本文選題：特許經(jīng)營 + 反壟斷法　； 參考：《山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：特許經(jīng)營是一種適應(yīng)市場經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模化、全球化、資源配置最優(yōu)化的商業(yè)和貿(mào)易經(jīng)營方式，換言之就是權(quán)利人(特許方)通過合同關(guān)系將自己的權(quán)利(以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為主)集中許可他人(被特許方)有償使用的一種民事活動(dòng)。特許經(jīng)營中的權(quán)利義務(wù)包括特許方對特許經(jīng)營權(quán)的所有權(quán)以及基于此權(quán)利授予被特許方的權(quán)利及產(chǎn)生的義務(wù)、被特許方基于被授予使用的特許經(jīng)營權(quán)而產(chǎn)生的權(quán)利義務(wù)。 特許經(jīng)營以獨(dú)特的價(jià)值和優(yōu)勢在世界范圍內(nèi)快速發(fā)展，但因其本身的特點(diǎn)隨之而來的往往是一些限制競爭的行為。對超出限度范圍的限制競爭行為進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制是我國反壟斷立法面臨的一個(gè)嶄新而富有意義的課題。面對具有多種表現(xiàn)形式的特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為，在其進(jìn)行規(guī)制時(shí)，要明確反壟斷立法的指導(dǎo)思想，，選擇合適的立法模式，詳細(xì)列舉出特許經(jīng)營中被限制的競爭行為，并且制定特許經(jīng)營中的反壟斷豁免制度。在特許經(jīng)營日益繁榮的今天，研究特許經(jīng)營的反壟斷法規(guī)制具有重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。 本文共分為五部分。第一部分從特許經(jīng)營的基本含義、特征和價(jià)值入手，通過比較包括我國商務(wù)部、原國內(nèi)貿(mào)易部、國際特許經(jīng)營協(xié)會(huì)、歐洲特許經(jīng)營聯(lián)合會(huì)、美國聯(lián)邦委員會(huì)等相關(guān)組織對于特許經(jīng)營的定義，為特許經(jīng)營可能引起的壟斷行為提供相關(guān)的基礎(chǔ)理論。第二部分通過研究剖析特許經(jīng)營與反壟斷法之間的關(guān)系，分析特許經(jīng)營所引起的限制競爭行為中的不利因素及表現(xiàn)，探析對于超出限度的限制競爭行為進(jìn)行反壟斷法規(guī)制的重要性。第三部分考察特許經(jīng)營反壟斷法規(guī)制在外國法上的規(guī)定，深入剖析歐盟和美國地區(qū)對于相關(guān)壟斷行為的法律規(guī)制原則，分析其對中國立法和司法實(shí)踐的借鑒意義。第四部分論述我國特許經(jīng)營反壟斷規(guī)制的立法現(xiàn)狀和存在問題，第五部分對我國特許經(jīng)營反壟斷法律規(guī)制體系的建立和完善提出立法構(gòu)想和建議，重點(diǎn)論述特許經(jīng)營反壟斷規(guī)制立法的目的和指導(dǎo)思想、立法的基本原則、立法的模式以及特許經(jīng)營反壟斷法規(guī)制的具體制度。
[Abstract]:Franchising is a business and trade mode that adapts to the scale of market economy, globalization and optimal allocation of resources. In other words, it is a civil activity in which the obligee (franchisor) centralizes his rights (mainly intellectual property) through a contractual relationship to authorize the paid use of others (franchisees). The rights and obligations in the franchise include the franchisor's ownership of the franchise and the rights and obligations granted to the franchisee on the basis of this right, and the franchisee's rights and obligations arising from the franchisee's use of the franchisee. Franchising develops rapidly in the world with its unique value and advantage, but because of its own characteristics, it often comes with some behaviors that restrict competition. It is a new and meaningful subject for China's antitrust legislation to regulate the restrictive competition behavior beyond the limit. In the face of the restrictive competition behavior of franchising with various forms of expression, it is necessary to make clear the guiding ideology of antitrust legislation, select the appropriate legislative model, and enumerate in detail the restricted competition behavior in franchise operation. And the establishment of franchise in the anti-monopoly exemption system. With the increasing prosperity of franchise, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the regulation of antimonopoly law. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part starts with the basic meaning, characteristics and value of franchising, including the Ministry of Commerce, the former Ministry of domestic Trade, the International franchise Association, the European Federation of franchise, The definition of franchising by relevant organizations, such as the Federal Commission of the United States, provides relevant basic theories for monopolistic behaviors that may result from franchising. The second part analyzes the relationship between franchising and anti-monopoly law, analyzes the adverse factors and manifestations of restrictive competition behavior caused by franchising. This paper analyzes the importance of anti-monopoly law regulating the restrictive competition behavior beyond its limits. The third part investigates the regulation of franchising anti-monopoly law in foreign law, deeply analyzes the legal regulation principles of the relevant monopoly behavior in the EU and the United States, and analyzes its reference significance for China's legislation and judicial practice. The fourth part discusses the current legislative situation and existing problems of the anti-monopoly regulation of franchising in China. The fifth part puts forward legislative ideas and suggestions on the establishment and improvement of the anti-monopoly legal regulation system of franchise in China. This paper focuses on the purpose and guiding ideology, the basic principles, the mode of legislation and the specific system of anti-monopoly regulation of franchising.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范在峰;特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為法律研究[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

2 王煜;特許經(jīng)營在我國發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、問題與前景[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 施漢嶸,沈兵;特許經(jīng)營中限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制[J];法律適用;2005年05期

4 饒粵紅;;特許經(jīng)營限制競爭行為反壟斷法適用的若干問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年01期

5 王勇;;試析特許經(jīng)營及其反壟斷問題——與國際接軌的又一新興通道[J];法學(xué)家;2002年05期

6 張莉;;特許經(jīng)營中的商標(biāo)權(quán)保護(hù)問題探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2009年01期

7 王顏顏;;論特許經(jīng)營中的商標(biāo)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年23期

8 劉文秀,朱建軍;歐洲聯(lián)盟的競爭政策[J];國際問題研究;2001年03期

9 楊潔;我國反壟斷法禁止限制競爭協(xié)議的立法研究[J];中國工商管理研究;2002年04期

10 肖仁輝;略論特許經(jīng)營[J];發(fā)展研究;2002年06期

本文編號：2061714