本文選題：轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任 + 幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任　； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著我國經(jīng)濟與科技的快速發(fā)展，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)行為方式變得愈發(fā)多樣化，所產(chǎn)生的損害結(jié)果也日趨嚴重，，無論是在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)理論界還是具體的司法實踐中，間接責(zé)任法律制度建構(gòu)的重要性日益體現(xiàn)，但我國關(guān)注及研究的重點傾向于幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度，從而忽略了對版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的探究。不僅在立法上未能建立轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任體制，還對該體制下的某些基本問題認識不一。然而，我國設(shè)立版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度是具有現(xiàn)實必要性的，同時需盡快予以建構(gòu)，以彌補現(xiàn)有間接責(zé)任體制的不足。 本文希望通過對版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任基本問題進行研究分析，從而最終提出自己的建構(gòu)建議。 第一部分從版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任的基本理論問題入手，簡要介紹了轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的民法傳統(tǒng)與歸責(zé)原則的發(fā)展，初步概括與分析了版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任下監(jiān)督控制權(quán)利與能力以及直接經(jīng)濟利益獲得兩要件的基本內(nèi)涵，并探討了轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的法理基礎(chǔ)及影響因素問題，為整篇文章作以理論的鋪墊與引導(dǎo)。 第二部分試圖通過研究國外的立法例，尤其是美國的司法實踐，從國外版權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任的發(fā)展軌跡中借鑒學(xué)習(xí)。 第三部分則詳細敘述了三大典型主體模式下轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任兩要件的適用情況，并較之以幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任的對比分析，體現(xiàn)出轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的特色與制度價值。 第四部分進行全面的歸納總結(jié)，不僅歸納了轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的局限性，最重要的是分析了我國現(xiàn)有轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任制度的不足與缺陷，從而提出了建構(gòu)的建議意義。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and science and technology in our country, the ways of intellectual property infringement have become more and more diversified, and the resulting damage has become more and more serious, whether in the intellectual property theory or in the specific judicial practice. The importance of the construction of the legal system of indirect liability is increasingly reflected, but the focus of our attention and research tends to help the tort liability system, thus neglecting the exploration of the system of copyright transfer liability. Not only has the legislation failed to establish the system of transfer responsibility, but also some basic problems under the system are not well understood. However, it is necessary to set up the system of transfer liability of copyright in our country. At the same time, it is necessary to construct it as soon as possible in order to make up for the deficiency of the existing system of indirect liability. This paper hopes to research and analyze the basic problems of copyright transfer liability, and finally put forward its own constructive suggestions. The first part introduces the development of the tradition of civil law and the principle of imputation. This paper summarizes and analyzes the basic connotations of the right and ability of supervision and control and the acquisition of direct economic interests under the responsibility of copyright transfer, and probes into the legal basis and influencing factors of the system of transfer of copyright. For the entire article to prepare and guide the theory. The second part attempts to learn from the development of foreign copyright transfer liability through the study of foreign legislative cases, especially the judicial practice of the United States. The third part describes in detail the application of the two elements of transfer liability under the model of three typical subjects, and compared with the comparative analysis of helping tort liability, it reflects the characteristics and system value of the transfer liability system. The fourth part makes a comprehensive summary, not only summarizes the limitations of the system of transfer responsibility, but also analyzes the shortcomings and defects of the existing system of transfer responsibility in China, and puts forward the constructive significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊署東;;轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則的復(fù)合性和構(gòu)成要件的二重性[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 楊署東;;轉(zhuǎn)承責(zé)任基本理論問題新探[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

3 徐楷行;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];常熟理工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

4 劉家瑞;論新興文件共享技術(shù)的版權(quán)間接責(zé)任(上)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年08期

5 劉家瑞;論中國版權(quán)間接責(zé)任制度的建立——兼論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任制度的完善[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年11期

6 王遷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題再研究[J];法商研究;2010年01期

7 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

8 燕敏;;美國版權(quán)間接責(zé)任的經(jīng)濟分析[J];法制與社會;2006年21期

9 甘露;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的類型化[J];法制與社會;2010年17期

10 雷艷珍;;信息存儲空間提供者的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任——以“土豆案”為視角[J];法治研究;2009年02期

本文編號：2102253