發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-21 09:37

  本文選題：專利 + 國(guó)際糾紛��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程的不斷推進(jìn)和知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮，跨國(guó)專利糾紛的數(shù)量急劇增加。構(gòu)建一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)、快捷的專利國(guó)際糾紛解決方式已日益成為最大程度釋放國(guó)際專利的經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)效益的重要途徑，也是各國(guó)涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的必要內(nèi)容。在和平與發(fā)展的時(shí)代主題之下，構(gòu)建一種重視交流合作，推崇尊重與寬容，倡導(dǎo)和諧理念的高效解紛方式是國(guó)際社會(huì)的共同呼聲。然而，由于國(guó)際專利糾紛具有專業(yè)性強(qiáng)、標(biāo)的額大、法律關(guān)系復(fù)雜、法律適用沖突和多重管轄的特點(diǎn)，有著諸多弊端的訴訟往往讓專利國(guó)際糾紛的當(dāng)事人賠了夫人又折兵，甚至談訴色變。 在上世紀(jì)60、70年代，西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家就意識(shí)到了民事訴訟的程序正義與糾紛當(dāng)事人所渴求的實(shí)質(zhì)正義的差距，掀起了倡導(dǎo)非訴糾紛解決方式的“接近正義”的司法改革浪潮。然而，專利國(guó)際糾紛采用非訴解決方式的做法經(jīng)過(guò)了很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間才被國(guó)際社會(huì)有條件的認(rèn)可。隨著各國(guó)擴(kuò)大公共利益的范圍，非訴糾紛解決方式才逐漸適用于原本專為訴訟保留的專利領(lǐng)域。 在專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決實(shí)踐中，一些重要國(guó)際組織對(duì)專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決的規(guī)定及實(shí)踐不僅為專利國(guó)際糾紛的可ADR性提供了實(shí)踐依據(jù)，同時(shí)為專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決積累了許多有益的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。其中最有特色的是世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)組織仲裁與調(diào)解中心和關(guān)貿(mào)總協(xié)定的調(diào)解小組對(duì)專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決實(shí)踐。 筆者運(yùn)用對(duì)比分析法，將專利國(guó)際糾紛的訴訟解決和專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決的效果進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析得出以下研究結(jié)果：專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決方式比國(guó)際訴訟更為靈活，，能夠保障當(dāng)事人的意思自治；有利于糾紛的正確、即時(shí)、低廉和和平解決；有利于保持當(dāng)事人之間友好的商貿(mào)關(guān)系；更能滿足當(dāng)事人對(duì)案件保密的要求；更有利于處理結(jié)果的實(shí)際執(zhí)行。本文從法理學(xué)、管理學(xué)、心理學(xué)、倫理學(xué)和法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度論證專利國(guó)際糾紛的非訴解決方式的必要性。同時(shí)，文章探討了美國(guó)、英國(guó)、印度等主要國(guó)家有關(guān)專利國(guó)際糾紛非訴解決方式的立法和實(shí)踐。最后，筆者分析了我國(guó)專利國(guó)際糾紛解決方式的現(xiàn)狀，并對(duì)其進(jìn)一步完善提供了一些思路。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization and the prosperity of knowledge economy, the number of transnational patent disputes increases rapidly. The construction of an economic and fast way to resolve international patent disputes has become an important way to release the economic and social benefits of international patents to the greatest extent, and is also a necessary content for the protection of intellectual property rights involving foreign countries. Under the theme of peace and development, it is the common voice of the international community to construct an efficient way of resolving disputes by attaching importance to communication and cooperation, advocating respect and tolerance, and advocating the idea of harmony. However, due to the characteristics of international patent disputes with strong professionalism, large amount of subject matter, complicated legal relations, conflict of application of laws and multiple jurisdictions, litigation with many drawbacks often makes the parties to international patent disputes lose their wives and fold their troops. Even talk about color change. In the 1960s and 1970s, the western developed countries realized the gap between the procedural justice of civil litigation and the substantive justice that the litigants wanted, and set off a wave of judicial reform of "approaching justice" which advocated the non-litigation dispute resolution. However, it took a long time for international patent disputes to adopt non-litigation method. As countries expand the scope of public interest, non-litigation dispute resolution is gradually applied to the patent field reserved for litigation. In the practice of non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes, some important international organizations not only provide practical basis for ADR of international patent disputes, but also provide practical basis for non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes. At the same time, it has accumulated a lot of beneficial experience for the non-litigation settlement of patent international disputes. The world intellectual property organization arbitration and mediation center and the GATT mediation team of the international patent dispute settlement practice. By means of comparative analysis, the author makes a comparative analysis of the effects of litigation settlement of international patent disputes and non-litigation settlement of international patent disputes. The results are as follows: the non-litigation settlement of patent international disputes is more flexible than that of international litigation. It can guarantee the autonomy of the parties, be conducive to the correct, immediate, inexpensive and peaceful settlement of disputes, help to maintain friendly commercial relations between the parties, and better meet the requirements of the parties to the confidentiality of the case; It is more advantageous to handle the actual implementation of the results. This paper discusses the necessity of solving international patent disputes from the perspectives of jurisprudence, management, psychology, ethics and legal economics. At the same time, this paper discusses the legislation and practice of patent international dispute settlement in America, Britain, India and other major countries. Finally, the author analyzes the current situation of international patent dispute resolution in China, and provides some ideas for its further improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 吳友明;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年04期

2 張建邦;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際組織內(nèi)部爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制述評(píng)──基于WIPO和WTO的理論和實(shí)踐[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2007年10期

本文編號(hào)：2048118