本文選題：3D打印技術(shù) + 版權(quán)性　； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：3D打印技術(shù)作為一項(xiàng)極有可能顛覆傳統(tǒng)制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)模式的革命性新型技術(shù),近年來(lái)在國(guó)內(nèi)外備受關(guān)注。一方面3D打印技術(shù)正在改變集中化、規(guī)�；膫鹘y(tǒng)生產(chǎn)方式,另一方面該技術(shù)也使制造侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品更加容易,由此引發(fā)更多的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛。在英國(guó)和美國(guó)等3D打印技術(shù)先進(jìn)和版權(quán)保護(hù)程度較為完善的國(guó)家,已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了關(guān)于3D打印侵權(quán)糾紛。我國(guó)雖然還未出現(xiàn)有關(guān)的糾紛,但是3D打印在我國(guó)發(fā)展迅猛,在不遠(yuǎn)的將來(lái)很有可能發(fā)生,并且在著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域更加普遍。由于3D打印技術(shù)是新型的技術(shù),我國(guó)法學(xué)界對(duì)該技術(shù)所引發(fā)的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題研究較少。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行著作權(quán)制度對(duì)3D打印過(guò)程中涉及的作品版權(quán)性和作品類型無(wú)明確的規(guī)定以及對(duì)“異維復(fù)制”態(tài)度模糊等問(wèn)題。對(duì)此本文結(jié)合3D打印的過(guò)程,希望明確我國(guó)著作權(quán)法中復(fù)制權(quán)的范圍,尤其是對(duì)合理使用做出一定的限制。完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)制度,以便更好的保護(hù)權(quán)利人的權(quán)益,從而也能更好的促進(jìn)3D打印技術(shù)的發(fā)展。第一部分論述了3D打印技術(shù)的分類和原理以及國(guó)內(nèi)外發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和前景。同時(shí)較為詳細(xì)的說(shuō)明了3D打印流程,具體可以劃分為3個(gè)階段:數(shù)據(jù)源(該階段又可細(xì)分為模型設(shè)計(jì)與切片階段)、打印、后期加工。其中數(shù)據(jù)源的獲取又有3種方式。上述每種獲取數(shù)據(jù)源的方式,都會(huì)影響到著作權(quán)客體的定性。第二部分論述了3D打印技術(shù)對(duì)現(xiàn)行著作權(quán)制度帶來(lái)的問(wèn)題。分別涉及著作權(quán)的客體、內(nèi)容以及權(quán)利限制。首先著作權(quán)法沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定3D數(shù)據(jù)模型和3D打印物的客體類型,且根據(jù)3D打印流程不同,3D數(shù)據(jù)模型和3D打印物的客體定性也不同。其次,3D打印涉及最多的就是平面到立體的復(fù)制,而我國(guó)著作權(quán)制度對(duì)“異維復(fù)制”的態(tài)度模糊。最后,3D打印對(duì)著作權(quán)制度沖擊最大的就是私人復(fù)制問(wèn)題。第三部分論述了著作權(quán)法下的3D打印客體定性分析。首先在獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的視角下分析了3D數(shù)字模型的版權(quán)性和作品類型。其次對(duì)3D打印物與3D數(shù)字模型的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分析。最后引入美國(guó)“可分離性理論”界定實(shí)用藝術(shù)品。第四部分提出了完善著作權(quán)制度的意見(jiàn)。首先應(yīng)當(dāng)適當(dāng)拓寬復(fù)制權(quán)范圍,將“異維復(fù)制”納入復(fù)制范圍;其次引入合理性使用的四個(gè)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn);最后引入CC知識(shí)共享協(xié)議和版權(quán)補(bǔ)償金制度。
[Abstract]:As a revolutionary technology, 3D printing technology has attracted much attention at home and abroad in recent years. On the one hand, 3D printing technology is changing the centralized and large-scale traditional production mode. On the other hand, it also makes it easier to manufacture infringing products, which leads to more intellectual property disputes. In countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, where the technology of 3D printing is advanced and the degree of copyright protection is relatively perfect, there has been a dispute about the infringement of 3D printing. Although there are no related disputes in China, 3D printing is developing rapidly in our country, which is likely to happen in the near future, and it is more common in the field of copyright. Because 3D printing technology is a new technology, there is little research on copyright problem caused by this technology in Chinese legal circles. The current copyright system of our country has no clear regulations on copyright and type of works involved in the process of 3D printing, and has a vague attitude towards "hetero-dimensional reproduction". Based on the process of 3D printing, this paper hopes to clarify the scope of the right of reproduction in copyright law of our country, especially to restrict the reasonable use of copyright law. Perfect our country copyright system, in order to better protect the rights and interests of the obligee, thus can better promote the development of 3D printing technology. The first part discusses the classification and principle of 3D printing technology and its development status and prospect at home and abroad. At the same time, the process of 3D printing is explained in detail, which can be divided into three stages: data source (which can be subdivided into model design and slicing stage), printing and post-processing. There are three ways to obtain data sources. Each of these ways of obtaining data sources will affect the nature of copyright objects. The second part discusses the problems of 3D printing technology to the current copyright system. It deals with the object, content and limitation of copyright respectively. Firstly, the copyright law does not specify the object type of 3D data model and 3D print, and the object quality of 3D data model and 3D print is different according to the process of 3D printing. Secondly, 3D printing involves plane-to-stereo reproduction, while the copyright system in China has a vague attitude towards "hetero-dimensional reproduction". Finally, the impact of 3D printing on the copyright system is the problem of private reproduction. The third part discusses the qualitative analysis of 3D printing object under copyright law. Firstly, the copyright and work types of 3D digital model are analyzed from the perspective of originality. Secondly, the relationship between 3D print and 3D digital model is analyzed. Finally, the American "separability theory" is introduced to define practical works of art. The fourth part puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the copyright system. Firstly, the scope of reproduction rights should be widened properly, and "hetero-dimensional replication" should be brought into the scope of replication; secondly, four criteria for rational use should be introduced; finally, CC knowledge sharing protocol and copyright compensation system should be introduced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李永明;鄭金晶;;3D打印中CAD文件的定性與復(fù)制問(wèn)題研究[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 寧立志;王德夫;;論3D打印數(shù)字模型的著作權(quán)[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

3 黃玉燁;張惠瑤;;3D數(shù)字模型的復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)探析[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

4 馬忠法;陳潛;;3D打印中的“復(fù)制”與“合理使用”[J];上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

5 張希平;蘇健強(qiáng);高健;;3D打印技術(shù)及我國(guó)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2015年06期

6 黃亮;;3D打印著作權(quán)問(wèn)題探討[J];現(xiàn)代出版;2015年02期

7 王淑君;;3D打印版權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)出版;2015年02期

8 韋之;;試論3D打印核心著作權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

9 羅嬌;;“3D打印”的著作權(quán)法律問(wèn)題研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

10 劉強(qiáng);歐陽(yáng)e，

本文編號(hào)：2059846