本文選題：兼容性 + 技術(shù)保護(hù)措施�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：科學(xué)技術(shù)帶領(lǐng)人類走進(jìn)數(shù)字信息時代，在新的數(shù)字環(huán)境中，技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的運用使得版權(quán)人的合法權(quán)益得到了有效的維護(hù)，但是版權(quán)人以技術(shù)措施受法律保護(hù)為借口，利用技術(shù)措施形成限制競爭、捆綁銷售等技術(shù)措施濫用的問題，成為法律保護(hù)領(lǐng)域的新難題。由于保護(hù)產(chǎn)品的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與實現(xiàn)信息共享所必要的兼容性之間存在矛盾，如何平衡權(quán)利人與社會公眾之間的利益值得關(guān)注。為了實現(xiàn)兼容性的目的，很多國家都在版權(quán)法的框架內(nèi)建立了不同的應(yīng)對方式。本文重點關(guān)注了幾個典型國家的立法、司法實踐，通過對它們的比較研究，結(jié)合我國立法缺失的現(xiàn)狀，在兼容性的價值越發(fā)凸顯的背景下，為完善我國技術(shù)措施保護(hù)的兼容性例外制度提供借鑒，以促進(jìn)兼容性，從而推動技術(shù)創(chuàng)新，實現(xiàn)其價值的最大化。本文一共分為四部分。第一部分是關(guān)于技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的兼容性例外制度的概述。首先從技術(shù)層面、法律法規(guī)界定等角度，具體介紹了兼容性的定義及相關(guān)概念，然后論述了在數(shù)字時代中，兼容性價值的體現(xiàn)。第二部分具體論述了技術(shù)保護(hù)措施對兼容性限制的主要體現(xiàn)。分別從鎖定消費者，破壞反向工程合法性，壟斷配件產(chǎn)品的售后市場的角度進(jìn)行了分析。第三部分比較研究了技術(shù)措施保護(hù)的兼容性例外制度的國際立法，包括美國《數(shù)字千年版權(quán)法》（DMCA）、《歐洲版權(quán)指令》（EUCD）、法國DADVSI法、加拿大《版權(quán)現(xiàn)代化法案》、澳大利亞《2006年版權(quán)修正法》。第四部分具有現(xiàn)實意義。首先回顧了我國技術(shù)措施法律保護(hù)制度的立法進(jìn)程，，分析了我國現(xiàn)有立法的現(xiàn)狀，表明了我國兼容性例外制度的立法缺失。最后一部分，筆者在結(jié)合我國當(dāng)前的具體國情的基礎(chǔ)上，汲取國外先進(jìn)的立法經(jīng)驗，進(jìn)一步提出了我國技術(shù)措施保護(hù)的兼容性例外制度具體設(shè)計方面的建設(shè)性意見。從確立基本原則入手，制定詳細(xì)的兼容性規(guī)避例外需要滿足的具體條件，在此基礎(chǔ)上授權(quán)特定機(jī)構(gòu)適用更新機(jī)制，定期對此制度進(jìn)行審視與調(diào)整，同時設(shè)置監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)，配合適當(dāng)?shù)木葷?jì)手段，最終形成更加科學(xué)合理的制度設(shè)計。
[Abstract]:Science and technology lead mankind into the era of digital information. In the new digital environment, the use of technical protection measures makes the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owners effectively maintained, but the copyright owners take the technical measures as an excuse for the use of technical measures to form restrictions on competition, binding sales and other technical measures abused. There is a new problem in the field of legal protection. Because there is a contradiction between the protection of the intellectual property rights of products and the compatibility of information sharing, it is worth paying attention to how to balance the interests between the right holder and the public. In order to achieve compatibility, many countries have set up different coping styles in the framework of copyright law. It pays more attention to the legislation and judicial practice of several typical countries, and through the comparative study of them, combined with the current situation of lack of legislation in our country and under the background of more and more compatible value, it provides a reference for improving the compatibility exception system of the protection of technical measures in our country, in order to promote compatibility, so as to promote technological innovation and realize its value most. This article is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the compatibility exception system of technical protection measures. First, it introduces the definition of compatibility and related concepts from the technical level and the definition of laws and regulations, and then discusses the embodiment of compatibility value in the digital age. The second part concretely discusses the technology. The protection measures are the main embodiment of the compatibility restrictions. From the angle of locking the consumers, destroying the legitimacy of the reverse engineering and monopolize the aftermarket of the accessories products, the third part compares the international legislation of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (DMCA) of the United States, and the European Copyright. Instruction > (EUCD), French DADVSI law, Canadian copyright Modernization Act, Australia's copyright amendment act in <2006 >. The fourth part is of practical significance. First, it reviews the legislative process of the legal protection system of our country's technical measures, analyzes the present situation of the existing legislation in our country, and shows the lack of legislation of our country's compatibility exception system. On the basis of the current specific national conditions of our country, the author draws on the advanced foreign legislative experience, and further puts forward constructive suggestions on the specific design of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures in China. At the same time, the special institutions are authorized to apply the renewal mechanism to examine and adjust the system regularly. At the same time, the supervision institutions are set up, and the appropriate relief means are set up to form a more scientific and reasonable system design.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 隴小渝;張芳;;兼容性對電信競爭的影響及對管制政策的啟示[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2008年02期

2 唐百川;胡漢輝;;軟件企業(yè)的產(chǎn)品兼容性決策選擇[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年S1期

3 陳飛;美國合理使用制度在反向工程中的運用——以Sony訴Connectix案為線索[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年06期

4 張晉靜;軟件反向工程合法性的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年07期

5 王遷;濫用"技術(shù)措施"的法律對策——評美國Skylink案及Static案[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年01期

6 任軍民;;法國數(shù)字信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)最新立法述評[J];法商研究;2006年06期

7 馮曉青;;技術(shù)措施與著作權(quán)保護(hù)探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期

8 李貝貝,黃鋒;信息技術(shù)的兼容性分析——以軟件業(yè)為例[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年07期

9 朱振中,呂廷杰;兼容性經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究的發(fā)展[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年09期

10 劉娜;周平;張順利;;云計算互操作性分類研究[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2012年Z1期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王東君;數(shù)字版權(quán)管理的法律限制問題研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：2090844