發(fā)布時間：2018-07-02 20:37

  本文選題：兼容性 + 技術保護措施　； 參考：《華南理工大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：科學技術帶領人類走進數(shù)字信息時代，在新的數(shù)字環(huán)境中，技術保護措施的運用使得版權人的合法權益得到了有效的維護，但是版權人以技術措施受法律保護為借口，利用技術措施形成限制競爭、捆綁銷售等技術措施濫用的問題，成為法律保護領域的新難題。由于保護產品的知識產權與實現(xiàn)信息共享所必要的兼容性之間存在矛盾，如何平衡權利人與社會公眾之間的利益值得關注。為了實現(xiàn)兼容性的目的，很多國家都在版權法的框架內建立了不同的應對方式。本文重點關注了幾個典型國家的立法、司法實踐，通過對它們的比較研究，結合我國立法缺失的現(xiàn)狀，在兼容性的價值越發(fā)凸顯的背景下，為完善我國技術措施保護的兼容性例外制度提供借鑒，以促進兼容性，從而推動技術創(chuàng)新，實現(xiàn)其價值的最大化。本文一共分為四部分。第一部分是關于技術保護措施的兼容性例外制度的概述。首先從技術層面、法律法規(guī)界定等角度，具體介紹了兼容性的定義及相關概念，然后論述了在數(shù)字時代中，兼容性價值的體現(xiàn)。第二部分具體論述了技術保護措施對兼容性限制的主要體現(xiàn)。分別從鎖定消費者，破壞反向工程合法性，壟斷配件產品的售后市場的角度進行了分析。第三部分比較研究了技術措施保護的兼容性例外制度的國際立法，包括美國《數(shù)字千年版權法》（DMCA）、《歐洲版權指令》（EUCD）、法國DADVSI法、加拿大《版權現(xiàn)代化法案》、澳大利亞《2006年版權修正法》。第四部分具有現(xiàn)實意義。首先回顧了我國技術措施法律保護制度的立法進程，，分析了我國現(xiàn)有立法的現(xiàn)狀，表明了我國兼容性例外制度的立法缺失。最后一部分，筆者在結合我國當前的具體國情的基礎上，汲取國外先進的立法經(jīng)驗，進一步提出了我國技術措施保護的兼容性例外制度具體設計方面的建設性意見。從確立基本原則入手，制定詳細的兼容性規(guī)避例外需要滿足的具體條件，在此基礎上授權特定機構適用更新機制，定期對此制度進行審視與調整，同時設置監(jiān)管機構，配合適當?shù)木葷侄�，最終形成更加科學合理的制度設計。
[Abstract]:Science and technology lead mankind into the era of digital information. In the new digital environment, the use of technical protection measures makes the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owners effectively maintained, but the copyright owners take the technical measures as an excuse for the use of technical measures to form restrictions on competition, binding sales and other technical measures abused. There is a new problem in the field of legal protection. Because there is a contradiction between the protection of the intellectual property rights of products and the compatibility of information sharing, it is worth paying attention to how to balance the interests between the right holder and the public. In order to achieve compatibility, many countries have set up different coping styles in the framework of copyright law. It pays more attention to the legislation and judicial practice of several typical countries, and through the comparative study of them, combined with the current situation of lack of legislation in our country and under the background of more and more compatible value, it provides a reference for improving the compatibility exception system of the protection of technical measures in our country, in order to promote compatibility, so as to promote technological innovation and realize its value most. This article is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the compatibility exception system of technical protection measures. First, it introduces the definition of compatibility and related concepts from the technical level and the definition of laws and regulations, and then discusses the embodiment of compatibility value in the digital age. The second part concretely discusses the technology. The protection measures are the main embodiment of the compatibility restrictions. From the angle of locking the consumers, destroying the legitimacy of the reverse engineering and monopolize the aftermarket of the accessories products, the third part compares the international legislation of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (DMCA) of the United States, and the European Copyright. Instruction > (EUCD), French DADVSI law, Canadian copyright Modernization Act, Australia's copyright amendment act in <2006 >. The fourth part is of practical significance. First, it reviews the legislative process of the legal protection system of our country's technical measures, analyzes the present situation of the existing legislation in our country, and shows the lack of legislation of our country's compatibility exception system. On the basis of the current specific national conditions of our country, the author draws on the advanced foreign legislative experience, and further puts forward constructive suggestions on the specific design of the compatibility exception system for the protection of technical measures in China. At the same time, the special institutions are authorized to apply the renewal mechanism to examine and adjust the system regularly. At the same time, the supervision institutions are set up, and the appropriate relief means are set up to form a more scientific and reasonable system design.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 隴小渝;張芳;;兼容性對電信競爭的影響及對管制政策的啟示[J];當代財經(jīng);2008年02期

2 唐百川;胡漢輝;;軟件企業(yè)的產品兼容性決策選擇[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年S1期

3 陳飛;美國合理使用制度在反向工程中的運用——以Sony訴Connectix案為線索[J];電子知識產權;2003年06期

4 張晉靜;軟件反向工程合法性的經(jīng)濟學分析[J];電子知識產權;2003年07期

5 王遷;濫用"技術措施"的法律對策——評美國Skylink案及Static案[J];電子知識產權;2005年01期

6 任軍民;;法國數(shù)字信息網(wǎng)絡最新立法述評[J];法商研究;2006年06期

7 馮曉青;;技術措施與著作權保護探討[J];法學雜志;2007年04期

8 李貝貝,黃鋒;信息技術的兼容性分析——以軟件業(yè)為例[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2003年07期

9 朱振中,呂廷杰;兼容性經(jīng)濟學研究的發(fā)展[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2004年09期

10 劉娜;周平;張順利;;云計算互操作性分類研究[J];信息技術與標準化;2012年Z1期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王東君;數(shù)字版權管理的法律限制問題研究[D];武漢大學;2011年

本文編號：2090844