎(chǔ)上,提出注重觀念培養(yǎng)、完善制度建設(shè)、夯實物態(tài)基礎(chǔ)、加強行為引導(dǎo)等推進我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化培育的對策思考。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and science and technology, the role of intellectual property rights in international competition is becoming increasingly prominent. As an important part of culture, intellectual property culture is an organic whole composed of intellectual property values, ethics, laws and regulations, service and management system and behavior. Intellectual property system culture, intellectual property material culture and intellectual property behavior culture have the value of stimulating innovation consciousness, creating innovation atmosphere and encouraging innovation development. Since the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO) first introduced the concept of "intellectual property culture" in 2003, scholars in China have begun to study the culture of intellectual property. The Seventeenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the strategic idea of "enhancing the soft power of national culture." in June 2008, the State Council promulgated the outline of the National intellectual property Strategy, which included the cultivation of intellectual property culture as a national strategy. It provides an important policy basis for the cultivation of intellectual property culture in China. Therefore, the study of this topic has theoretical and practical significance for practicing the socialist core value system, creating an innovative atmosphere, promoting the development of science and technology, and promoting the soft power of national culture. In this paper, literature research, empirical research, comparative research and other research methods are used to analyze the results of two national surveys of the State intellectual property Office as the main analysis samples, breaking through the limitations of thinking that intellectual property rights replace intellectual property culture in previous studies. Focusing on the semantic expression of "culture" and the goal of "cultivation", this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic study on the cultivation of intellectual property culture in China. The basic concepts of culture, traditional culture, modern culture, intellectual property rights, cultural soft power and intellectual property culture are introduced in detail. Under the guidance of Marxist cultural theory, drawing lessons from the excellent thoughts of Chinese traditional culture, according to the relevant policies of intellectual property culture cultivation in China, based on the current situation of intellectual property culture cultivation in China, the paper objectively analyzes the achievements made. By analyzing the existing problems and their causes, examining the practice of cultivating intellectual property culture in the United States, Japan, South Korea and Germany from the aspects of history, basic mode and enlightenment, the author abstracts the four carriers of the United States and the three main bodies of Japan to participate in education. The basic mode of foreign intellectual property culture cultivation, such as Korea's five plan strategy leading and Germany's two dimensions coordinated development, is put forward on the basis of establishing the principle, policy and goal of our country's intellectual property culture cultivation, putting forward paying attention to the concept cultivation, perfecting the system construction, and so on. The countermeasures to promote the cultivation of intellectual property culture in China are to consolidate the material state foundation and strengthen the behavior guidance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F204

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭成思;中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的建立與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護現(xiàn)狀[J];中華商標(biāo);2005年04期

2 龔志軍;楊崢嶸;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護中的企業(yè)主體作用[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年12期

3 汪福田;加強產(chǎn)學(xué)研聯(lián)合 加快科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化 加速構(gòu)建區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新體系[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2005年03期

4 李艷;;文化自覺的三重釋義[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期

5 吳漢東;;設(shè)計未來:中國發(fā)展與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2011年04期

6 劉華;;文化 決定性力量——知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化探析[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2007年04期

7 吳漢東;;利弊之間:知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的政策科學(xué)分析[J];法商研究;2006年05期

8 蘇平;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)變動模式研究[J];法商研究;2011年02期

9 陳體滇;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)實行黃金分配原則[J];發(fā)展研究;2006年03期

10 金明浩;袁偉;;高�？萍紕�(chuàng)新中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化生態(tài)環(huán)境[J];高等工程教育研究;2009年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡神松;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)教育與文化戰(zhàn)略研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2117926